Making rigorous research relevant

Innovating statistical action research

Alexandra Durcikova, Allen S. Lee, Susan A Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper proposes a new type of action research-statistical action research (AR)-along with our guidelines on how to conduct it and how to evaluate it. Statistical AR provides a new toolkit for our discipline that strengthens the scholarly community by contributing to the recent discussion regarding the collaborative nature of qualitative and quantitative techniques. The major methodological contribution of statistical AR is the introduction and demonstration of the use of statistical hypothesis testing in action research, where this contribution is the first instance of not only statistical AR, but also positivist action research, in the information systems discipline. Our approach to AR addresses, from a positivist perspective, perceived weaknesses of AR. Statistical AR fits comfortably within the framework of canonical AR, with the only difference being that statistical AR takes a positivist perspective rather than an interpretive one. As conducted in this study, statistical AR applies, tests, and advances knowledge validation theory in a knowledge management system (KMS) context. The major practical contribution is illustrating to practitioners how to integrate different methods in action research. A secondary practical contribution consists of turning around an instance of an ineffective KMS, as experienced by an organization, into one that is effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-263
Number of pages23
JournalMIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Knowledge management
Information systems
Demonstrations
Testing
Knowledge management systems
Interpretive
Toolkit
Hypothesis testing

Keywords

  • Action research
  • Hypothesis testing
  • Management intervention
  • Positivism
  • Research methods
  • Statistical action research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Information Systems and Management

Cite this

Making rigorous research relevant : Innovating statistical action research. / Durcikova, Alexandra; Lee, Allen S.; Brown, Susan A.

In: MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.03.2018, p. 241-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{624f135e9d144eaf9365bac86ba3c124,
title = "Making rigorous research relevant: Innovating statistical action research",
abstract = "This paper proposes a new type of action research-statistical action research (AR)-along with our guidelines on how to conduct it and how to evaluate it. Statistical AR provides a new toolkit for our discipline that strengthens the scholarly community by contributing to the recent discussion regarding the collaborative nature of qualitative and quantitative techniques. The major methodological contribution of statistical AR is the introduction and demonstration of the use of statistical hypothesis testing in action research, where this contribution is the first instance of not only statistical AR, but also positivist action research, in the information systems discipline. Our approach to AR addresses, from a positivist perspective, perceived weaknesses of AR. Statistical AR fits comfortably within the framework of canonical AR, with the only difference being that statistical AR takes a positivist perspective rather than an interpretive one. As conducted in this study, statistical AR applies, tests, and advances knowledge validation theory in a knowledge management system (KMS) context. The major practical contribution is illustrating to practitioners how to integrate different methods in action research. A secondary practical contribution consists of turning around an instance of an ineffective KMS, as experienced by an organization, into one that is effective.",
keywords = "Action research, Hypothesis testing, Management intervention, Positivism, Research methods, Statistical action research",
author = "Alexandra Durcikova and Lee, {Allen S.} and Brown, {Susan A}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.25300/MISQ/2018/14146",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "241--263",
journal = "MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems",
issn = "0276-7783",
publisher = "Management Information Systems Research Center",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making rigorous research relevant

T2 - Innovating statistical action research

AU - Durcikova, Alexandra

AU - Lee, Allen S.

AU - Brown, Susan A

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - This paper proposes a new type of action research-statistical action research (AR)-along with our guidelines on how to conduct it and how to evaluate it. Statistical AR provides a new toolkit for our discipline that strengthens the scholarly community by contributing to the recent discussion regarding the collaborative nature of qualitative and quantitative techniques. The major methodological contribution of statistical AR is the introduction and demonstration of the use of statistical hypothesis testing in action research, where this contribution is the first instance of not only statistical AR, but also positivist action research, in the information systems discipline. Our approach to AR addresses, from a positivist perspective, perceived weaknesses of AR. Statistical AR fits comfortably within the framework of canonical AR, with the only difference being that statistical AR takes a positivist perspective rather than an interpretive one. As conducted in this study, statistical AR applies, tests, and advances knowledge validation theory in a knowledge management system (KMS) context. The major practical contribution is illustrating to practitioners how to integrate different methods in action research. A secondary practical contribution consists of turning around an instance of an ineffective KMS, as experienced by an organization, into one that is effective.

AB - This paper proposes a new type of action research-statistical action research (AR)-along with our guidelines on how to conduct it and how to evaluate it. Statistical AR provides a new toolkit for our discipline that strengthens the scholarly community by contributing to the recent discussion regarding the collaborative nature of qualitative and quantitative techniques. The major methodological contribution of statistical AR is the introduction and demonstration of the use of statistical hypothesis testing in action research, where this contribution is the first instance of not only statistical AR, but also positivist action research, in the information systems discipline. Our approach to AR addresses, from a positivist perspective, perceived weaknesses of AR. Statistical AR fits comfortably within the framework of canonical AR, with the only difference being that statistical AR takes a positivist perspective rather than an interpretive one. As conducted in this study, statistical AR applies, tests, and advances knowledge validation theory in a knowledge management system (KMS) context. The major practical contribution is illustrating to practitioners how to integrate different methods in action research. A secondary practical contribution consists of turning around an instance of an ineffective KMS, as experienced by an organization, into one that is effective.

KW - Action research

KW - Hypothesis testing

KW - Management intervention

KW - Positivism

KW - Research methods

KW - Statistical action research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041174034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041174034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.25300/MISQ/2018/14146

DO - 10.25300/MISQ/2018/14146

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 241

EP - 263

JO - MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems

JF - MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems

SN - 0276-7783

IS - 1

ER -