Making sense of the interactions between groundwater and streamflow: lessons for water masters and adjudicators

H. Bouwer, Thomas Maddock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effects of groundwater pumping on streamflow are hydrologic issues that often are poorly understood in law. In some states, as illustrated with an Arizona example, different laws govern surface-and groundwater. In reality, however, surface-and groundwater form one continuum and conflicts can arise when different parties use both. How groundwater pumping affects streams depends on the depth to groundwater and whether or not the stream bottom is covered with fine sediment or organic deposits that control seepage. Using the hydrologic concept of capture, we present the basis quantitative aspects of stream-aquifer interactions in four case examples. More quantitative refinements and regional aspects can be achieved with computer models that can closely simulate specific regional or basin-wide systems. Once the broader concepts are sufficiently understood, integrated water management schemes can be developed that best resolve conflicts between the users of surface-and groundwater while protecting third parties, such as public and environmental interests. An underlying principle of these schemes should be the balance between the deisre for good scientific results and the economic reality of securing such results. We recommend steps to achieve the balance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-31
Number of pages13
JournalRivers
Volume6
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

stream flow
streamflow
groundwater
water
pumping
seepage
computer simulation
water management
aquifers
aquifer
basins
economics
sediments
basin
sediment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Making sense of the interactions between groundwater and streamflow : lessons for water masters and adjudicators. / Bouwer, H.; Maddock, Thomas.

In: Rivers, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1997, p. 19-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3c7c66819b7d45ffa2ac5627b3cde357,
title = "Making sense of the interactions between groundwater and streamflow: lessons for water masters and adjudicators",
abstract = "The effects of groundwater pumping on streamflow are hydrologic issues that often are poorly understood in law. In some states, as illustrated with an Arizona example, different laws govern surface-and groundwater. In reality, however, surface-and groundwater form one continuum and conflicts can arise when different parties use both. How groundwater pumping affects streams depends on the depth to groundwater and whether or not the stream bottom is covered with fine sediment or organic deposits that control seepage. Using the hydrologic concept of capture, we present the basis quantitative aspects of stream-aquifer interactions in four case examples. More quantitative refinements and regional aspects can be achieved with computer models that can closely simulate specific regional or basin-wide systems. Once the broader concepts are sufficiently understood, integrated water management schemes can be developed that best resolve conflicts between the users of surface-and groundwater while protecting third parties, such as public and environmental interests. An underlying principle of these schemes should be the balance between the deisre for good scientific results and the economic reality of securing such results. We recommend steps to achieve the balance.",
author = "H. Bouwer and Thomas Maddock",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "19--31",
journal = "Rivers",
issn = "0898-8048",
publisher = "S.E.L. & Associates",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making sense of the interactions between groundwater and streamflow

T2 - lessons for water masters and adjudicators

AU - Bouwer, H.

AU - Maddock, Thomas

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - The effects of groundwater pumping on streamflow are hydrologic issues that often are poorly understood in law. In some states, as illustrated with an Arizona example, different laws govern surface-and groundwater. In reality, however, surface-and groundwater form one continuum and conflicts can arise when different parties use both. How groundwater pumping affects streams depends on the depth to groundwater and whether or not the stream bottom is covered with fine sediment or organic deposits that control seepage. Using the hydrologic concept of capture, we present the basis quantitative aspects of stream-aquifer interactions in four case examples. More quantitative refinements and regional aspects can be achieved with computer models that can closely simulate specific regional or basin-wide systems. Once the broader concepts are sufficiently understood, integrated water management schemes can be developed that best resolve conflicts between the users of surface-and groundwater while protecting third parties, such as public and environmental interests. An underlying principle of these schemes should be the balance between the deisre for good scientific results and the economic reality of securing such results. We recommend steps to achieve the balance.

AB - The effects of groundwater pumping on streamflow are hydrologic issues that often are poorly understood in law. In some states, as illustrated with an Arizona example, different laws govern surface-and groundwater. In reality, however, surface-and groundwater form one continuum and conflicts can arise when different parties use both. How groundwater pumping affects streams depends on the depth to groundwater and whether or not the stream bottom is covered with fine sediment or organic deposits that control seepage. Using the hydrologic concept of capture, we present the basis quantitative aspects of stream-aquifer interactions in four case examples. More quantitative refinements and regional aspects can be achieved with computer models that can closely simulate specific regional or basin-wide systems. Once the broader concepts are sufficiently understood, integrated water management schemes can be developed that best resolve conflicts between the users of surface-and groundwater while protecting third parties, such as public and environmental interests. An underlying principle of these schemes should be the balance between the deisre for good scientific results and the economic reality of securing such results. We recommend steps to achieve the balance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031404627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031404627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031404627

VL - 6

SP - 19

EP - 31

JO - Rivers

JF - Rivers

SN - 0898-8048

IS - 1

ER -