Measuring and Evaluating Convergence Processes Across a Series of Group Discussions

Sarah M. Staggs, Joseph A Bonito, Jennifer N. Ervin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As groups develop, members’ knowledge and expectations regarding the task and the group tend to converge. Such convergence allows members to anticipate and coordinate their own and others’ actions, facilitating productive group work. Using zero-history laboratory groups, this study analyzes the presence and trajectory of cognitive convergence as groups worked on a series of three similar tasks. We focus on two types of convergence: anticipatory expectations for future work, and reflective assessments regarding previous group discussions. Results indicate immediate convergence for reflective cognitions but delayed convergence for anticipatory cognitions. Associations among the different types of convergence also vary at the group- and individual-levels of analysis. The discussion addresses measurement implications of both types of convergence in regard to emergence of group-like cognitive structures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalGroup Decision and Negotiation
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 22 2018

Fingerprint

group discussion
Trajectories
cognition
Group
cognitive structure
group work
study group
Group discussion
Group Discussion
group membership
history

Keywords

  • Cognitive convergence
  • Latent group models
  • Longitudinal design
  • Structuration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Measuring and Evaluating Convergence Processes Across a Series of Group Discussions. / Staggs, Sarah M.; Bonito, Joseph A; Ervin, Jennifer N.

In: Group Decision and Negotiation, 22.02.2018, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c89db3777c7e4430bdea5b3ea727147e,
title = "Measuring and Evaluating Convergence Processes Across a Series of Group Discussions",
abstract = "As groups develop, members’ knowledge and expectations regarding the task and the group tend to converge. Such convergence allows members to anticipate and coordinate their own and others’ actions, facilitating productive group work. Using zero-history laboratory groups, this study analyzes the presence and trajectory of cognitive convergence as groups worked on a series of three similar tasks. We focus on two types of convergence: anticipatory expectations for future work, and reflective assessments regarding previous group discussions. Results indicate immediate convergence for reflective cognitions but delayed convergence for anticipatory cognitions. Associations among the different types of convergence also vary at the group- and individual-levels of analysis. The discussion addresses measurement implications of both types of convergence in regard to emergence of group-like cognitive structures.",
keywords = "Cognitive convergence, Latent group models, Longitudinal design, Structuration",
author = "Staggs, {Sarah M.} and Bonito, {Joseph A} and Ervin, {Jennifer N.}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1007/s10726-018-9560-3",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Group Decision and Negotiation",
issn = "0926-2644",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring and Evaluating Convergence Processes Across a Series of Group Discussions

AU - Staggs, Sarah M.

AU - Bonito, Joseph A

AU - Ervin, Jennifer N.

PY - 2018/2/22

Y1 - 2018/2/22

N2 - As groups develop, members’ knowledge and expectations regarding the task and the group tend to converge. Such convergence allows members to anticipate and coordinate their own and others’ actions, facilitating productive group work. Using zero-history laboratory groups, this study analyzes the presence and trajectory of cognitive convergence as groups worked on a series of three similar tasks. We focus on two types of convergence: anticipatory expectations for future work, and reflective assessments regarding previous group discussions. Results indicate immediate convergence for reflective cognitions but delayed convergence for anticipatory cognitions. Associations among the different types of convergence also vary at the group- and individual-levels of analysis. The discussion addresses measurement implications of both types of convergence in regard to emergence of group-like cognitive structures.

AB - As groups develop, members’ knowledge and expectations regarding the task and the group tend to converge. Such convergence allows members to anticipate and coordinate their own and others’ actions, facilitating productive group work. Using zero-history laboratory groups, this study analyzes the presence and trajectory of cognitive convergence as groups worked on a series of three similar tasks. We focus on two types of convergence: anticipatory expectations for future work, and reflective assessments regarding previous group discussions. Results indicate immediate convergence for reflective cognitions but delayed convergence for anticipatory cognitions. Associations among the different types of convergence also vary at the group- and individual-levels of analysis. The discussion addresses measurement implications of both types of convergence in regard to emergence of group-like cognitive structures.

KW - Cognitive convergence

KW - Latent group models

KW - Longitudinal design

KW - Structuration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042358104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042358104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10726-018-9560-3

DO - 10.1007/s10726-018-9560-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042358104

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Group Decision and Negotiation

JF - Group Decision and Negotiation

SN - 0926-2644

ER -