"Me" and "We": How Expectant Cohabitors Talk about Economic Difficulty

Shannon A. Corkery, Melissa A Curran, Reyna A. Benavides

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

"Me" and "we" talk, as indicators of outcome considerations, is examined for expectant, unmarried cohabitors (N = 36). Grounded in social exchange and interdependence theories, "me" talk reflects individualism while "we" talk reflects collectivism (e.g., outcome consideration beyond self). Having interviewed cohabitors about effects of the difficult economy, we coded discussions for "me" and "we" talk revealing four groups: (1) Exclusively "We" (61.1%); (2) Primarily "We" (25%); (3) Equal "Me" and "We" (11.1%); and (4) Exclusively "Me" (<3%). Implications for therapeutic interventions that teach the importance and value of "we" talk in interdependent relationships are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)978-994
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment
Volume21
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

collectivism
individualism
interdependence
economy
economics
Values
Group

Keywords

  • "me"
  • "we"
  • cohabitors
  • difficult economy
  • expectant
  • Interdependence
  • social exchange
  • unmarried

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Anthropology

Cite this

"Me" and "We" : How Expectant Cohabitors Talk about Economic Difficulty. / Corkery, Shannon A.; Curran, Melissa A; Benavides, Reyna A.

In: Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, Vol. 21, No. 8, 11.2011, p. 978-994.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8350b8f37e924a8fa318d22f0cf9151f,
title = "{"}Me{"} and {"}We{"}: How Expectant Cohabitors Talk about Economic Difficulty",
abstract = "{"}Me{"} and {"}we{"} talk, as indicators of outcome considerations, is examined for expectant, unmarried cohabitors (N = 36). Grounded in social exchange and interdependence theories, {"}me{"} talk reflects individualism while {"}we{"} talk reflects collectivism (e.g., outcome consideration beyond self). Having interviewed cohabitors about effects of the difficult economy, we coded discussions for {"}me{"} and {"}we{"} talk revealing four groups: (1) Exclusively {"}We{"} (61.1{\%}); (2) Primarily {"}We{"} (25{\%}); (3) Equal {"}Me{"} and {"}We{"} (11.1{\%}); and (4) Exclusively {"}Me{"} (<3{\%}). Implications for therapeutic interventions that teach the importance and value of {"}we{"} talk in interdependent relationships are discussed.",
keywords = "{"}me{"}, {"}we{"}, cohabitors, difficult economy, expectant, Interdependence, social exchange, unmarried",
author = "Corkery, {Shannon A.} and Curran, {Melissa A} and Benavides, {Reyna A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/10911359.2011.588541",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "978--994",
journal = "Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment",
issn = "1091-1359",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Me" and "We"

T2 - How Expectant Cohabitors Talk about Economic Difficulty

AU - Corkery, Shannon A.

AU - Curran, Melissa A

AU - Benavides, Reyna A.

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - "Me" and "we" talk, as indicators of outcome considerations, is examined for expectant, unmarried cohabitors (N = 36). Grounded in social exchange and interdependence theories, "me" talk reflects individualism while "we" talk reflects collectivism (e.g., outcome consideration beyond self). Having interviewed cohabitors about effects of the difficult economy, we coded discussions for "me" and "we" talk revealing four groups: (1) Exclusively "We" (61.1%); (2) Primarily "We" (25%); (3) Equal "Me" and "We" (11.1%); and (4) Exclusively "Me" (<3%). Implications for therapeutic interventions that teach the importance and value of "we" talk in interdependent relationships are discussed.

AB - "Me" and "we" talk, as indicators of outcome considerations, is examined for expectant, unmarried cohabitors (N = 36). Grounded in social exchange and interdependence theories, "me" talk reflects individualism while "we" talk reflects collectivism (e.g., outcome consideration beyond self). Having interviewed cohabitors about effects of the difficult economy, we coded discussions for "me" and "we" talk revealing four groups: (1) Exclusively "We" (61.1%); (2) Primarily "We" (25%); (3) Equal "Me" and "We" (11.1%); and (4) Exclusively "Me" (<3%). Implications for therapeutic interventions that teach the importance and value of "we" talk in interdependent relationships are discussed.

KW - "me"

KW - "we"

KW - cohabitors

KW - difficult economy

KW - expectant

KW - Interdependence

KW - social exchange

KW - unmarried

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859037847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859037847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10911359.2011.588541

DO - 10.1080/10911359.2011.588541

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84859037847

VL - 21

SP - 978

EP - 994

JO - Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment

JF - Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment

SN - 1091-1359

IS - 8

ER -