Locating Major League Stadiums Where They Can Make a Difference: Empirical Analysis with Implications for All Major Public Venues

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The louder policy analysts complain about using public resources to subsidize the construction of new major league sports stadiums, the more subsidies are made, despite empirical evidence showing that public investments in stadiums to lure or keep major league teams have considerable opportunity costs. Policy analysts should consider shifting the emphasis of their work to evaluate where building stadiums would minimize opportunity costs or maximize economic interactions among locations. This article uses time-series analysis of 25 metropolitan areas to show that in terms of capturing share of economic activity, the best location for professional sports stadiums appears to be the downtown (including the central business district and nearby “edge” areas), followed by other locations in the central city. Suburban locations appear to be associated with the least amount of economic activity. This analysis has broad implications for all major public investments aimed at attracting people to sports, recreation, culture, and public assembly venues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)98-114
Number of pages17
JournalPublic Works Management & Policy
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

public investment
opportunity costs
Sports
professional sports
economics
time series analysis
city center
recreation
subsidy
agglomeration area
district
Stadium
Empirical analysis
interaction
resources
evidence
Economic activity
Opportunity cost
Public investment
Analysts

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

@article{cdba772b0c7040b8b9e6e942f55a599e,
title = "Locating Major League Stadiums Where They Can Make a Difference: Empirical Analysis with Implications for All Major Public Venues",
abstract = "The louder policy analysts complain about using public resources to subsidize the construction of new major league sports stadiums, the more subsidies are made, despite empirical evidence showing that public investments in stadiums to lure or keep major league teams have considerable opportunity costs. Policy analysts should consider shifting the emphasis of their work to evaluate where building stadiums would minimize opportunity costs or maximize economic interactions among locations. This article uses time-series analysis of 25 metropolitan areas to show that in terms of capturing share of economic activity, the best location for professional sports stadiums appears to be the downtown (including the central business district and nearby “edge” areas), followed by other locations in the central city. Suburban locations appear to be associated with the least amount of economic activity. This analysis has broad implications for all major public investments aimed at attracting people to sports, recreation, culture, and public assembly venues.",
author = "Nelson, {Arthur Christian}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1177/108772402236952",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "98--114",
journal = "Public Works Management and Policy",
issn = "1087-724X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Locating Major League Stadiums Where They Can Make a Difference

T2 - Empirical Analysis with Implications for All Major Public Venues

AU - Nelson, Arthur Christian

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The louder policy analysts complain about using public resources to subsidize the construction of new major league sports stadiums, the more subsidies are made, despite empirical evidence showing that public investments in stadiums to lure or keep major league teams have considerable opportunity costs. Policy analysts should consider shifting the emphasis of their work to evaluate where building stadiums would minimize opportunity costs or maximize economic interactions among locations. This article uses time-series analysis of 25 metropolitan areas to show that in terms of capturing share of economic activity, the best location for professional sports stadiums appears to be the downtown (including the central business district and nearby “edge” areas), followed by other locations in the central city. Suburban locations appear to be associated with the least amount of economic activity. This analysis has broad implications for all major public investments aimed at attracting people to sports, recreation, culture, and public assembly venues.

AB - The louder policy analysts complain about using public resources to subsidize the construction of new major league sports stadiums, the more subsidies are made, despite empirical evidence showing that public investments in stadiums to lure or keep major league teams have considerable opportunity costs. Policy analysts should consider shifting the emphasis of their work to evaluate where building stadiums would minimize opportunity costs or maximize economic interactions among locations. This article uses time-series analysis of 25 metropolitan areas to show that in terms of capturing share of economic activity, the best location for professional sports stadiums appears to be the downtown (including the central business district and nearby “edge” areas), followed by other locations in the central city. Suburban locations appear to be associated with the least amount of economic activity. This analysis has broad implications for all major public investments aimed at attracting people to sports, recreation, culture, and public assembly venues.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992829338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992829338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/108772402236952

DO - 10.1177/108772402236952

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84992829338

VL - 7

SP - 98

EP - 114

JO - Public Works Management and Policy

JF - Public Works Management and Policy

SN - 1087-724X

IS - 2

ER -