Abstract
Background Evidence is needed on the clinicometric properties of single-item or short measures as alternatives to comprehensive measures. Objectives We examined whether two single-item fatigue measures (i.e., Likert scale, numeric rating scale) or a short fatigue measure were comparable to a comprehensive measure in reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test–retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, concurrent, and predictive validity) in Korean young adults. Methods For this quantitative study, we selected the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue for the comprehensive measure and the Profile of Mood States–Brief, Fatigue subscale for the short measure; and constructed two single-item measures. A total of 368 students from four nursing colleges in South Korea participated. We used Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation for internal consistency reliability and intraclass correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability. We assessed Pearson's correlation with a comprehensive measure for convergent validity, with perceived stress level and sleep quality for concurrent validity and the receiver operating characteristic curve for predictive validity. Results The short measure was comparable to the comprehensive measure in internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81 vs. 0.88); test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.66 vs. 0.61); convergent validity (r with comprehensive measure = 0.79); concurrent validity (r with perceived stress = 0.55, r with sleep quality = 0.39) and predictive validity (area under curve = 0.88). Single-item measures were not comparable to the comprehensive measure. Conclusions A short fatigue measure exhibited similar levels of reliability and validity to the comprehensive measure in Korean young adults.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 35-43 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | International Journal of Nursing Studies |
| Volume | 65 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2017 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Fatigue
- Metric systems
- Psychometrics
- Validation studies
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Nursing(all)
Cite this
Measurement of fatigue : Comparison of the reliability and validity of single-item and short measures to a comprehensive measure. / Kim, Hee Ju; Abraham, Ivo L.
In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 65, 01.01.2017, p. 35-43.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Measurement of fatigue
T2 - Comparison of the reliability and validity of single-item and short measures to a comprehensive measure
AU - Kim, Hee Ju
AU - Abraham, Ivo L
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Background Evidence is needed on the clinicometric properties of single-item or short measures as alternatives to comprehensive measures. Objectives We examined whether two single-item fatigue measures (i.e., Likert scale, numeric rating scale) or a short fatigue measure were comparable to a comprehensive measure in reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test–retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, concurrent, and predictive validity) in Korean young adults. Methods For this quantitative study, we selected the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue for the comprehensive measure and the Profile of Mood States–Brief, Fatigue subscale for the short measure; and constructed two single-item measures. A total of 368 students from four nursing colleges in South Korea participated. We used Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation for internal consistency reliability and intraclass correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability. We assessed Pearson's correlation with a comprehensive measure for convergent validity, with perceived stress level and sleep quality for concurrent validity and the receiver operating characteristic curve for predictive validity. Results The short measure was comparable to the comprehensive measure in internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81 vs. 0.88); test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.66 vs. 0.61); convergent validity (r with comprehensive measure = 0.79); concurrent validity (r with perceived stress = 0.55, r with sleep quality = 0.39) and predictive validity (area under curve = 0.88). Single-item measures were not comparable to the comprehensive measure. Conclusions A short fatigue measure exhibited similar levels of reliability and validity to the comprehensive measure in Korean young adults.
AB - Background Evidence is needed on the clinicometric properties of single-item or short measures as alternatives to comprehensive measures. Objectives We examined whether two single-item fatigue measures (i.e., Likert scale, numeric rating scale) or a short fatigue measure were comparable to a comprehensive measure in reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test–retest reliability) and validity (i.e., convergent, concurrent, and predictive validity) in Korean young adults. Methods For this quantitative study, we selected the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue for the comprehensive measure and the Profile of Mood States–Brief, Fatigue subscale for the short measure; and constructed two single-item measures. A total of 368 students from four nursing colleges in South Korea participated. We used Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation for internal consistency reliability and intraclass correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability. We assessed Pearson's correlation with a comprehensive measure for convergent validity, with perceived stress level and sleep quality for concurrent validity and the receiver operating characteristic curve for predictive validity. Results The short measure was comparable to the comprehensive measure in internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81 vs. 0.88); test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.66 vs. 0.61); convergent validity (r with comprehensive measure = 0.79); concurrent validity (r with perceived stress = 0.55, r with sleep quality = 0.39) and predictive validity (area under curve = 0.88). Single-item measures were not comparable to the comprehensive measure. Conclusions A short fatigue measure exhibited similar levels of reliability and validity to the comprehensive measure in Korean young adults.
KW - Fatigue
KW - Metric systems
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Validation studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994034454&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994034454&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.10.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.10.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 27821285
AN - SCOPUS:84994034454
VL - 65
SP - 35
EP - 43
JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies
JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies
SN - 0020-7489
ER -