Looking Time Predicts Choice but Not Aesthetic Value

Eve A. Isham, Joy J. Geng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although visual fixations are commonly used to index stimulus-driven or internally-determined preference, recent evidence suggests that visual fixations can also be a source of decisional bias that moves selection toward the fixated object. These contrasting results raise the question of whether visual fixations always index comparative processes during choice-based tasks, or whether they might better reflect internal preferences when the decision does not carry any economic or corporeal consequences. In two experiments, participants chose which of two objects were more aesthetically pleasing (Exp.1) or appeared more organic (Exp.2), and provided independent aesthetic ratings of the stimuli. Our results demonstrated that fixation parameters were a better index of choice in both decisional domains than of aesthetic preference. The data support models in which visual fixations are specifically related to the evolution of decision processes even when the decision has no tangible consequences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere71698
JournalPloS one
Volume8
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 16 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

aesthetics
Esthetics
Economics
Selection Bias
Experiments
economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • General

Cite this

Looking Time Predicts Choice but Not Aesthetic Value. / Isham, Eve A.; Geng, Joy J.

In: PloS one, Vol. 8, No. 8, e71698, 16.08.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{01b073189b434dafb200b631799a6fe7,
title = "Looking Time Predicts Choice but Not Aesthetic Value",
abstract = "Although visual fixations are commonly used to index stimulus-driven or internally-determined preference, recent evidence suggests that visual fixations can also be a source of decisional bias that moves selection toward the fixated object. These contrasting results raise the question of whether visual fixations always index comparative processes during choice-based tasks, or whether they might better reflect internal preferences when the decision does not carry any economic or corporeal consequences. In two experiments, participants chose which of two objects were more aesthetically pleasing (Exp.1) or appeared more organic (Exp.2), and provided independent aesthetic ratings of the stimuli. Our results demonstrated that fixation parameters were a better index of choice in both decisional domains than of aesthetic preference. The data support models in which visual fixations are specifically related to the evolution of decision processes even when the decision has no tangible consequences.",
author = "Isham, {Eve A.} and Geng, {Joy J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0071698",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Looking Time Predicts Choice but Not Aesthetic Value

AU - Isham, Eve A.

AU - Geng, Joy J.

PY - 2013/8/16

Y1 - 2013/8/16

N2 - Although visual fixations are commonly used to index stimulus-driven or internally-determined preference, recent evidence suggests that visual fixations can also be a source of decisional bias that moves selection toward the fixated object. These contrasting results raise the question of whether visual fixations always index comparative processes during choice-based tasks, or whether they might better reflect internal preferences when the decision does not carry any economic or corporeal consequences. In two experiments, participants chose which of two objects were more aesthetically pleasing (Exp.1) or appeared more organic (Exp.2), and provided independent aesthetic ratings of the stimuli. Our results demonstrated that fixation parameters were a better index of choice in both decisional domains than of aesthetic preference. The data support models in which visual fixations are specifically related to the evolution of decision processes even when the decision has no tangible consequences.

AB - Although visual fixations are commonly used to index stimulus-driven or internally-determined preference, recent evidence suggests that visual fixations can also be a source of decisional bias that moves selection toward the fixated object. These contrasting results raise the question of whether visual fixations always index comparative processes during choice-based tasks, or whether they might better reflect internal preferences when the decision does not carry any economic or corporeal consequences. In two experiments, participants chose which of two objects were more aesthetically pleasing (Exp.1) or appeared more organic (Exp.2), and provided independent aesthetic ratings of the stimuli. Our results demonstrated that fixation parameters were a better index of choice in both decisional domains than of aesthetic preference. The data support models in which visual fixations are specifically related to the evolution of decision processes even when the decision has no tangible consequences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882722236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882722236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0071698

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0071698

M3 - Article

C2 - 23977115

AN - SCOPUS:84882722236

VL - 8

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 8

M1 - e71698

ER -