Making or Breaking Politics: Social Conflicts and Party-System Change in Democratic Bolivia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Why do only some social conflicts lead to party-system change? In Bolivia, the recent politicization of the regional autonomy movement represented a stark difference with how conflicts had affected party-system dynamics in the past. This study argues that social conflicts led to party-system change in Bolivia thanks largely to the strategies of ruling party elites. Motivated to preserve their position in power, elites had a menu of strategic options at their disposal to integrate, defer, or disregard demands from below. The study situates the recent regional conflict in Bolivia within the country’s longer history of mobilizational politics. It finds that ruling elites utilized different strategies of exclusion and inclusion to neutralize social conflict and preserve the status quo party system. They appropriated the regional autonomy demands as a last-ditch effort to remain electorally relevant in the face of successful party competition. In so doing, they helped transform the party system. Even from a position of electoral weakness and in the face of overwhelming demands from below, Bolivia’s elites shaped the transformative impact of those demands. This study relies upon a least-likely case design to highlight the impact elite agency can have in making or breaking politics under democracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-303
Number of pages21
JournalStudies in Comparative International Development
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 18 2014

Fingerprint

social conflict
system change
party system
Bolivia
politics
elite
autonomy
power elite
democracy
politicization
transform
exclusion
inclusion
demand
history
ruling
conflict
preserve

Keywords

  • Bolivia
  • Democratization
  • Elite agency
  • Party-system change
  • Representation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{ea11dbc6fc034508b564061b1ee13656,
title = "Making or Breaking Politics: Social Conflicts and Party-System Change in Democratic Bolivia",
abstract = "Why do only some social conflicts lead to party-system change? In Bolivia, the recent politicization of the regional autonomy movement represented a stark difference with how conflicts had affected party-system dynamics in the past. This study argues that social conflicts led to party-system change in Bolivia thanks largely to the strategies of ruling party elites. Motivated to preserve their position in power, elites had a menu of strategic options at their disposal to integrate, defer, or disregard demands from below. The study situates the recent regional conflict in Bolivia within the country’s longer history of mobilizational politics. It finds that ruling elites utilized different strategies of exclusion and inclusion to neutralize social conflict and preserve the status quo party system. They appropriated the regional autonomy demands as a last-ditch effort to remain electorally relevant in the face of successful party competition. In so doing, they helped transform the party system. Even from a position of electoral weakness and in the face of overwhelming demands from below, Bolivia’s elites shaped the transformative impact of those demands. This study relies upon a least-likely case design to highlight the impact elite agency can have in making or breaking politics under democracy.",
keywords = "Bolivia, Democratization, Elite agency, Party-system change, Representation",
author = "Cyr, {Jennifer M}",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1007/s12116-014-9161-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "283--303",
journal = "Studies in Comparative International Development",
issn = "0039-3606",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making or Breaking Politics

T2 - Social Conflicts and Party-System Change in Democratic Bolivia

AU - Cyr, Jennifer M

PY - 2014/6/18

Y1 - 2014/6/18

N2 - Why do only some social conflicts lead to party-system change? In Bolivia, the recent politicization of the regional autonomy movement represented a stark difference with how conflicts had affected party-system dynamics in the past. This study argues that social conflicts led to party-system change in Bolivia thanks largely to the strategies of ruling party elites. Motivated to preserve their position in power, elites had a menu of strategic options at their disposal to integrate, defer, or disregard demands from below. The study situates the recent regional conflict in Bolivia within the country’s longer history of mobilizational politics. It finds that ruling elites utilized different strategies of exclusion and inclusion to neutralize social conflict and preserve the status quo party system. They appropriated the regional autonomy demands as a last-ditch effort to remain electorally relevant in the face of successful party competition. In so doing, they helped transform the party system. Even from a position of electoral weakness and in the face of overwhelming demands from below, Bolivia’s elites shaped the transformative impact of those demands. This study relies upon a least-likely case design to highlight the impact elite agency can have in making or breaking politics under democracy.

AB - Why do only some social conflicts lead to party-system change? In Bolivia, the recent politicization of the regional autonomy movement represented a stark difference with how conflicts had affected party-system dynamics in the past. This study argues that social conflicts led to party-system change in Bolivia thanks largely to the strategies of ruling party elites. Motivated to preserve their position in power, elites had a menu of strategic options at their disposal to integrate, defer, or disregard demands from below. The study situates the recent regional conflict in Bolivia within the country’s longer history of mobilizational politics. It finds that ruling elites utilized different strategies of exclusion and inclusion to neutralize social conflict and preserve the status quo party system. They appropriated the regional autonomy demands as a last-ditch effort to remain electorally relevant in the face of successful party competition. In so doing, they helped transform the party system. Even from a position of electoral weakness and in the face of overwhelming demands from below, Bolivia’s elites shaped the transformative impact of those demands. This study relies upon a least-likely case design to highlight the impact elite agency can have in making or breaking politics under democracy.

KW - Bolivia

KW - Democratization

KW - Elite agency

KW - Party-system change

KW - Representation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938751068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938751068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12116-014-9161-3

DO - 10.1007/s12116-014-9161-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84938751068

VL - 50

SP - 283

EP - 303

JO - Studies in Comparative International Development

JF - Studies in Comparative International Development

SN - 0039-3606

IS - 3

ER -