Measurement of fatigue

Comparison of the reliability and validity of single-item and short measures to a comprehensive measure

Hee Ju Kim, Ivo L Abraham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Evidence is needed on the clinicometric properties of single-item or short measures as alternatives to comprehensive measures. Objectives We examined whether two single-item fatigue measures (i.e., Likert scale, numeric rating scale) or a short fatigue measure were comparable to a comprehensive measure in reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test–retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, concurrent, and predictive validity) in Korean young adults. Methods For this quantitative study, we selected the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue for the comprehensive measure and the Profile of Mood States–Brief, Fatigue subscale for the short measure; and constructed two single-item measures. A total of 368 students from four nursing colleges in South Korea participated. We used Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation for internal consistency reliability and intraclass correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability. We assessed Pearson's correlation with a comprehensive measure for convergent validity, with perceived stress level and sleep quality for concurrent validity and the receiver operating characteristic curve for predictive validity. Results The short measure was comparable to the comprehensive measure in internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81 vs. 0.88); test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.66 vs. 0.61); convergent validity (r with comprehensive measure = 0.79); concurrent validity (r with perceived stress = 0.55, r with sleep quality = 0.39) and predictive validity (area under curve = 0.88). Single-item measures were not comparable to the comprehensive measure. Conclusions A short fatigue measure exhibited similar levels of reliability and validity to the comprehensive measure in Korean young adults.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-43
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume65
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Fatigue
Young Adult
Sleep
Republic of Korea
Nursing Students
ROC Curve
Area Under Curve
Chronic Disease

Keywords

  • Fatigue
  • Metric systems
  • Psychometrics
  • Validation studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

@article{ed4d0a654395412496965cae83d98c79,
title = "Measurement of fatigue: Comparison of the reliability and validity of single-item and short measures to a comprehensive measure",
abstract = "Background Evidence is needed on the clinicometric properties of single-item or short measures as alternatives to comprehensive measures. Objectives We examined whether two single-item fatigue measures (i.e., Likert scale, numeric rating scale) or a short fatigue measure were comparable to a comprehensive measure in reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test–retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, concurrent, and predictive validity) in Korean young adults. Methods For this quantitative study, we selected the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue for the comprehensive measure and the Profile of Mood States–Brief, Fatigue subscale for the short measure; and constructed two single-item measures. A total of 368 students from four nursing colleges in South Korea participated. We used Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation for internal consistency reliability and intraclass correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability. We assessed Pearson's correlation with a comprehensive measure for convergent validity, with perceived stress level and sleep quality for concurrent validity and the receiver operating characteristic curve for predictive validity. Results The short measure was comparable to the comprehensive measure in internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81 vs. 0.88); test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.66 vs. 0.61); convergent validity (r with comprehensive measure = 0.79); concurrent validity (r with perceived stress = 0.55, r with sleep quality = 0.39) and predictive validity (area under curve = 0.88). Single-item measures were not comparable to the comprehensive measure. Conclusions A short fatigue measure exhibited similar levels of reliability and validity to the comprehensive measure in Korean young adults.",
keywords = "Fatigue, Metric systems, Psychometrics, Validation studies",
author = "Kim, {Hee Ju} and Abraham, {Ivo L}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.10.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "35--43",
journal = "International Journal of Nursing Studies",
issn = "0020-7489",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of fatigue

T2 - Comparison of the reliability and validity of single-item and short measures to a comprehensive measure

AU - Kim, Hee Ju

AU - Abraham, Ivo L

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background Evidence is needed on the clinicometric properties of single-item or short measures as alternatives to comprehensive measures. Objectives We examined whether two single-item fatigue measures (i.e., Likert scale, numeric rating scale) or a short fatigue measure were comparable to a comprehensive measure in reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test–retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, concurrent, and predictive validity) in Korean young adults. Methods For this quantitative study, we selected the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue for the comprehensive measure and the Profile of Mood States–Brief, Fatigue subscale for the short measure; and constructed two single-item measures. A total of 368 students from four nursing colleges in South Korea participated. We used Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation for internal consistency reliability and intraclass correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability. We assessed Pearson's correlation with a comprehensive measure for convergent validity, with perceived stress level and sleep quality for concurrent validity and the receiver operating characteristic curve for predictive validity. Results The short measure was comparable to the comprehensive measure in internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81 vs. 0.88); test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.66 vs. 0.61); convergent validity (r with comprehensive measure = 0.79); concurrent validity (r with perceived stress = 0.55, r with sleep quality = 0.39) and predictive validity (area under curve = 0.88). Single-item measures were not comparable to the comprehensive measure. Conclusions A short fatigue measure exhibited similar levels of reliability and validity to the comprehensive measure in Korean young adults.

AB - Background Evidence is needed on the clinicometric properties of single-item or short measures as alternatives to comprehensive measures. Objectives We examined whether two single-item fatigue measures (i.e., Likert scale, numeric rating scale) or a short fatigue measure were comparable to a comprehensive measure in reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test–retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, concurrent, and predictive validity) in Korean young adults. Methods For this quantitative study, we selected the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue for the comprehensive measure and the Profile of Mood States–Brief, Fatigue subscale for the short measure; and constructed two single-item measures. A total of 368 students from four nursing colleges in South Korea participated. We used Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation for internal consistency reliability and intraclass correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability. We assessed Pearson's correlation with a comprehensive measure for convergent validity, with perceived stress level and sleep quality for concurrent validity and the receiver operating characteristic curve for predictive validity. Results The short measure was comparable to the comprehensive measure in internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81 vs. 0.88); test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.66 vs. 0.61); convergent validity (r with comprehensive measure = 0.79); concurrent validity (r with perceived stress = 0.55, r with sleep quality = 0.39) and predictive validity (area under curve = 0.88). Single-item measures were not comparable to the comprehensive measure. Conclusions A short fatigue measure exhibited similar levels of reliability and validity to the comprehensive measure in Korean young adults.

KW - Fatigue

KW - Metric systems

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Validation studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994034454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994034454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.10.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.10.012

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 35

EP - 43

JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies

JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies

SN - 0020-7489

ER -