Liquid crystal thermometry for continuous temperature measurement in emergency department patients

Richard C. Dart, Stanford C. Lee, Steven M. Joyce, Harvey W Meislin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A single temperature measurement recorded on admission to the emergency department provides no information about temperature alterations occurring during the course of evaluation. Continuous monitoring of patients' temperatures in the ED, however, may alter management and decrease morbidity. Our study evaluated the reliability of liquid crystal thermometers (LCTs) and the clinical benefit of continuous temperature monitoring in the ED. Commercially available LCTs (corrected 4° F to reflect core temperature) were applied to the foreheads of randomly selected patients. Serial oral electronic thermometer readings were compared to those obtained by LCT. Fever was defined as a temperature higher than 99.5 F orally or 100 F by LCT. One hundred two patients underwent simultaneous LCT and oral temperature measurements, with a correlation coefficient of 0.661. Hypothermia was not encountered. Eighty-four patients were afebrile, and 18 were febrile by oral measurement on admission. Of the afebrile patients, 13 (15.5%) became febrile while in the ED. The temperature course was identified correctly by LCT in 83.3% of cases. The LCT correctly identified all patients who were febrile on admission, as well as 92.3% of those who developed fever while in the ED. The latter fevers would have been missed by routine single-temperature determination on ED admission. Detection of fever stimulated more aggressive clinical evaluation of these patients. Eight of nine patients who defervesced in response to antipyretic therapy were identified correctly by LCT. LCT falsely identified 16 patients as becoming febrile (15.6% false positive), while missing only one patient who developed fever in the ED (1% false negative). LCT reliably monitors the dynamic temperature course of ED patients inexpensively and without invasive, complicated instrumentation. We recommend that patients identified as febrile by LCT be checked with an oral or rectal thermometer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1188-1190
Number of pages3
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume14
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1985

Fingerprint

Thermometry
Thermometers
Liquid Crystals
Hospital Emergency Service
Fever
Temperature
Antipyretics
Forehead
Physiologic Monitoring
Hypothermia

Keywords

  • temperature, monitoring, methods
  • thermometry, liquid crystal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Liquid crystal thermometry for continuous temperature measurement in emergency department patients. / Dart, Richard C.; Lee, Stanford C.; Joyce, Steven M.; Meislin, Harvey W.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 12, 1985, p. 1188-1190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dart, Richard C. ; Lee, Stanford C. ; Joyce, Steven M. ; Meislin, Harvey W. / Liquid crystal thermometry for continuous temperature measurement in emergency department patients. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1985 ; Vol. 14, No. 12. pp. 1188-1190.
@article{eb0d1b5400af4c80b7b71d4e48e409ee,
title = "Liquid crystal thermometry for continuous temperature measurement in emergency department patients",
abstract = "A single temperature measurement recorded on admission to the emergency department provides no information about temperature alterations occurring during the course of evaluation. Continuous monitoring of patients' temperatures in the ED, however, may alter management and decrease morbidity. Our study evaluated the reliability of liquid crystal thermometers (LCTs) and the clinical benefit of continuous temperature monitoring in the ED. Commercially available LCTs (corrected 4° F to reflect core temperature) were applied to the foreheads of randomly selected patients. Serial oral electronic thermometer readings were compared to those obtained by LCT. Fever was defined as a temperature higher than 99.5 F orally or 100 F by LCT. One hundred two patients underwent simultaneous LCT and oral temperature measurements, with a correlation coefficient of 0.661. Hypothermia was not encountered. Eighty-four patients were afebrile, and 18 were febrile by oral measurement on admission. Of the afebrile patients, 13 (15.5{\%}) became febrile while in the ED. The temperature course was identified correctly by LCT in 83.3{\%} of cases. The LCT correctly identified all patients who were febrile on admission, as well as 92.3{\%} of those who developed fever while in the ED. The latter fevers would have been missed by routine single-temperature determination on ED admission. Detection of fever stimulated more aggressive clinical evaluation of these patients. Eight of nine patients who defervesced in response to antipyretic therapy were identified correctly by LCT. LCT falsely identified 16 patients as becoming febrile (15.6{\%} false positive), while missing only one patient who developed fever in the ED (1{\%} false negative). LCT reliably monitors the dynamic temperature course of ED patients inexpensively and without invasive, complicated instrumentation. We recommend that patients identified as febrile by LCT be checked with an oral or rectal thermometer.",
keywords = "temperature, monitoring, methods, thermometry, liquid crystal",
author = "Dart, {Richard C.} and Lee, {Stanford C.} and Joyce, {Steven M.} and Meislin, {Harvey W}",
year = "1985",
doi = "10.1016/S0196-0644(85)81027-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "1188--1190",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liquid crystal thermometry for continuous temperature measurement in emergency department patients

AU - Dart, Richard C.

