Life History strategy and Evaluative Self-Assessment

Paul Robert Gladden, Aurelio J Figueredo, Brynn Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Life History (LH) theory describes the existence of individual differences in the optimal allocation of inherently limited bioenergetic and material resources towards different types of reproductive-enhancing activities. LH theory predicts that slow LH ("High-K") individuals are biased toward allocating resources toward enhancing the phenotypic quality (e.g., physical and mental health) of oneself and one's offspring. Sociometer theory suggests that self-esteem tracks an individual's level of social acceptance and inclusion. We examined the hypothesis that slow LH strategy positively predicts a more positive Evaluative Self-Assessment due to enhanced phenotypic quality. Participants completed questionnaires measuring their Life History (LH) strategies and a variety of measures of Self-Assessment (perceived mate value, perceived mating success, social economic exchange, positive and negative adjectives, global self-esteem, and collective self-esteem). An Exploratory Factor Analysis indicated that the measures of Evaluative Self-Assessment were best represented as a single latent factor. Slow LH strategy correlated moderately and positively with this Evaluative Self-Assessment factor. This relationship was not accounted for by socially desirable responding (self-deceptive enhancement or impression-management), sex, or age of participants. Consistent with Sociometer theory, we suggest that slow LH strategists exhibit high perceived self-worth due to increased social prestige and, relatedly, enhanced phenotypic quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)731-735
Number of pages5
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume48
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Self Concept
History
Social Distance
Individuality
Energy Metabolism
Statistical Factor Analysis
Mental Health
Economics
Life History Traits
Self-Assessment

Keywords

  • Evaluative Self-Assessment
  • Life History
  • Mate value
  • Self-esteem
  • Sociometer theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Life History strategy and Evaluative Self-Assessment. / Gladden, Paul Robert; Figueredo, Aurelio J; Snyder, Brynn.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 48, No. 6, 04.2010, p. 731-735.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gladden, Paul Robert ; Figueredo, Aurelio J ; Snyder, Brynn. / Life History strategy and Evaluative Self-Assessment. In: Personality and Individual Differences. 2010 ; Vol. 48, No. 6. pp. 731-735.
@article{64c7834651c24643bd00b52d14ad3ad7,
title = "Life History strategy and Evaluative Self-Assessment",
abstract = "Life History (LH) theory describes the existence of individual differences in the optimal allocation of inherently limited bioenergetic and material resources towards different types of reproductive-enhancing activities. LH theory predicts that slow LH ({"}High-K{"}) individuals are biased toward allocating resources toward enhancing the phenotypic quality (e.g., physical and mental health) of oneself and one's offspring. Sociometer theory suggests that self-esteem tracks an individual's level of social acceptance and inclusion. We examined the hypothesis that slow LH strategy positively predicts a more positive Evaluative Self-Assessment due to enhanced phenotypic quality. Participants completed questionnaires measuring their Life History (LH) strategies and a variety of measures of Self-Assessment (perceived mate value, perceived mating success, social economic exchange, positive and negative adjectives, global self-esteem, and collective self-esteem). An Exploratory Factor Analysis indicated that the measures of Evaluative Self-Assessment were best represented as a single latent factor. Slow LH strategy correlated moderately and positively with this Evaluative Self-Assessment factor. This relationship was not accounted for by socially desirable responding (self-deceptive enhancement or impression-management), sex, or age of participants. Consistent with Sociometer theory, we suggest that slow LH strategists exhibit high perceived self-worth due to increased social prestige and, relatedly, enhanced phenotypic quality.",
keywords = "Evaluative Self-Assessment, Life History, Mate value, Self-esteem, Sociometer theory",
author = "Gladden, {Paul Robert} and Figueredo, {Aurelio J} and Brynn Snyder",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "731--735",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Life History strategy and Evaluative Self-Assessment

AU - Gladden, Paul Robert

AU - Figueredo, Aurelio J

AU - Snyder, Brynn

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Life History (LH) theory describes the existence of individual differences in the optimal allocation of inherently limited bioenergetic and material resources towards different types of reproductive-enhancing activities. LH theory predicts that slow LH ("High-K") individuals are biased toward allocating resources toward enhancing the phenotypic quality (e.g., physical and mental health) of oneself and one's offspring. Sociometer theory suggests that self-esteem tracks an individual's level of social acceptance and inclusion. We examined the hypothesis that slow LH strategy positively predicts a more positive Evaluative Self-Assessment due to enhanced phenotypic quality. Participants completed questionnaires measuring their Life History (LH) strategies and a variety of measures of Self-Assessment (perceived mate value, perceived mating success, social economic exchange, positive and negative adjectives, global self-esteem, and collective self-esteem). An Exploratory Factor Analysis indicated that the measures of Evaluative Self-Assessment were best represented as a single latent factor. Slow LH strategy correlated moderately and positively with this Evaluative Self-Assessment factor. This relationship was not accounted for by socially desirable responding (self-deceptive enhancement or impression-management), sex, or age of participants. Consistent with Sociometer theory, we suggest that slow LH strategists exhibit high perceived self-worth due to increased social prestige and, relatedly, enhanced phenotypic quality.

AB - Life History (LH) theory describes the existence of individual differences in the optimal allocation of inherently limited bioenergetic and material resources towards different types of reproductive-enhancing activities. LH theory predicts that slow LH ("High-K") individuals are biased toward allocating resources toward enhancing the phenotypic quality (e.g., physical and mental health) of oneself and one's offspring. Sociometer theory suggests that self-esteem tracks an individual's level of social acceptance and inclusion. We examined the hypothesis that slow LH strategy positively predicts a more positive Evaluative Self-Assessment due to enhanced phenotypic quality. Participants completed questionnaires measuring their Life History (LH) strategies and a variety of measures of Self-Assessment (perceived mate value, perceived mating success, social economic exchange, positive and negative adjectives, global self-esteem, and collective self-esteem). An Exploratory Factor Analysis indicated that the measures of Evaluative Self-Assessment were best represented as a single latent factor. Slow LH strategy correlated moderately and positively with this Evaluative Self-Assessment factor. This relationship was not accounted for by socially desirable responding (self-deceptive enhancement or impression-management), sex, or age of participants. Consistent with Sociometer theory, we suggest that slow LH strategists exhibit high perceived self-worth due to increased social prestige and, relatedly, enhanced phenotypic quality.

KW - Evaluative Self-Assessment

KW - Life History

KW - Mate value

KW - Self-esteem

KW - Sociometer theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77349124875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77349124875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.016

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.016

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77349124875

VL - 48

SP - 731

EP - 735

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 6

ER -