Measurement equivalence: A non-technical primer on categorical multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in school psychology

Laura L. Pendergast, Nathaniel von der Embse, Stephen P. Kilgus, Katie R Eklund

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) have become a central component of school psychology research and practice, but EBIs are dependent upon the availability and use of evidence-based assessments (EBAs) with diverse student populations. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) is an analytical tool that can be used to examine the validity and measurement equivalence/invariance of scores across diverse groups. The objective of this article is to provide a conceptual and procedural overview of categorical MG-CFA, as well as an illustrated example based on data from the Social and Academic Behavior Risk Screener (SABRS) – a tool designed for use in school-based interventions. This article serves as a non-technical primer on the topic of MG-CFA with ordinal (rating scale) data and does so through the framework of examining equivalence of measures used for EBIs within multi-tiered models – an understudied topic. To go along with the illustrated example, we have provided supplementary files that include sample data, Mplus input code, and an annotated guide for understanding the input code (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002). Data needed to reproduce analyses in this article are available as supplemental materials (online only) in the Appendix of this article.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-82
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of School Psychology
Volume60
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

equivalence
Statistical Factor Analysis
factor analysis
psychology
Psychology
school
evidence
Group
Evidence-Based Practice
Risk-Taking
rating scale
risk behavior
Students
Research
Population
student

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Categorical
  • Diversity
  • Equivalence
  • Factor analysis
  • Invariance
  • Measurement
  • SABRS
  • School psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Measurement equivalence : A non-technical primer on categorical multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in school psychology. / Pendergast, Laura L.; von der Embse, Nathaniel; Kilgus, Stephen P.; Eklund, Katie R.

In: Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 60, 01.02.2017, p. 65-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4155ce30cbee4f6c9e33bf4964ede5cd,
title = "Measurement equivalence: A non-technical primer on categorical multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in school psychology",
abstract = "Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) have become a central component of school psychology research and practice, but EBIs are dependent upon the availability and use of evidence-based assessments (EBAs) with diverse student populations. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) is an analytical tool that can be used to examine the validity and measurement equivalence/invariance of scores across diverse groups. The objective of this article is to provide a conceptual and procedural overview of categorical MG-CFA, as well as an illustrated example based on data from the Social and Academic Behavior Risk Screener (SABRS) – a tool designed for use in school-based interventions. This article serves as a non-technical primer on the topic of MG-CFA with ordinal (rating scale) data and does so through the framework of examining equivalence of measures used for EBIs within multi-tiered models – an understudied topic. To go along with the illustrated example, we have provided supplementary files that include sample data, Mplus input code, and an annotated guide for understanding the input code (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002). Data needed to reproduce analyses in this article are available as supplemental materials (online only) in the Appendix of this article.",
keywords = "Bias, Categorical, Diversity, Equivalence, Factor analysis, Invariance, Measurement, SABRS, School psychology",
author = "Pendergast, {Laura L.} and {von der Embse}, Nathaniel and Kilgus, {Stephen P.} and Eklund, {Katie R}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "65--82",
journal = "Journal of School Psychology",
issn = "0022-4405",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement equivalence

T2 - A non-technical primer on categorical multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in school psychology

AU - Pendergast, Laura L.

AU - von der Embse, Nathaniel

AU - Kilgus, Stephen P.

AU - Eklund, Katie R

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) have become a central component of school psychology research and practice, but EBIs are dependent upon the availability and use of evidence-based assessments (EBAs) with diverse student populations. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) is an analytical tool that can be used to examine the validity and measurement equivalence/invariance of scores across diverse groups. The objective of this article is to provide a conceptual and procedural overview of categorical MG-CFA, as well as an illustrated example based on data from the Social and Academic Behavior Risk Screener (SABRS) – a tool designed for use in school-based interventions. This article serves as a non-technical primer on the topic of MG-CFA with ordinal (rating scale) data and does so through the framework of examining equivalence of measures used for EBIs within multi-tiered models – an understudied topic. To go along with the illustrated example, we have provided supplementary files that include sample data, Mplus input code, and an annotated guide for understanding the input code (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002). Data needed to reproduce analyses in this article are available as supplemental materials (online only) in the Appendix of this article.

AB - Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) have become a central component of school psychology research and practice, but EBIs are dependent upon the availability and use of evidence-based assessments (EBAs) with diverse student populations. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) is an analytical tool that can be used to examine the validity and measurement equivalence/invariance of scores across diverse groups. The objective of this article is to provide a conceptual and procedural overview of categorical MG-CFA, as well as an illustrated example based on data from the Social and Academic Behavior Risk Screener (SABRS) – a tool designed for use in school-based interventions. This article serves as a non-technical primer on the topic of MG-CFA with ordinal (rating scale) data and does so through the framework of examining equivalence of measures used for EBIs within multi-tiered models – an understudied topic. To go along with the illustrated example, we have provided supplementary files that include sample data, Mplus input code, and an annotated guide for understanding the input code (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002). Data needed to reproduce analyses in this article are available as supplemental materials (online only) in the Appendix of this article.

KW - Bias

KW - Categorical

KW - Diversity

KW - Equivalence

KW - Factor analysis

KW - Invariance

KW - Measurement

KW - SABRS

KW - School psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008343533&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008343533&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 28164800

AN - SCOPUS:85008343533

VL - 60

SP - 65

EP - 82

JO - Journal of School Psychology

JF - Journal of School Psychology

SN - 0022-4405

ER -