Light rail transit and economic recovery: A case of resilience or transformation?

Arthur Christian Nelson, Philip Stoker, Robert Hibberd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The ecological concept of “resilience” has been applied to social and economic systems in researchers’ attempts to understand the extent to which those systems recover after calamity. Resilience strictly speaking can mean little more than carrying on as usual after a period of recovery. It can also mean learning from calamity so that while most functions resume, systems are prepared for the next, similar calamity. But transformation can also occur whereby systems are restructured, abandoning the most vulnerable pre-calamity elements while redirecting resources to new elements better able to withstand known and unknown future calamities. We apply the concepts of resilience and transformation to the seven light rail transit (LRT) systems operating in the U.S. before, during and after the Great Recession. Using shift-share analysis across groups of economic sectors, we trace the share and shift in the share of jobs in those sectors during each of the three time periods. We find that economic activity within 0.50-mile of LRT stations was more resilient during the Great Recession than their metropolitan areas as a whole, and those economies appear to have been transformed such that jobs were shifting substantially more to LRT corridors in the post-recession period than before.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalResearch in Transportation Economics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Light rail transit
resilience
recession
Recovery
Economics
economics
economic sector
economic system
social system
agglomeration area
economy
Rail
Economic recovery
Resilience
resources
learning
Group

Keywords

  • Economic transformation
  • Resilience
  • Transit and economic development
  • Transit and economic transformation
  • Transit and resiliency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transportation
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Light rail transit and economic recovery : A case of resilience or transformation? / Nelson, Arthur Christian; Stoker, Philip; Hibberd, Robert.

In: Research in Transportation Economics, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ab192253625c485c8ac27ade9606880b,
title = "Light rail transit and economic recovery: A case of resilience or transformation?",
abstract = "The ecological concept of “resilience” has been applied to social and economic systems in researchers’ attempts to understand the extent to which those systems recover after calamity. Resilience strictly speaking can mean little more than carrying on as usual after a period of recovery. It can also mean learning from calamity so that while most functions resume, systems are prepared for the next, similar calamity. But transformation can also occur whereby systems are restructured, abandoning the most vulnerable pre-calamity elements while redirecting resources to new elements better able to withstand known and unknown future calamities. We apply the concepts of resilience and transformation to the seven light rail transit (LRT) systems operating in the U.S. before, during and after the Great Recession. Using shift-share analysis across groups of economic sectors, we trace the share and shift in the share of jobs in those sectors during each of the three time periods. We find that economic activity within 0.50-mile of LRT stations was more resilient during the Great Recession than their metropolitan areas as a whole, and those economies appear to have been transformed such that jobs were shifting substantially more to LRT corridors in the post-recession period than before.",
keywords = "Economic transformation, Resilience, Transit and economic development, Transit and economic transformation, Transit and resiliency",
author = "Nelson, {Arthur Christian} and Philip Stoker and Robert Hibberd",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.retrec.2018.11.003",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Research in Transportation Economics",
issn = "0739-8859",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Light rail transit and economic recovery

T2 - A case of resilience or transformation?

AU - Nelson, Arthur Christian

AU - Stoker, Philip

AU - Hibberd, Robert

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The ecological concept of “resilience” has been applied to social and economic systems in researchers’ attempts to understand the extent to which those systems recover after calamity. Resilience strictly speaking can mean little more than carrying on as usual after a period of recovery. It can also mean learning from calamity so that while most functions resume, systems are prepared for the next, similar calamity. But transformation can also occur whereby systems are restructured, abandoning the most vulnerable pre-calamity elements while redirecting resources to new elements better able to withstand known and unknown future calamities. We apply the concepts of resilience and transformation to the seven light rail transit (LRT) systems operating in the U.S. before, during and after the Great Recession. Using shift-share analysis across groups of economic sectors, we trace the share and shift in the share of jobs in those sectors during each of the three time periods. We find that economic activity within 0.50-mile of LRT stations was more resilient during the Great Recession than their metropolitan areas as a whole, and those economies appear to have been transformed such that jobs were shifting substantially more to LRT corridors in the post-recession period than before.

AB - The ecological concept of “resilience” has been applied to social and economic systems in researchers’ attempts to understand the extent to which those systems recover after calamity. Resilience strictly speaking can mean little more than carrying on as usual after a period of recovery. It can also mean learning from calamity so that while most functions resume, systems are prepared for the next, similar calamity. But transformation can also occur whereby systems are restructured, abandoning the most vulnerable pre-calamity elements while redirecting resources to new elements better able to withstand known and unknown future calamities. We apply the concepts of resilience and transformation to the seven light rail transit (LRT) systems operating in the U.S. before, during and after the Great Recession. Using shift-share analysis across groups of economic sectors, we trace the share and shift in the share of jobs in those sectors during each of the three time periods. We find that economic activity within 0.50-mile of LRT stations was more resilient during the Great Recession than their metropolitan areas as a whole, and those economies appear to have been transformed such that jobs were shifting substantially more to LRT corridors in the post-recession period than before.

KW - Economic transformation

KW - Resilience

KW - Transit and economic development

KW - Transit and economic transformation

KW - Transit and resiliency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056702136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056702136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.11.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85056702136

JO - Research in Transportation Economics

JF - Research in Transportation Economics

SN - 0739-8859

ER -