Mathematics intervention for prevention of neurocognitive deficits in childhood leukemia

Ida M. Moore Ki, Marilyn J. Hockenberry, Cynthia O Anhalt, Kathy Mccarthy, Kevin R. Krull

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Despite evidence that CNS treatment is associated with cognitive and academic impairment, interventions to prevent or mitigate these problems are limited. The purpose was to determine if early intervention can prevent declines in mathematics abilities. Procedures: Fifty-seven children with ALL were enrolled and randomized to a Mathematics Intervention or Standard Care. Subjects completed neurocognitive assessments prior to the intervention, post-intervention, and 1 year later. Parents received written results and recommendations for use with their school. The Mathematics Intervention was based on Multiple Representation Theory and delivered individually over 1 year. Results: Thirty-two of 57 subjects completed the study and were included in data analyses. These 32 subjects completed all neurocognitive assessments and, for those in the Intervention Group, 40-50hours of the Mathematics Intervention. There were no group differences on relevant demographic variables; risk stratification; number of intrathecal methotrexate injections; or high dose systemic methotrexate. Significant improvements in calculation and applied mathematics from Baseline to Post-Intervention (P=0.003 and 0.002, respectively) and in visual working memory from Baseline to 1 year Follow-up (P=0.02) were observed in the Intervention but not the Standard Care Group. Results from repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated significant between group differences for applied mathematics [F(2,29)=12.47, P<0.001] and visual working memory [F(2,29)=5.53, P=0.009]. Conclusions: The Mathematics Intervention improved mathematics abilities and visual working memory compared to standard care. Future studies are needed to translate the Mathematics Intervention into a "virtual" delivery method more readily available to parents and children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)278-284
Number of pages7
JournalPediatric Blood and Cancer
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Mathematics
Leukemia
Short-Term Memory
Aptitude
Methotrexate
Parents
Spinal Injections
Analysis of Variance
Demography

Keywords

  • Childhood leukemia
  • Mathematics Intervention
  • Neurocognitive sequelae
  • Prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Hematology

Cite this

Mathematics intervention for prevention of neurocognitive deficits in childhood leukemia. / Moore Ki, Ida M.; Hockenberry, Marilyn J.; Anhalt, Cynthia O; Mccarthy, Kathy; Krull, Kevin R.

In: Pediatric Blood and Cancer, Vol. 59, No. 2, 08.2012, p. 278-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moore Ki, Ida M. ; Hockenberry, Marilyn J. ; Anhalt, Cynthia O ; Mccarthy, Kathy ; Krull, Kevin R. / Mathematics intervention for prevention of neurocognitive deficits in childhood leukemia. In: Pediatric Blood and Cancer. 2012 ; Vol. 59, No. 2. pp. 278-284.
@article{bcb1e7e462df41dbb3c86146f72030eb,
title = "Mathematics intervention for prevention of neurocognitive deficits in childhood leukemia",
abstract = "Background: Despite evidence that CNS treatment is associated with cognitive and academic impairment, interventions to prevent or mitigate these problems are limited. The purpose was to determine if early intervention can prevent declines in mathematics abilities. Procedures: Fifty-seven children with ALL were enrolled and randomized to a Mathematics Intervention or Standard Care. Subjects completed neurocognitive assessments prior to the intervention, post-intervention, and 1 year later. Parents received written results and recommendations for use with their school. The Mathematics Intervention was based on Multiple Representation Theory and delivered individually over 1 year. Results: Thirty-two of 57 subjects completed the study and were included in data analyses. These 32 subjects completed all neurocognitive assessments and, for those in the Intervention Group, 40-50hours of the Mathematics Intervention. There were no group differences on relevant demographic variables; risk stratification; number of intrathecal methotrexate injections; or high dose systemic methotrexate. Significant improvements in calculation and applied mathematics from Baseline to Post-Intervention (P=0.003 and 0.002, respectively) and in visual working memory from Baseline to 1 year Follow-up (P=0.02) were observed in the Intervention but not the Standard Care Group. Results from repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated significant between group differences for applied mathematics [F(2,29)=12.47, P<0.001] and visual working memory [F(2,29)=5.53, P=0.009]. Conclusions: The Mathematics Intervention improved mathematics abilities and visual working memory compared to standard care. Future studies are needed to translate the Mathematics Intervention into a {"}virtual{"} delivery method more readily available to parents and children.",
keywords = "Childhood leukemia, Mathematics Intervention, Neurocognitive sequelae, Prevention",
author = "{Moore Ki}, {Ida M.} and Hockenberry, {Marilyn J.} and Anhalt, {Cynthia O} and Kathy Mccarthy and Krull, {Kevin R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1002/pbc.23354",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "278--284",
journal = "Pediatric Blood and Cancer",
issn = "1545-5009",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mathematics intervention for prevention of neurocognitive deficits in childhood leukemia

