Listener-speaker perceived distance predicts the degree of motor contribution to speech perception

Eleonora Bartoli, Alessandro D'Ausilio, Jeffrey Berry, Leonardo Badino, Thomas G Bever, Luciano Fadiga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Listening speech sounds activates motor and premotor areas in addition to temporal and parietal brain regions. These activations are somatotopically localized according to the effectors recruited in the production of particular phonemes. Previous work demonstrated that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of speech motor centers somatotopically altered speech perception, suggesting a role for the motor system. However, these effects seemed to occur only under adverse listening conditions, suggesting that degraded speech may stimulate listeners to adopt unnatural neural strategies relying on motor centers. Here, we investigated whether naturally occurring interspeaker variability, which did not affect task difficulty, made a speech discrimination task sensitive to TMS interference. In this paradigm, TMS over tongue and lips motor representations somatotopically altered the discrimination time of speech. Furthermore, the TMS-induced effect correlated with listeners' similarity judgments between listeners' and speakers' speech productions. Thus, the degree of motor recruitment depends on the perceived distance between listener and speaker. This result supports the claim that discriminating others' speech pattern requires the contribution of the listener's own motor repertoire. We conclude that motor recruitment in speech perception can be a natural product of discriminating speech in a normally variable and unpredictable environment, not merely related to task difficulty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-288
Number of pages8
JournalCerebral Cortex
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Speech Perception
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Motor Cortex
Parietal Lobe
Phonetics
Lip
Biological Products
Tongue
Brain

Keywords

  • interspeaker variability
  • motor system
  • motor theory
  • speech perception
  • TMS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Listener-speaker perceived distance predicts the degree of motor contribution to speech perception. / Bartoli, Eleonora; D'Ausilio, Alessandro; Berry, Jeffrey; Badino, Leonardo; Bever, Thomas G; Fadiga, Luciano.

In: Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2015, p. 281-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bartoli, Eleonora ; D'Ausilio, Alessandro ; Berry, Jeffrey ; Badino, Leonardo ; Bever, Thomas G ; Fadiga, Luciano. / Listener-speaker perceived distance predicts the degree of motor contribution to speech perception. In: Cerebral Cortex. 2015 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 281-288.
@article{91bf2612eaad441fbb73366631dc791f,
title = "Listener-speaker perceived distance predicts the degree of motor contribution to speech perception",
abstract = "Listening speech sounds activates motor and premotor areas in addition to temporal and parietal brain regions. These activations are somatotopically localized according to the effectors recruited in the production of particular phonemes. Previous work demonstrated that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of speech motor centers somatotopically altered speech perception, suggesting a role for the motor system. However, these effects seemed to occur only under adverse listening conditions, suggesting that degraded speech may stimulate listeners to adopt unnatural neural strategies relying on motor centers. Here, we investigated whether naturally occurring interspeaker variability, which did not affect task difficulty, made a speech discrimination task sensitive to TMS interference. In this paradigm, TMS over tongue and lips motor representations somatotopically altered the discrimination time of speech. Furthermore, the TMS-induced effect correlated with listeners' similarity judgments between listeners' and speakers' speech productions. Thus, the degree of motor recruitment depends on the perceived distance between listener and speaker. This result supports the claim that discriminating others' speech pattern requires the contribution of the listener's own motor repertoire. We conclude that motor recruitment in speech perception can be a natural product of discriminating speech in a normally variable and unpredictable environment, not merely related to task difficulty.",
keywords = "interspeaker variability, motor system, motor theory, speech perception, TMS",
author = "Eleonora Bartoli and Alessandro D'Ausilio and Jeffrey Berry and Leonardo Badino and Bever, {Thomas G} and Luciano Fadiga",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1093/cercor/bht257",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "281--288",
journal = "Cerebral Cortex",
issn = "1047-3211",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Listener-speaker perceived distance predicts the degree of motor contribution to speech perception

AU - Bartoli, Eleonora

AU - D'Ausilio, Alessandro

AU - Berry, Jeffrey

AU - Badino, Leonardo

AU - Bever, Thomas G

AU - Fadiga, Luciano

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Listening speech sounds activates motor and premotor areas in addition to temporal and parietal brain regions. These activations are somatotopically localized according to the effectors recruited in the production of particular phonemes. Previous work demonstrated that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of speech motor centers somatotopically altered speech perception, suggesting a role for the motor system. However, these effects seemed to occur only under adverse listening conditions, suggesting that degraded speech may stimulate listeners to adopt unnatural neural strategies relying on motor centers. Here, we investigated whether naturally occurring interspeaker variability, which did not affect task difficulty, made a speech discrimination task sensitive to TMS interference. In this paradigm, TMS over tongue and lips motor representations somatotopically altered the discrimination time of speech. Furthermore, the TMS-induced effect correlated with listeners' similarity judgments between listeners' and speakers' speech productions. Thus, the degree of motor recruitment depends on the perceived distance between listener and speaker. This result supports the claim that discriminating others' speech pattern requires the contribution of the listener's own motor repertoire. We conclude that motor recruitment in speech perception can be a natural product of discriminating speech in a normally variable and unpredictable environment, not merely related to task difficulty.

AB - Listening speech sounds activates motor and premotor areas in addition to temporal and parietal brain regions. These activations are somatotopically localized according to the effectors recruited in the production of particular phonemes. Previous work demonstrated that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of speech motor centers somatotopically altered speech perception, suggesting a role for the motor system. However, these effects seemed to occur only under adverse listening conditions, suggesting that degraded speech may stimulate listeners to adopt unnatural neural strategies relying on motor centers. Here, we investigated whether naturally occurring interspeaker variability, which did not affect task difficulty, made a speech discrimination task sensitive to TMS interference. In this paradigm, TMS over tongue and lips motor representations somatotopically altered the discrimination time of speech. Furthermore, the TMS-induced effect correlated with listeners' similarity judgments between listeners' and speakers' speech productions. Thus, the degree of motor recruitment depends on the perceived distance between listener and speaker. This result supports the claim that discriminating others' speech pattern requires the contribution of the listener's own motor repertoire. We conclude that motor recruitment in speech perception can be a natural product of discriminating speech in a normally variable and unpredictable environment, not merely related to task difficulty.

KW - interspeaker variability

KW - motor system

KW - motor theory

KW - speech perception

KW - TMS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924932087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924932087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/cercor/bht257

DO - 10.1093/cercor/bht257

M3 - Article

C2 - 24046079

AN - SCOPUS:84924932087

VL - 25

SP - 281

EP - 288

JO - Cerebral Cortex

JF - Cerebral Cortex

SN - 1047-3211

IS - 2

ER -