Abstract
In this paper I critically assess Derk Pereboom’s book, Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. In it, I resist Pereboom’s manipulation argument for incompatibilism and his indictment of desert-based accounts of moral responsibility.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-15 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Criminal Law and Philosophy |
DOIs | |
State | Accepted/In press - Jan 5 2016 |
Keywords
- Basic desert
- Derk Pereboom
- Desert
- Hardline reply to manipulation argument
- Manipulation argument
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Law
- Philosophy