AU - Lee, Stanford C.

AU - Joyce, Steven M.

AU - Meislin, Harvey W

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - A single temperature measurement recorded on admission to the emergency department provides no information about temperature alterations occurring during the course of evaluation. Continuous monitoring of patients' temperatures in the ED, however, may alter management and decrease morbidity. Our study evaluated the reliability of liquid crystal thermometers (LCTs) and the clinical benefit of continuous temperature monitoring in the ED. Commercially available LCTs (corrected 4° F to reflect core temperature) were applied to the foreheads of randomly selected patients. Serial oral electronic thermometer readings were compared to those obtained by LCT. Fever was defined as a temperature higher than 99.5 F orally or 100 F by LCT. One hundred two patients underwent simultaneous LCT and oral temperature measurements, with a correlation coefficient of 0.661. Hypothermia was not encountered. Eighty-four patients were afebrile, and 18 were febrile by oral measurement on admission. Of the afebrile patients, 13 (15.5%) became febrile while in the ED. The temperature course was identified correctly by LCT in 83.3% of cases. The LCT correctly identified all patients who were febrile on admission, as well as 92.3% of those who developed fever while in the ED. The latter fevers would have been missed by routine single-temperature determination on ED admission. Detection of fever stimulated more aggressive clinical evaluation of these patients. Eight of nine patients who defervesced in response to antipyretic therapy were identified correctly by LCT. LCT falsely identified 16 patients as becoming febrile (15.6% false positive), while missing only one patient who developed fever in the ED (1% false negative). LCT reliably monitors the dynamic temperature course of ED patients inexpensively and without invasive, complicated instrumentation. We recommend that patients identified as febrile by LCT be checked with an oral or rectal thermometer.

AB - A single temperature measurement recorded on admission to the emergency department provides no information about temperature alterations occurring during the course of evaluation. Continuous monitoring of patients' temperatures in the ED, however, may alter management and decrease morbidity. Our study evaluated the reliability of liquid crystal thermometers (LCTs) and the clinical benefit of continuous temperature monitoring in the ED. Commercially available LCTs (corrected 4° F to reflect core temperature) were applied to the foreheads of randomly selected patients. Serial oral electronic thermometer readings were compared to those obtained by LCT. Fever was defined as a temperature higher than 99.5 F orally or 100 F by LCT. One hundred two patients underwent simultaneous LCT and oral temperature measurements, with a correlation coefficient of 0.661. Hypothermia was not encountered. Eighty-four patients were afebrile, and 18 were febrile by oral measurement on admission. Of the afebrile patients, 13 (15.5%) became febrile while in the ED. The temperature course was identified correctly by LCT in 83.3% of cases. The LCT correctly identified all patients who were febrile on admission, as well as 92.3% of those who developed fever while in the ED. The latter fevers would have been missed by routine single-temperature determination on ED admission. Detection of fever stimulated more aggressive clinical evaluation of these patients. Eight of nine patients who defervesced in response to antipyretic therapy were identified correctly by LCT. LCT falsely identified 16 patients as becoming febrile (15.6% false positive), while missing only one patient who developed fever in the ED (1% false negative). LCT reliably monitors the dynamic temperature course of ED patients inexpensively and without invasive, complicated instrumentation. We recommend that patients identified as febrile by LCT be checked with an oral or rectal thermometer.

KW - temperature, monitoring, methods

KW - thermometry, liquid crystal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022340356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022340356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0196-0644(85)81027-1

DO - 10.1016/S0196-0644(85)81027-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 4061991

AN - SCOPUS:0022340356

VL - 14

SP - 1188

EP - 1190

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 12

ER -