Measurement variability in DNA flow cytometry of replicate samples

L. L. Wheeless, J. S. Coon, C. Cox, A. D. Deitch, R. W. DeVere White, L. G. Koss, M. R. Melamed, M. J. O'Connell, J. E. Reeder, Ronald S Weinstein, R. P. Wersto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A Bladder Cancer Flow Cytometry Network study has been carried out aimed at identification of the sources of inter- and intralaboratory variability. Replicate 'cocktail' samples containing a mixture of peripheral blood lymphocytes and an aneuploid cell line and samples of peripheral blood lymphocytes serving as a DNA reference standard were distributed to five network laboratories. The samples were stained for DNA using propidium iodide, with each laboratory using its own staining protocol. Sets of these samples were analyzed by flow cytometry to obtain cellular DNA distributions. DNA index and hyperdiploid fraction were calculated for each histogram using an automated technique. Results were evaluated by analysis of variance to identify sources of variability. Three important sources of variation were found that affect flow cytometry in general and the transportability of flow cytometry results to routine clinical use in particular. The significant variation among laboratories that is constant across time most probably represents stable differences in instrumentation, instrument set-up, and laboratory techniques. This variation can be compensated for, if it is known and stable, to develop transportable classification criteria. The second type of variation, termed the interaction component, represents differences among laboratories that are not constant across time. Sources of this variation include inconsistency in sample preparation, staining, and analysis. The elimination of this type of variation is required for meaningful comparison of data within and among laboratories and the creation of interlaboratory databases. The third type of variation represents pure measurement variability and affects the sensitivity of the technique.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)731-738
Number of pages8
JournalCytometry
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Flow Cytometry
DNA
Lymphocytes
Staining and Labeling
Polyploidy
Propidium
Aneuploidy
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Analysis of Variance
Databases
Cell Line

Keywords

  • Laboratory variability
  • Measurement variability
  • Quality control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Cell Biology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Biophysics
  • Endocrinology

Cite this

Wheeless, L. L., Coon, J. S., Cox, C., Deitch, A. D., DeVere White, R. W., Koss, L. G., ... Wersto, R. P. (1989). Measurement variability in DNA flow cytometry of replicate samples. Cytometry, 10(6), 731-738. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990100610

Measurement variability in DNA flow cytometry of replicate samples. / Wheeless, L. L.; Coon, J. S.; Cox, C.; Deitch, A. D.; DeVere White, R. W.; Koss, L. G.; Melamed, M. R.; O'Connell, M. J.; Reeder, J. E.; Weinstein, Ronald S; Wersto, R. P.

In: Cytometry, Vol. 10, No. 6, 1989, p. 731-738.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wheeless, LL, Coon, JS, Cox, C, Deitch, AD, DeVere White, RW, Koss, LG, Melamed, MR, O'Connell, MJ, Reeder, JE, Weinstein, RS & Wersto, RP 1989, 'Measurement variability in DNA flow cytometry of replicate samples', Cytometry, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 731-738. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990100610
Wheeless LL, Coon JS, Cox C, Deitch AD, DeVere White RW, Koss LG et al. Measurement variability in DNA flow cytometry of replicate samples. Cytometry. 1989;10(6):731-738. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990100610
Wheeless, L. L. ; Coon, J. S. ; Cox, C. ; Deitch, A. D. ; DeVere White, R. W. ; Koss, L. G. ; Melamed, M. R. ; O'Connell, M. J. ; Reeder, J. E. ; Weinstein, Ronald S ; Wersto, R. P. / Measurement variability in DNA flow cytometry of replicate samples. In: Cytometry. 1989 ; Vol. 10, No. 6. pp. 731-738.
@article{30c6da23cac440e8919299b99801addf,
title = "Measurement variability in DNA flow cytometry of replicate samples",
abstract = "A Bladder Cancer Flow Cytometry Network study has been carried out aimed at identification of the sources of inter- and intralaboratory variability. Replicate 'cocktail' samples containing a mixture of peripheral blood lymphocytes and an aneuploid cell line and samples of peripheral blood lymphocytes serving as a DNA reference standard were distributed to five network laboratories. The samples were stained for DNA using propidium iodide, with each laboratory using its own staining protocol. Sets of these samples were analyzed by flow cytometry to obtain cellular DNA distributions. DNA index and hyperdiploid fraction were calculated for each histogram using an automated technique. Results were evaluated by analysis of variance to identify sources of variability. Three important sources of variation were found that affect flow cytometry in general and the transportability of flow cytometry results to routine clinical use in particular. The significant variation among laboratories that is constant across time most probably represents stable differences in instrumentation, instrument set-up, and laboratory techniques. This variation can be compensated for, if it is known and stable, to develop transportable classification criteria. The second type of variation, termed the interaction component, represents differences among laboratories that are not constant across time. Sources of this variation include inconsistency in sample preparation, staining, and analysis. The elimination of this type of variation is required for meaningful comparison of data within and among laboratories and the creation of interlaboratory databases. The third type of variation represents pure measurement variability and affects the sensitivity of the technique.",
keywords = "Laboratory variability, Measurement variability, Quality control",
author = "Wheeless, {L. L.} and Coon, {J. S.} and C. Cox and Deitch, {A. D.} and {DeVere White}, {R. W.} and Koss, {L. G.} and Melamed, {M. R.} and O'Connell, {M. J.} and Reeder, {J. E.} and Weinstein, {Ronald S} and Wersto, {R. P.}",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1002/cyto.990100610",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "731--738",
journal = "Cytometry",
issn = "0196-4763",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement variability in DNA flow cytometry of replicate samples

