Looking through the same lens: Shear calibration for LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST with stage 4 CMB lensing

Emmanuel Schaan, Elisabeth Krause, Tim Eifler, Olivier Doré, Hironao Miyatake, Jason Rhodes, David N. Spergel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The next-generation weak lensing surveys (i.e., LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST) will require exquisite control over systematic effects. In this paper, we address shear calibration and present the most realistic forecast to date for LSST/Euclid/WFIRST and CMB lensing from a stage 4 CMB experiment ("CMB S4"). We use the cosmolike code to simulate a joint analysis of all the two-point functions of galaxy density, galaxy shear, and CMB lensing convergence. We include the full Gaussian and non-Gaussian covariances and explore the resulting joint likelihood with Monte Carlo Markov chains. We constrain shear calibration biases while simultaneously varying cosmological parameters, galaxy biases, and photometric redshift uncertainties. We find that CMB lensing from CMB S4 enables the calibration of the shear biases down to 0.2%-3% in ten tomographic bins for LSST (below the ∼0.5% requirements in most tomographic bins), down to 0.4%-2.4% in ten bins for Euclid, and 0.6%-3.2% in ten bins for WFIRST. For a given lensing survey, the method works best at high redshift where shear calibration is otherwise most challenging. This self-calibration is robust to Gaussian photometric redshift uncertainties and to a reasonable level of intrinsic alignment. It is also robust to changes in the beam and the effectiveness of the component separation of the CMB experiment, and slowly dependent on its depth, making it possible with third-generation CMB experiments such as AdvACT and SPT-3G, as well as the Simons Observatory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPhysical Review D
Volume95
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

lenses
shear
galaxies
Markov chains
forecasting
observatories
alignment
requirements

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Looking through the same lens : Shear calibration for LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST with stage 4 CMB lensing. / Schaan, Emmanuel; Krause, Elisabeth; Eifler, Tim; Doré, Olivier; Miyatake, Hironao; Rhodes, Jason; Spergel, David N.

In: Physical Review D, Vol. 95, No. 12, 15.06.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schaan, Emmanuel ; Krause, Elisabeth ; Eifler, Tim ; Doré, Olivier ; Miyatake, Hironao ; Rhodes, Jason ; Spergel, David N. / Looking through the same lens : Shear calibration for LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST with stage 4 CMB lensing. In: Physical Review D. 2017 ; Vol. 95, No. 12.
@article{bceb5b97ae8441db968e9590c279a5e2,
title = "Looking through the same lens: Shear calibration for LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST with stage 4 CMB lensing",
abstract = "The next-generation weak lensing surveys (i.e., LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST) will require exquisite control over systematic effects. In this paper, we address shear calibration and present the most realistic forecast to date for LSST/Euclid/WFIRST and CMB lensing from a stage 4 CMB experiment ({"}CMB S4{"}). We use the cosmolike code to simulate a joint analysis of all the two-point functions of galaxy density, galaxy shear, and CMB lensing convergence. We include the full Gaussian and non-Gaussian covariances and explore the resulting joint likelihood with Monte Carlo Markov chains. We constrain shear calibration biases while simultaneously varying cosmological parameters, galaxy biases, and photometric redshift uncertainties. We find that CMB lensing from CMB S4 enables the calibration of the shear biases down to 0.2{\%}-3{\%} in ten tomographic bins for LSST (below the ∼0.5{\%} requirements in most tomographic bins), down to 0.4{\%}-2.4{\%} in ten bins for Euclid, and 0.6{\%}-3.2{\%} in ten bins for WFIRST. For a given lensing survey, the method works best at high redshift where shear calibration is otherwise most challenging. This self-calibration is robust to Gaussian photometric redshift uncertainties and to a reasonable level of intrinsic alignment. It is also robust to changes in the beam and the effectiveness of the component separation of the CMB experiment, and slowly dependent on its depth, making it possible with third-generation CMB experiments such as AdvACT and SPT-3G, as well as the Simons Observatory.",
author = "Emmanuel Schaan and Elisabeth Krause and Tim Eifler and Olivier Dor{\'e} and Hironao Miyatake and Jason Rhodes and Spergel, {David N.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevD.95.123512",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
journal = "Physical Review D",
issn = "2470-0010",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Looking through the same lens

T2 - Shear calibration for LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST with stage 4 CMB lensing

AU - Schaan, Emmanuel

AU - Krause, Elisabeth

AU - Eifler, Tim

AU - Doré, Olivier

AU - Miyatake, Hironao

AU - Rhodes, Jason

AU - Spergel, David N.

PY - 2017/6/15

Y1 - 2017/6/15

N2 - The next-generation weak lensing surveys (i.e., LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST) will require exquisite control over systematic effects. In this paper, we address shear calibration and present the most realistic forecast to date for LSST/Euclid/WFIRST and CMB lensing from a stage 4 CMB experiment ("CMB S4"). We use the cosmolike code to simulate a joint analysis of all the two-point functions of galaxy density, galaxy shear, and CMB lensing convergence. We include the full Gaussian and non-Gaussian covariances and explore the resulting joint likelihood with Monte Carlo Markov chains. We constrain shear calibration biases while simultaneously varying cosmological parameters, galaxy biases, and photometric redshift uncertainties. We find that CMB lensing from CMB S4 enables the calibration of the shear biases down to 0.2%-3% in ten tomographic bins for LSST (below the ∼0.5% requirements in most tomographic bins), down to 0.4%-2.4% in ten bins for Euclid, and 0.6%-3.2% in ten bins for WFIRST. For a given lensing survey, the method works best at high redshift where shear calibration is otherwise most challenging. This self-calibration is robust to Gaussian photometric redshift uncertainties and to a reasonable level of intrinsic alignment. It is also robust to changes in the beam and the effectiveness of the component separation of the CMB experiment, and slowly dependent on its depth, making it possible with third-generation CMB experiments such as AdvACT and SPT-3G, as well as the Simons Observatory.

AB - The next-generation weak lensing surveys (i.e., LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST) will require exquisite control over systematic effects. In this paper, we address shear calibration and present the most realistic forecast to date for LSST/Euclid/WFIRST and CMB lensing from a stage 4 CMB experiment ("CMB S4"). We use the cosmolike code to simulate a joint analysis of all the two-point functions of galaxy density, galaxy shear, and CMB lensing convergence. We include the full Gaussian and non-Gaussian covariances and explore the resulting joint likelihood with Monte Carlo Markov chains. We constrain shear calibration biases while simultaneously varying cosmological parameters, galaxy biases, and photometric redshift uncertainties. We find that CMB lensing from CMB S4 enables the calibration of the shear biases down to 0.2%-3% in ten tomographic bins for LSST (below the ∼0.5% requirements in most tomographic bins), down to 0.4%-2.4% in ten bins for Euclid, and 0.6%-3.2% in ten bins for WFIRST. For a given lensing survey, the method works best at high redshift where shear calibration is otherwise most challenging. This self-calibration is robust to Gaussian photometric redshift uncertainties and to a reasonable level of intrinsic alignment. It is also robust to changes in the beam and the effectiveness of the component separation of the CMB experiment, and slowly dependent on its depth, making it possible with third-generation CMB experiments such as AdvACT and SPT-3G, as well as the Simons Observatory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85022346673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85022346673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.123512

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.123512

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85022346673

VL - 95

JO - Physical Review D

JF - Physical Review D

SN - 2470-0010

IS - 12

ER -