Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry "triplet"

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

159 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The idea that chemical knowledge can be represented in three main ways: macro, submicro, and symbolic (chemistry triplet) has become paradigmatic in chemistry and science education. It has served both as the base of theoretical frameworks that guide research in chemical education and as a central idea in various curriculum projects. However, this triplet relationship has been the subject of different adaptations and reinterpretations that sometimes lead to confusion and misunderstanding, which complicates the analysis of the triplet's nature and scope. Thus, the central goal of this paper is to describe some of the existing views of the triplet relationship in chemistry and science education and critically analyse their underlying assumptions. We also propose a general structure of our chemistry knowledge intended to better situate the chemistry triplet in relationship with the different types, scales, dimensions, and approaches that seem to characterise such knowledge. Our proposed model may be useful in the analysis, evaluation, and reflection of educational research results and teaching practices centred on the triplet relationship.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-195
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

chemistry
education
science
educational research
teaching practice
research results
curriculum
evaluation

Keywords

  • Chemistry education
  • Knowledge structure
  • Learning
  • Pedagogical content knowledge
  • Position paper
  • Science education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Macro, submicro, and symbolic : The many faces of the chemistry "triplet". / Talanquer, Vicente A.

In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 33, No. 2, 01.2011, p. 179-195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{17f0de9227964bf7a94338c8236f7275,
title = "Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry {"}triplet{"}",
abstract = "The idea that chemical knowledge can be represented in three main ways: macro, submicro, and symbolic (chemistry triplet) has become paradigmatic in chemistry and science education. It has served both as the base of theoretical frameworks that guide research in chemical education and as a central idea in various curriculum projects. However, this triplet relationship has been the subject of different adaptations and reinterpretations that sometimes lead to confusion and misunderstanding, which complicates the analysis of the triplet's nature and scope. Thus, the central goal of this paper is to describe some of the existing views of the triplet relationship in chemistry and science education and critically analyse their underlying assumptions. We also propose a general structure of our chemistry knowledge intended to better situate the chemistry triplet in relationship with the different types, scales, dimensions, and approaches that seem to characterise such knowledge. Our proposed model may be useful in the analysis, evaluation, and reflection of educational research results and teaching practices centred on the triplet relationship.",
keywords = "Chemistry education, Knowledge structure, Learning, Pedagogical content knowledge, Position paper, Science education",
author = "Talanquer, {Vicente A}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09500690903386435",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "179--195",
journal = "International Journal of Science Education",
issn = "0950-0693",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Macro, submicro, and symbolic

T2 - The many faces of the chemistry "triplet"

AU - Talanquer, Vicente A

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - The idea that chemical knowledge can be represented in three main ways: macro, submicro, and symbolic (chemistry triplet) has become paradigmatic in chemistry and science education. It has served both as the base of theoretical frameworks that guide research in chemical education and as a central idea in various curriculum projects. However, this triplet relationship has been the subject of different adaptations and reinterpretations that sometimes lead to confusion and misunderstanding, which complicates the analysis of the triplet's nature and scope. Thus, the central goal of this paper is to describe some of the existing views of the triplet relationship in chemistry and science education and critically analyse their underlying assumptions. We also propose a general structure of our chemistry knowledge intended to better situate the chemistry triplet in relationship with the different types, scales, dimensions, and approaches that seem to characterise such knowledge. Our proposed model may be useful in the analysis, evaluation, and reflection of educational research results and teaching practices centred on the triplet relationship.

AB - The idea that chemical knowledge can be represented in three main ways: macro, submicro, and symbolic (chemistry triplet) has become paradigmatic in chemistry and science education. It has served both as the base of theoretical frameworks that guide research in chemical education and as a central idea in various curriculum projects. However, this triplet relationship has been the subject of different adaptations and reinterpretations that sometimes lead to confusion and misunderstanding, which complicates the analysis of the triplet's nature and scope. Thus, the central goal of this paper is to describe some of the existing views of the triplet relationship in chemistry and science education and critically analyse their underlying assumptions. We also propose a general structure of our chemistry knowledge intended to better situate the chemistry triplet in relationship with the different types, scales, dimensions, and approaches that seem to characterise such knowledge. Our proposed model may be useful in the analysis, evaluation, and reflection of educational research results and teaching practices centred on the triplet relationship.

KW - Chemistry education

KW - Knowledge structure

KW - Learning

KW - Pedagogical content knowledge

KW - Position paper

KW - Science education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651479934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78651479934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09500690903386435

DO - 10.1080/09500690903386435

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78651479934

VL - 33

SP - 179

EP - 195

JO - International Journal of Science Education

JF - International Journal of Science Education

SN - 0950-0693

IS - 2

ER -