Mapping the contemporary terrorism research domain

Edna F. Reid, Hsinchun Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A systematic view of terrorism research to reveal the intellectual structure of the field and empirically discern the distinct set of core researchers, institutional affiliations, publications, and conceptual areas can help us gain a deeper understanding of approaches to terrorism. This paper responds to this need by using an integrated knowledge-mapping framework that we developed to identify the core researchers and knowledge creation approaches in terrorism. The framework uses three types of analysis: (a) basic analysis of scientific output using citation, bibliometric, and social network analyses, (b) content map analysis of large corpora of literature, and (c) co-citation analysis to analyse linkages among pairs of researchers. We applied domain visualization techniques such as content map analysis, block-modeling, and co-citation analysis to the literature and author citation data from the years 1965 to 2003. The data were gathered from ten databases such as the ISI Web of Science. The results reveal: (1) the names of the top 42 core terrorism researchers (e.g., Brian Jenkins, Bruce Hoffman, and Paul Wilkinson) as well as their institutional affiliations; (2) their influential publications; (3) clusters of terrorism researchers who work in similar areas; and (4) that the research focus has shifted from terrorism as a low-intensity conflict to a strategic threat to world powers with increased focus on Osama Bin Laden.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)42-56
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Human Computer Studies
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Terrorism
terrorism
Research Personnel
Research
Publications
content analysis
Bibliometrics
Bins
research focus
Social Support
visualization
Names
social network
Visualization
Databases
threat
science

Keywords

  • Bibliometrics
  • Co-citation analysis
  • Intellectual structure
  • Terrorism
  • Visualization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Mapping the contemporary terrorism research domain. / Reid, Edna F.; Chen, Hsinchun.

In: International Journal of Human Computer Studies, Vol. 65, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 42-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e036de1acd97488099f404381d8b3f86,
title = "Mapping the contemporary terrorism research domain",
abstract = "A systematic view of terrorism research to reveal the intellectual structure of the field and empirically discern the distinct set of core researchers, institutional affiliations, publications, and conceptual areas can help us gain a deeper understanding of approaches to terrorism. This paper responds to this need by using an integrated knowledge-mapping framework that we developed to identify the core researchers and knowledge creation approaches in terrorism. The framework uses three types of analysis: (a) basic analysis of scientific output using citation, bibliometric, and social network analyses, (b) content map analysis of large corpora of literature, and (c) co-citation analysis to analyse linkages among pairs of researchers. We applied domain visualization techniques such as content map analysis, block-modeling, and co-citation analysis to the literature and author citation data from the years 1965 to 2003. The data were gathered from ten databases such as the ISI Web of Science. The results reveal: (1) the names of the top 42 core terrorism researchers (e.g., Brian Jenkins, Bruce Hoffman, and Paul Wilkinson) as well as their institutional affiliations; (2) their influential publications; (3) clusters of terrorism researchers who work in similar areas; and (4) that the research focus has shifted from terrorism as a low-intensity conflict to a strategic threat to world powers with increased focus on Osama Bin Laden.",
keywords = "Bibliometrics, Co-citation analysis, Intellectual structure, Terrorism, Visualization",
author = "Reid, {Edna F.} and Hsinchun Chen",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.08.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "42--56",
journal = "International Journal of Human Computer Studies",
issn = "1071-5819",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping the contemporary terrorism research domain

AU - Reid, Edna F.

AU - Chen, Hsinchun

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - A systematic view of terrorism research to reveal the intellectual structure of the field and empirically discern the distinct set of core researchers, institutional affiliations, publications, and conceptual areas can help us gain a deeper understanding of approaches to terrorism. This paper responds to this need by using an integrated knowledge-mapping framework that we developed to identify the core researchers and knowledge creation approaches in terrorism. The framework uses three types of analysis: (a) basic analysis of scientific output using citation, bibliometric, and social network analyses, (b) content map analysis of large corpora of literature, and (c) co-citation analysis to analyse linkages among pairs of researchers. We applied domain visualization techniques such as content map analysis, block-modeling, and co-citation analysis to the literature and author citation data from the years 1965 to 2003. The data were gathered from ten databases such as the ISI Web of Science. The results reveal: (1) the names of the top 42 core terrorism researchers (e.g., Brian Jenkins, Bruce Hoffman, and Paul Wilkinson) as well as their institutional affiliations; (2) their influential publications; (3) clusters of terrorism researchers who work in similar areas; and (4) that the research focus has shifted from terrorism as a low-intensity conflict to a strategic threat to world powers with increased focus on Osama Bin Laden.

AB - A systematic view of terrorism research to reveal the intellectual structure of the field and empirically discern the distinct set of core researchers, institutional affiliations, publications, and conceptual areas can help us gain a deeper understanding of approaches to terrorism. This paper responds to this need by using an integrated knowledge-mapping framework that we developed to identify the core researchers and knowledge creation approaches in terrorism. The framework uses three types of analysis: (a) basic analysis of scientific output using citation, bibliometric, and social network analyses, (b) content map analysis of large corpora of literature, and (c) co-citation analysis to analyse linkages among pairs of researchers. We applied domain visualization techniques such as content map analysis, block-modeling, and co-citation analysis to the literature and author citation data from the years 1965 to 2003. The data were gathered from ten databases such as the ISI Web of Science. The results reveal: (1) the names of the top 42 core terrorism researchers (e.g., Brian Jenkins, Bruce Hoffman, and Paul Wilkinson) as well as their institutional affiliations; (2) their influential publications; (3) clusters of terrorism researchers who work in similar areas; and (4) that the research focus has shifted from terrorism as a low-intensity conflict to a strategic threat to world powers with increased focus on Osama Bin Laden.

KW - Bibliometrics

KW - Co-citation analysis

KW - Intellectual structure

KW - Terrorism

KW - Visualization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751181912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751181912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.08.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.08.006

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 42

EP - 56

JO - International Journal of Human Computer Studies

JF - International Journal of Human Computer Studies

SN - 1071-5819

IS - 1

ER -