AU - Moore Ki, Ida M.

AU - Hockenberry, Marilyn J.

AU - Anhalt, Cynthia O

AU - Mccarthy, Kathy

AU - Krull, Kevin R.

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Background: Despite evidence that CNS treatment is associated with cognitive and academic impairment, interventions to prevent or mitigate these problems are limited. The purpose was to determine if early intervention can prevent declines in mathematics abilities. Procedures: Fifty-seven children with ALL were enrolled and randomized to a Mathematics Intervention or Standard Care. Subjects completed neurocognitive assessments prior to the intervention, post-intervention, and 1 year later. Parents received written results and recommendations for use with their school. The Mathematics Intervention was based on Multiple Representation Theory and delivered individually over 1 year. Results: Thirty-two of 57 subjects completed the study and were included in data analyses. These 32 subjects completed all neurocognitive assessments and, for those in the Intervention Group, 40-50hours of the Mathematics Intervention. There were no group differences on relevant demographic variables; risk stratification; number of intrathecal methotrexate injections; or high dose systemic methotrexate. Significant improvements in calculation and applied mathematics from Baseline to Post-Intervention (P=0.003 and 0.002, respectively) and in visual working memory from Baseline to 1 year Follow-up (P=0.02) were observed in the Intervention but not the Standard Care Group. Results from repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated significant between group differences for applied mathematics [F(2,29)=12.47, P<0.001] and visual working memory [F(2,29)=5.53, P=0.009]. Conclusions: The Mathematics Intervention improved mathematics abilities and visual working memory compared to standard care. Future studies are needed to translate the Mathematics Intervention into a "virtual" delivery method more readily available to parents and children.

AB - Background: Despite evidence that CNS treatment is associated with cognitive and academic impairment, interventions to prevent or mitigate these problems are limited. The purpose was to determine if early intervention can prevent declines in mathematics abilities. Procedures: Fifty-seven children with ALL were enrolled and randomized to a Mathematics Intervention or Standard Care. Subjects completed neurocognitive assessments prior to the intervention, post-intervention, and 1 year later. Parents received written results and recommendations for use with their school. The Mathematics Intervention was based on Multiple Representation Theory and delivered individually over 1 year. Results: Thirty-two of 57 subjects completed the study and were included in data analyses. These 32 subjects completed all neurocognitive assessments and, for those in the Intervention Group, 40-50hours of the Mathematics Intervention. There were no group differences on relevant demographic variables; risk stratification; number of intrathecal methotrexate injections; or high dose systemic methotrexate. Significant improvements in calculation and applied mathematics from Baseline to Post-Intervention (P=0.003 and 0.002, respectively) and in visual working memory from Baseline to 1 year Follow-up (P=0.02) were observed in the Intervention but not the Standard Care Group. Results from repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated significant between group differences for applied mathematics [F(2,29)=12.47, P<0.001] and visual working memory [F(2,29)=5.53, P=0.009]. Conclusions: The Mathematics Intervention improved mathematics abilities and visual working memory compared to standard care. Future studies are needed to translate the Mathematics Intervention into a "virtual" delivery method more readily available to parents and children.

KW - Childhood leukemia

KW - Mathematics Intervention

KW - Neurocognitive sequelae

KW - Prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862248334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862248334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pbc.23354

DO - 10.1002/pbc.23354

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 278

EP - 284

JO - Pediatric Blood and Cancer

JF - Pediatric Blood and Cancer

SN - 1545-5009

IS - 2

ER -