Locality domains and morphological rules: Phases, heads, node-sprouting and suppletion in Korean honorification

Jaehoon Choi, Heidi B Harley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Korean subject honorification and Korean negation have both affixal and suppletive exponents. In addition, Korean negation has a periphrastic realization involving an auxiliary verb. By examining their interaction, we motivate several hypotheses concerning locality constraints on the conditioning of suppletion and the insertion of dissociated morphemes (‘node-sprouting’). At the same time, we come to a better understanding of the nature of Korean subject honorification. We show that Korean honorific morphemes are ‘dissociated’ or ‘sprouted,’ i.e., introduced by morphosyntactic rule in accordance with morphological well-formedness constraints, like many other agreement morphemes. We argue that the conditioning domain for node-sprouting is the syntactic phase. In contrast, our data suggest that the conditioning domain for suppletion is the complex X 0 , as proposed by Bobaljik (2012). We show that the ‘spanning’ hypotheses concerning exponence (Merchant 2015; Svenonius 2012), the ‘linear adjacency’ hypotheses (Embick 2010), and ‘accessibility domain’ hypothesis (Moskal 2014, 2015a, 2015b; Moskal and Smith 2016) make incorrect predictions for Korean suppletion. Finally, we argue that competition between honorific and negative suppletive exponents reveals a root-outwards effect in allomorphic conditioning, supporting the idea that insertion of vocabulary items proceeds root-outwards (Bobaljik 2000).

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalNatural Language and Linguistic Theory
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

conditioning
vocabulary
Conditioning
Locality
Morphological Rules
Suppletion
interaction
Morpheme
Negation
Honorifics
Insertion

Keywords

  • Dissociated morphemes
  • Honorification
  • Locality
  • Morphologically conditioned allomorphy
  • Phase
  • Suppletion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{1b757304401d449ba9f5c675db3914c0,
title = "Locality domains and morphological rules: Phases, heads, node-sprouting and suppletion in Korean honorification",
abstract = "Korean subject honorification and Korean negation have both affixal and suppletive exponents. In addition, Korean negation has a periphrastic realization involving an auxiliary verb. By examining their interaction, we motivate several hypotheses concerning locality constraints on the conditioning of suppletion and the insertion of dissociated morphemes (‘node-sprouting’). At the same time, we come to a better understanding of the nature of Korean subject honorification. We show that Korean honorific morphemes are ‘dissociated’ or ‘sprouted,’ i.e., introduced by morphosyntactic rule in accordance with morphological well-formedness constraints, like many other agreement morphemes. We argue that the conditioning domain for node-sprouting is the syntactic phase. In contrast, our data suggest that the conditioning domain for suppletion is the complex X 0 , as proposed by Bobaljik (2012). We show that the ‘spanning’ hypotheses concerning exponence (Merchant 2015; Svenonius 2012), the ‘linear adjacency’ hypotheses (Embick 2010), and ‘accessibility domain’ hypothesis (Moskal 2014, 2015a, 2015b; Moskal and Smith 2016) make incorrect predictions for Korean suppletion. Finally, we argue that competition between honorific and negative suppletive exponents reveals a root-outwards effect in allomorphic conditioning, supporting the idea that insertion of vocabulary items proceeds root-outwards (Bobaljik 2000).",
keywords = "Dissociated morphemes, Honorification, Locality, Morphologically conditioned allomorphy, Phase, Suppletion",
author = "Jaehoon Choi and Harley, {Heidi B}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11049-018-09438-3",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Natural Language and Linguistic Theory",
issn = "0167-806X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Locality domains and morphological rules

T2 - Phases, heads, node-sprouting and suppletion in Korean honorification

AU - Choi, Jaehoon

AU - Harley, Heidi B

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Korean subject honorification and Korean negation have both affixal and suppletive exponents. In addition, Korean negation has a periphrastic realization involving an auxiliary verb. By examining their interaction, we motivate several hypotheses concerning locality constraints on the conditioning of suppletion and the insertion of dissociated morphemes (‘node-sprouting’). At the same time, we come to a better understanding of the nature of Korean subject honorification. We show that Korean honorific morphemes are ‘dissociated’ or ‘sprouted,’ i.e., introduced by morphosyntactic rule in accordance with morphological well-formedness constraints, like many other agreement morphemes. We argue that the conditioning domain for node-sprouting is the syntactic phase. In contrast, our data suggest that the conditioning domain for suppletion is the complex X 0 , as proposed by Bobaljik (2012). We show that the ‘spanning’ hypotheses concerning exponence (Merchant 2015; Svenonius 2012), the ‘linear adjacency’ hypotheses (Embick 2010), and ‘accessibility domain’ hypothesis (Moskal 2014, 2015a, 2015b; Moskal and Smith 2016) make incorrect predictions for Korean suppletion. Finally, we argue that competition between honorific and negative suppletive exponents reveals a root-outwards effect in allomorphic conditioning, supporting the idea that insertion of vocabulary items proceeds root-outwards (Bobaljik 2000).

AB - Korean subject honorification and Korean negation have both affixal and suppletive exponents. In addition, Korean negation has a periphrastic realization involving an auxiliary verb. By examining their interaction, we motivate several hypotheses concerning locality constraints on the conditioning of suppletion and the insertion of dissociated morphemes (‘node-sprouting’). At the same time, we come to a better understanding of the nature of Korean subject honorification. We show that Korean honorific morphemes are ‘dissociated’ or ‘sprouted,’ i.e., introduced by morphosyntactic rule in accordance with morphological well-formedness constraints, like many other agreement morphemes. We argue that the conditioning domain for node-sprouting is the syntactic phase. In contrast, our data suggest that the conditioning domain for suppletion is the complex X 0 , as proposed by Bobaljik (2012). We show that the ‘spanning’ hypotheses concerning exponence (Merchant 2015; Svenonius 2012), the ‘linear adjacency’ hypotheses (Embick 2010), and ‘accessibility domain’ hypothesis (Moskal 2014, 2015a, 2015b; Moskal and Smith 2016) make incorrect predictions for Korean suppletion. Finally, we argue that competition between honorific and negative suppletive exponents reveals a root-outwards effect in allomorphic conditioning, supporting the idea that insertion of vocabulary items proceeds root-outwards (Bobaljik 2000).

KW - Dissociated morphemes

KW - Honorification

KW - Locality

KW - Morphologically conditioned allomorphy

KW - Phase

KW - Suppletion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062773157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062773157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11049-018-09438-3

DO - 10.1007/s11049-018-09438-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062773157

JO - Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

JF - Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

SN - 0167-806X

ER -