Limits of longitudinal decline for the interpretation of annual changes in FEV1 in individuals

Eva Hnizdo, Kanta Sircar, Tieliang Yan, Philip I Harber, James Fleming, Henry W. Glindmeyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Spirometry-based screening programmes often conduct annual assessment of longitudinal changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to identify individuals with excessive rates of decline. Both the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) recommend a reference limit value of ≥15% for excessive annual decline. Neither the ATS nor the ACOEM adjust this limit for the precision of the existing spirometry data. The authors propose an improved method of defining the reference limit of longitudinal annual FEVi decline (LLD) based on the precision of the spirometry data. Method: The authors used data from four monitoring programmes and measured their data precision using a pair-wise within-person variation statistic. They then derived programme- and gender-specific absolute and relative LLD values and validated these against the 95th percentiles for observed yearly changes in FEV1. Results: The relative limit for annual decline was more practical than the absolute limit as it adjusted for gender differences in the magnitude of FEV1. The programme-specific relative limit values were in good agreement with 95th percentiles for year-to-year FEV1 changes and ranged from 6.6% to 15.8%. For individuals with COPD and bronchial hyperreactivity the 95th percentiles for year-to-year changes were about 15% and higher. Conclusions: The relative longitudinal limit for annual FEV1 decline based upon precision of measurements is valid and can be generalised to different gender and population groups. A relative limit of approximately 10% appears appropriate for good quality workplace monitoring programmes, whereas a limit of about 15% appears appropriate for clinical evaluation of individuals with an obstructive airway disease. Computer software based on the method described is available from the corresponding author.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)701-707
Number of pages7
JournalOccupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume64
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Forced Expiratory Volume
Spirometry
Environmental Medicine
gender
Occupational Medicine
Bronchial Hyperreactivity
monitoring
workplace
Population Groups
Workplace
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Reference Values
Thorax
Software
programme
software
method
limit value
occupational medicine
environmental medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Limits of longitudinal decline for the interpretation of annual changes in FEV1 in individuals. / Hnizdo, Eva; Sircar, Kanta; Yan, Tieliang; Harber, Philip I; Fleming, James; Glindmeyer, Henry W.

In: Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 64, No. 10, 10.2007, p. 701-707.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hnizdo, Eva ; Sircar, Kanta ; Yan, Tieliang ; Harber, Philip I ; Fleming, James ; Glindmeyer, Henry W. / Limits of longitudinal decline for the interpretation of annual changes in FEV1 in individuals. In: Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 64, No. 10. pp. 701-707.
@article{777e16aec404456d9b72326051ec62b3,
title = "Limits of longitudinal decline for the interpretation of annual changes in FEV1 in individuals",
abstract = "Objective: Spirometry-based screening programmes often conduct annual assessment of longitudinal changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to identify individuals with excessive rates of decline. Both the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) recommend a reference limit value of ≥15{\%} for excessive annual decline. Neither the ATS nor the ACOEM adjust this limit for the precision of the existing spirometry data. The authors propose an improved method of defining the reference limit of longitudinal annual FEVi decline (LLD) based on the precision of the spirometry data. Method: The authors used data from four monitoring programmes and measured their data precision using a pair-wise within-person variation statistic. They then derived programme- and gender-specific absolute and relative LLD values and validated these against the 95th percentiles for observed yearly changes in FEV1. Results: The relative limit for annual decline was more practical than the absolute limit as it adjusted for gender differences in the magnitude of FEV1. The programme-specific relative limit values were in good agreement with 95th percentiles for year-to-year FEV1 changes and ranged from 6.6{\%} to 15.8{\%}. For individuals with COPD and bronchial hyperreactivity the 95th percentiles for year-to-year changes were about 15{\%} and higher. Conclusions: The relative longitudinal limit for annual FEV1 decline based upon precision of measurements is valid and can be generalised to different gender and population groups. A relative limit of approximately 10{\%} appears appropriate for good quality workplace monitoring programmes, whereas a limit of about 15{\%} appears appropriate for clinical evaluation of individuals with an obstructive airway disease. Computer software based on the method described is available from the corresponding author.",
author = "Eva Hnizdo and Kanta Sircar and Tieliang Yan and Harber, {Philip I} and James Fleming and Glindmeyer, {Henry W.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1136/oem.2006.031146",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "701--707",
journal = "Occupational and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "1351-0711",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limits of longitudinal decline for the interpretation of annual changes in FEV1 in individuals

