Manipulation Arguments, Basic Desert, and Moral Responsibility: Assessing Derk Pereboom’s Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life

Michael S McKenna

doi:10.1007/s11572-015-9388-8

Manipulation Arguments, Basic Desert, and Moral Responsibility: Assessing Derk Pereboom’s Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life

Michael S McKenna

Philosophy of Freedom, Center for

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper I critically assess Derk Pereboom’s book, Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. In it, I resist Pereboom’s manipulation argument for incompatibilism and his indictment of desert-based accounts of moral responsibility.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1-15
Number of pages	15
Journal	Criminal Law and Philosophy
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-015-9388-8
State	Accepted/In press - Jan 5 2016

Keywords

Basic desert
Derk Pereboom
Desert
Hardline reply to manipulation argument
Manipulation argument

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Law
Philosophy

Access to Document

10.1007/s11572-015-9388-8

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Manipulation Arguments, Basic Desert, and Moral Responsibility: Assessing Derk Pereboom’s Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

McKenna, M. S. (Accepted/In press). Manipulation Arguments, Basic Desert, and Moral Responsibility: Assessing Derk Pereboom’s Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-015-9388-8

@article{99abf30d996345d3870a1c242d34be8c,

title = "Manipulation Arguments, Basic Desert, and Moral Responsibility: Assessing Derk Pereboom{\textquoteright}s Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life",

abstract = "In this paper I critically assess Derk Pereboom{\textquoteright}s book, Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. In it, I resist Pereboom{\textquoteright}s manipulation argument for incompatibilism and his indictment of desert-based accounts of moral responsibility.",

keywords = "Basic desert, Derk Pereboom, Desert, Hardline reply to manipulation argument, Manipulation argument",

author = "McKenna, {Michael S}",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

day = "5",

doi = "10.1007/s11572-015-9388-8",

language = "English (US)",

pages = "1--15",

journal = "Criminal Law and Philosophy",

issn = "1871-9791",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Manipulation Arguments, Basic Desert, and Moral Responsibility

T2 - Assessing Derk Pereboom’s Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life

AU - McKenna, Michael S

PY - 2016/1/5

Y1 - 2016/1/5

N2 - In this paper I critically assess Derk Pereboom’s book, Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. In it, I resist Pereboom’s manipulation argument for incompatibilism and his indictment of desert-based accounts of moral responsibility.

AB - In this paper I critically assess Derk Pereboom’s book, Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. In it, I resist Pereboom’s manipulation argument for incompatibilism and his indictment of desert-based accounts of moral responsibility.

KW - Basic desert

KW - Derk Pereboom

KW - Desert

KW - Hardline reply to manipulation argument

KW - Manipulation argument

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953270982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953270982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11572-015-9388-8

DO - 10.1007/s11572-015-9388-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84953270982

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Criminal Law and Philosophy

JF - Criminal Law and Philosophy

SN - 1871-9791

ER -