Limits to trophic levels and omnivory in complex food webs: Theory and data

Richard J. Williams, Neo D Martinez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 174 Citations

Abstract

While trophic levels have found broad application throughout ecology, they are also in much contention on analytical and empirical grounds. Here, we use a new generation of data and theory to examine long-standing questions about trophic-level limits and degrees of omnivory. The data include food webs of the Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A., the island of Saint Martin, a U.K. grassland, and a Florida seagrass community, which appear to be the most trophically complete food webs available in the primary literature due to their inclusion of autotrophs and empirically derived estimates of the relative energetic contributions of each trophic link. We show that most (54%) of the 212 species in the four food webs can be unambiguously assigned to a discrete trophic level. Omnivory among the remaining species appears to be quite limited, as judged by the standard deviation of omnivores' energy-weighted food-chain lengths. This allows simple algorithms based on binary food webs without energetic details to yield surprisingly accurate estimates of species' trophic and omnivory levels. While maximum trophic levels may plausibly exceed historically asserted limits, our analyses contradict both recent empirical claims that these limits are exceeded and recent theoretical claims that rampant omnivory eliminates the scientific utility of the trophic-level concept.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages458-468
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Volume163
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

omnivory
omnivores
trophic level
food webs
food web
energetics
French West Indies
Chesapeake Bay
autotrophs
seagrass
food chain
grasslands
grassland
trophic levels
ecology
energy

Keywords

  • Food chains
  • Omnivory
  • Trophic level

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Limits to trophic levels and omnivory in complex food webs : Theory and data. / Williams, Richard J.; Martinez, Neo D.

In: American Naturalist, Vol. 163, No. 3, 03.2004, p. 458-468.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da0cd3754f5f40818e51e60952814c3f,
title = "Limits to trophic levels and omnivory in complex food webs: Theory and data",
abstract = "While trophic levels have found broad application throughout ecology, they are also in much contention on analytical and empirical grounds. Here, we use a new generation of data and theory to examine long-standing questions about trophic-level limits and degrees of omnivory. The data include food webs of the Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A., the island of Saint Martin, a U.K. grassland, and a Florida seagrass community, which appear to be the most trophically complete food webs available in the primary literature due to their inclusion of autotrophs and empirically derived estimates of the relative energetic contributions of each trophic link. We show that most (54{\%}) of the 212 species in the four food webs can be unambiguously assigned to a discrete trophic level. Omnivory among the remaining species appears to be quite limited, as judged by the standard deviation of omnivores' energy-weighted food-chain lengths. This allows simple algorithms based on binary food webs without energetic details to yield surprisingly accurate estimates of species' trophic and omnivory levels. While maximum trophic levels may plausibly exceed historically asserted limits, our analyses contradict both recent empirical claims that these limits are exceeded and recent theoretical claims that rampant omnivory eliminates the scientific utility of the trophic-level concept.",
keywords = "Food chains, Omnivory, Trophic level",
author = "Williams, {Richard J.} and Martinez, {Neo D}",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1086/381964",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "163",
pages = "458--468",
journal = "American Naturalist",
issn = "0003-0147",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limits to trophic levels and omnivory in complex food webs

T2 - American Naturalist

AU - Williams, Richard J.

AU - Martinez, Neo D

PY - 2004/3

Y1 - 2004/3

N2 - While trophic levels have found broad application throughout ecology, they are also in much contention on analytical and empirical grounds. Here, we use a new generation of data and theory to examine long-standing questions about trophic-level limits and degrees of omnivory. The data include food webs of the Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A., the island of Saint Martin, a U.K. grassland, and a Florida seagrass community, which appear to be the most trophically complete food webs available in the primary literature due to their inclusion of autotrophs and empirically derived estimates of the relative energetic contributions of each trophic link. We show that most (54%) of the 212 species in the four food webs can be unambiguously assigned to a discrete trophic level. Omnivory among the remaining species appears to be quite limited, as judged by the standard deviation of omnivores' energy-weighted food-chain lengths. This allows simple algorithms based on binary food webs without energetic details to yield surprisingly accurate estimates of species' trophic and omnivory levels. While maximum trophic levels may plausibly exceed historically asserted limits, our analyses contradict both recent empirical claims that these limits are exceeded and recent theoretical claims that rampant omnivory eliminates the scientific utility of the trophic-level concept.

AB - While trophic levels have found broad application throughout ecology, they are also in much contention on analytical and empirical grounds. Here, we use a new generation of data and theory to examine long-standing questions about trophic-level limits and degrees of omnivory. The data include food webs of the Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A., the island of Saint Martin, a U.K. grassland, and a Florida seagrass community, which appear to be the most trophically complete food webs available in the primary literature due to their inclusion of autotrophs and empirically derived estimates of the relative energetic contributions of each trophic link. We show that most (54%) of the 212 species in the four food webs can be unambiguously assigned to a discrete trophic level. Omnivory among the remaining species appears to be quite limited, as judged by the standard deviation of omnivores' energy-weighted food-chain lengths. This allows simple algorithms based on binary food webs without energetic details to yield surprisingly accurate estimates of species' trophic and omnivory levels. While maximum trophic levels may plausibly exceed historically asserted limits, our analyses contradict both recent empirical claims that these limits are exceeded and recent theoretical claims that rampant omnivory eliminates the scientific utility of the trophic-level concept.

KW - Food chains

KW - Omnivory

KW - Trophic level

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842661790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842661790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/381964

DO - 10.1086/381964

M3 - Article

VL - 163

SP - 458

EP - 468

JO - American Naturalist

JF - American Naturalist

SN - 0003-0147

IS - 3

ER -