AU - Hnizdo, Eva

AU - Sircar, Kanta

AU - Yan, Tieliang

AU - Harber, Philip I

AU - Fleming, James

AU - Glindmeyer, Henry W.

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Objective: Spirometry-based screening programmes often conduct annual assessment of longitudinal changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to identify individuals with excessive rates of decline. Both the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) recommend a reference limit value of ≥15% for excessive annual decline. Neither the ATS nor the ACOEM adjust this limit for the precision of the existing spirometry data. The authors propose an improved method of defining the reference limit of longitudinal annual FEVi decline (LLD) based on the precision of the spirometry data. Method: The authors used data from four monitoring programmes and measured their data precision using a pair-wise within-person variation statistic. They then derived programme- and gender-specific absolute and relative LLD values and validated these against the 95th percentiles for observed yearly changes in FEV1. Results: The relative limit for annual decline was more practical than the absolute limit as it adjusted for gender differences in the magnitude of FEV1. The programme-specific relative limit values were in good agreement with 95th percentiles for year-to-year FEV1 changes and ranged from 6.6% to 15.8%. For individuals with COPD and bronchial hyperreactivity the 95th percentiles for year-to-year changes were about 15% and higher. Conclusions: The relative longitudinal limit for annual FEV1 decline based upon precision of measurements is valid and can be generalised to different gender and population groups. A relative limit of approximately 10% appears appropriate for good quality workplace monitoring programmes, whereas a limit of about 15% appears appropriate for clinical evaluation of individuals with an obstructive airway disease. Computer software based on the method described is available from the corresponding author.

AB - Objective: Spirometry-based screening programmes often conduct annual assessment of longitudinal changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) to identify individuals with excessive rates of decline. Both the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) recommend a reference limit value of ≥15% for excessive annual decline. Neither the ATS nor the ACOEM adjust this limit for the precision of the existing spirometry data. The authors propose an improved method of defining the reference limit of longitudinal annual FEVi decline (LLD) based on the precision of the spirometry data. Method: The authors used data from four monitoring programmes and measured their data precision using a pair-wise within-person variation statistic. They then derived programme- and gender-specific absolute and relative LLD values and validated these against the 95th percentiles for observed yearly changes in FEV1. Results: The relative limit for annual decline was more practical than the absolute limit as it adjusted for gender differences in the magnitude of FEV1. The programme-specific relative limit values were in good agreement with 95th percentiles for year-to-year FEV1 changes and ranged from 6.6% to 15.8%. For individuals with COPD and bronchial hyperreactivity the 95th percentiles for year-to-year changes were about 15% and higher. Conclusions: The relative longitudinal limit for annual FEV1 decline based upon precision of measurements is valid and can be generalised to different gender and population groups. A relative limit of approximately 10% appears appropriate for good quality workplace monitoring programmes, whereas a limit of about 15% appears appropriate for clinical evaluation of individuals with an obstructive airway disease. Computer software based on the method described is available from the corresponding author.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34748832245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34748832245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/oem.2006.031146

DO - 10.1136/oem.2006.031146

M3 - Article

C2 - 17478573

AN - SCOPUS:34748832245

VL - 64

SP - 701

EP - 707

JO - Occupational and Environmental Medicine

JF - Occupational and Environmental Medicine

SN - 1351-0711

IS - 10

ER -