AU - Wheeless, L. L.

AU - Coon, J. S.

AU - Cox, C.

AU - Deitch, A. D.

AU - DeVere White, R. W.

AU - Koss, L. G.

AU - Melamed, M. R.

AU - O'Connell, M. J.

AU - Reeder, J. E.

AU - Weinstein, Ronald S

AU - Wersto, R. P.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - A Bladder Cancer Flow Cytometry Network study has been carried out aimed at identification of the sources of inter- and intralaboratory variability. Replicate 'cocktail' samples containing a mixture of peripheral blood lymphocytes and an aneuploid cell line and samples of peripheral blood lymphocytes serving as a DNA reference standard were distributed to five network laboratories. The samples were stained for DNA using propidium iodide, with each laboratory using its own staining protocol. Sets of these samples were analyzed by flow cytometry to obtain cellular DNA distributions. DNA index and hyperdiploid fraction were calculated for each histogram using an automated technique. Results were evaluated by analysis of variance to identify sources of variability. Three important sources of variation were found that affect flow cytometry in general and the transportability of flow cytometry results to routine clinical use in particular. The significant variation among laboratories that is constant across time most probably represents stable differences in instrumentation, instrument set-up, and laboratory techniques. This variation can be compensated for, if it is known and stable, to develop transportable classification criteria. The second type of variation, termed the interaction component, represents differences among laboratories that are not constant across time. Sources of this variation include inconsistency in sample preparation, staining, and analysis. The elimination of this type of variation is required for meaningful comparison of data within and among laboratories and the creation of interlaboratory databases. The third type of variation represents pure measurement variability and affects the sensitivity of the technique.

AB - A Bladder Cancer Flow Cytometry Network study has been carried out aimed at identification of the sources of inter- and intralaboratory variability. Replicate 'cocktail' samples containing a mixture of peripheral blood lymphocytes and an aneuploid cell line and samples of peripheral blood lymphocytes serving as a DNA reference standard were distributed to five network laboratories. The samples were stained for DNA using propidium iodide, with each laboratory using its own staining protocol. Sets of these samples were analyzed by flow cytometry to obtain cellular DNA distributions. DNA index and hyperdiploid fraction were calculated for each histogram using an automated technique. Results were evaluated by analysis of variance to identify sources of variability. Three important sources of variation were found that affect flow cytometry in general and the transportability of flow cytometry results to routine clinical use in particular. The significant variation among laboratories that is constant across time most probably represents stable differences in instrumentation, instrument set-up, and laboratory techniques. This variation can be compensated for, if it is known and stable, to develop transportable classification criteria. The second type of variation, termed the interaction component, represents differences among laboratories that are not constant across time. Sources of this variation include inconsistency in sample preparation, staining, and analysis. The elimination of this type of variation is required for meaningful comparison of data within and among laboratories and the creation of interlaboratory databases. The third type of variation represents pure measurement variability and affects the sensitivity of the technique.

KW - Laboratory variability

KW - Measurement variability

KW - Quality control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024351283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024351283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cyto.990100610

DO - 10.1002/cyto.990100610

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 731

EP - 738

JO - Cytometry

JF - Cytometry

SN - 0196-4763

IS - 6

ER -