Mapping students' modes of reasoning when thinking about chemical reactions used to make a desired product

M. L. Weinrich, Vicente A Talanquer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The central goal of this study was to analyze the complexity of students' explanations about how and why chemical reactions happen in terms of the types of causal connections students built between expressed concepts and ideas. We were particularly interested in characterizing differences in the types of reasoning applied by students with different levels of training in the chemistry, from college to graduate school. Using a qualitative research approach, we identified diverse modes of reasoning expressed by students when engaged in the analysis of different sets of chemical reactions selected to produce a targeted compound. Main findings indicate that dominant modes of reasoning varied with educational level and the nature of the task. Although participants applied diverse modes of reasoning, linear causal reasoning was prevalent across educational levels and types of tasks. Many students tended to generate explanations based on the identification of a single agent that caused a sequential chain of events. Advanced undergraduate students in our sample generated the most complex explanations. The results of our study have important implications for the development of causal mechanistic reasoning in chemistry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)394-406
Number of pages13
JournalChemistry Education Research and Practice
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Chemical reactions
Students
student
chemistry
school graduate
research approach
qualitative research
event

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry (miscellaneous)
  • Education

Cite this

@article{c4f7041317704cedae0c5b1d30a8992e,
title = "Mapping students' modes of reasoning when thinking about chemical reactions used to make a desired product",
abstract = "The central goal of this study was to analyze the complexity of students' explanations about how and why chemical reactions happen in terms of the types of causal connections students built between expressed concepts and ideas. We were particularly interested in characterizing differences in the types of reasoning applied by students with different levels of training in the chemistry, from college to graduate school. Using a qualitative research approach, we identified diverse modes of reasoning expressed by students when engaged in the analysis of different sets of chemical reactions selected to produce a targeted compound. Main findings indicate that dominant modes of reasoning varied with educational level and the nature of the task. Although participants applied diverse modes of reasoning, linear causal reasoning was prevalent across educational levels and types of tasks. Many students tended to generate explanations based on the identification of a single agent that caused a sequential chain of events. Advanced undergraduate students in our sample generated the most complex explanations. The results of our study have important implications for the development of causal mechanistic reasoning in chemistry.",
author = "Weinrich, {M. L.} and Talanquer, {Vicente A}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1039/c5rp00208g",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "394--406",
journal = "Chemistry Education Research and Practice",
issn = "1109-4028",
publisher = "Ioannina University School of Medicine",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping students' modes of reasoning when thinking about chemical reactions used to make a desired product

AU - Weinrich, M. L.

AU - Talanquer, Vicente A

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The central goal of this study was to analyze the complexity of students' explanations about how and why chemical reactions happen in terms of the types of causal connections students built between expressed concepts and ideas. We were particularly interested in characterizing differences in the types of reasoning applied by students with different levels of training in the chemistry, from college to graduate school. Using a qualitative research approach, we identified diverse modes of reasoning expressed by students when engaged in the analysis of different sets of chemical reactions selected to produce a targeted compound. Main findings indicate that dominant modes of reasoning varied with educational level and the nature of the task. Although participants applied diverse modes of reasoning, linear causal reasoning was prevalent across educational levels and types of tasks. Many students tended to generate explanations based on the identification of a single agent that caused a sequential chain of events. Advanced undergraduate students in our sample generated the most complex explanations. The results of our study have important implications for the development of causal mechanistic reasoning in chemistry.

AB - The central goal of this study was to analyze the complexity of students' explanations about how and why chemical reactions happen in terms of the types of causal connections students built between expressed concepts and ideas. We were particularly interested in characterizing differences in the types of reasoning applied by students with different levels of training in the chemistry, from college to graduate school. Using a qualitative research approach, we identified diverse modes of reasoning expressed by students when engaged in the analysis of different sets of chemical reactions selected to produce a targeted compound. Main findings indicate that dominant modes of reasoning varied with educational level and the nature of the task. Although participants applied diverse modes of reasoning, linear causal reasoning was prevalent across educational levels and types of tasks. Many students tended to generate explanations based on the identification of a single agent that caused a sequential chain of events. Advanced undergraduate students in our sample generated the most complex explanations. The results of our study have important implications for the development of causal mechanistic reasoning in chemistry.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016433489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016433489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1039/c5rp00208g

DO - 10.1039/c5rp00208g

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85016433489

VL - 17

SP - 394

EP - 406

JO - Chemistry Education Research and Practice

JF - Chemistry Education Research and Practice

SN - 1109-4028

IS - 2

ER -