Abstract
Sequences, mixtures, rotations, and mosaics are potential strategies for using more than one pesticide to manage pest populations and for slowing the evolution of pesticide resistance. Results from theoretical models suggest that, under certain conditions, mixtures might be especially effective for resistance management. The assumptions of such models, however, are probably not widely applicable. Potential disadvantages associated with mixtures that are usually not considered in modeling studies include disruption of biological control, promotion of resistance in secondary pests, and intense selection for cross-resistance. Results from limited experimental work suggest that pesticide combinations do not consistently suppress resistance development. More thorough evaluation of tactics that seek to optimize benefits of more than one insecticide will require rigorous experiments with the particular pest and pesticide combinations. Because of the difficulty in generalizing results across systems and the potential negative effects of multiple insecticide use, emphasis on minimizing insecticide use is recommended.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1263-1269 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Journal of Economic Entomology |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| State | Published - Oct 1989 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Insect Science
Cite this
Managing resistance with multiple pesticide tactics : theory, evidence, and recommendations. / Tabashnik, Bruce E.
In: Journal of Economic Entomology, Vol. 82, No. 5, 10.1989, p. 1263-1269.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Managing resistance with multiple pesticide tactics
T2 - theory, evidence, and recommendations.
AU - Tabashnik, Bruce E
PY - 1989/10
Y1 - 1989/10
N2 - Sequences, mixtures, rotations, and mosaics are potential strategies for using more than one pesticide to manage pest populations and for slowing the evolution of pesticide resistance. Results from theoretical models suggest that, under certain conditions, mixtures might be especially effective for resistance management. The assumptions of such models, however, are probably not widely applicable. Potential disadvantages associated with mixtures that are usually not considered in modeling studies include disruption of biological control, promotion of resistance in secondary pests, and intense selection for cross-resistance. Results from limited experimental work suggest that pesticide combinations do not consistently suppress resistance development. More thorough evaluation of tactics that seek to optimize benefits of more than one insecticide will require rigorous experiments with the particular pest and pesticide combinations. Because of the difficulty in generalizing results across systems and the potential negative effects of multiple insecticide use, emphasis on minimizing insecticide use is recommended.
AB - Sequences, mixtures, rotations, and mosaics are potential strategies for using more than one pesticide to manage pest populations and for slowing the evolution of pesticide resistance. Results from theoretical models suggest that, under certain conditions, mixtures might be especially effective for resistance management. The assumptions of such models, however, are probably not widely applicable. Potential disadvantages associated with mixtures that are usually not considered in modeling studies include disruption of biological control, promotion of resistance in secondary pests, and intense selection for cross-resistance. Results from limited experimental work suggest that pesticide combinations do not consistently suppress resistance development. More thorough evaluation of tactics that seek to optimize benefits of more than one insecticide will require rigorous experiments with the particular pest and pesticide combinations. Because of the difficulty in generalizing results across systems and the potential negative effects of multiple insecticide use, emphasis on minimizing insecticide use is recommended.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024746338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024746338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 2689487
AN - SCOPUS:0024746338
VL - 82
SP - 1263
EP - 1269
JO - Journal of Economic Entomology
JF - Journal of Economic Entomology
SN - 0022-0493
IS - 5
ER -