Measuring and improving quality in emergency medicine

Louis Graff, Carl Stevens, Daniel W Spaite, JoAnne Foody

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The findings are presented of a consensus committee created to address the measuring and improving of quality in emergency medicine. The objective of the committee was to critically evaluate how quality in emergency medicine can be measured and how quality improvement projects can positively affect the care of emergency patients. Medical quality is defined as "the care health professionals would want to receive if they got sick." The literature of quality improvement in emergency medicine is reviewed and analyzed. A summary list of measures of quality is included with four categories: condition-specific diseases, diagnostic syndromes, tasks/procedures, and department efficiency/efficacy. Methods and tools for quantifying these measures are examined as well as their accuracy in assessing quality and adjusting for differences in environment, and patient populations. Successful strategies for changing physician behavior are detailed as well as barriers to change. Examples are given of successful quality improvement efforts. Also examined is how to address the emergency care needs of vulnerable populations such as older persons, women, those without health insurance, and ethnic minorities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1091-1107
Number of pages17
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume9
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Emergency Medicine
Quality Improvement
Emergency Medical Services
Vulnerable Populations
Health Insurance
Patient Care
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Population

Keywords

  • Emergency medicine
  • Quality improvement
  • Vulnerable populations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Measuring and improving quality in emergency medicine. / Graff, Louis; Stevens, Carl; Spaite, Daniel W; Foody, JoAnne.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 11, 01.11.2002, p. 1091-1107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Graff, Louis ; Stevens, Carl ; Spaite, Daniel W ; Foody, JoAnne. / Measuring and improving quality in emergency medicine. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2002 ; Vol. 9, No. 11. pp. 1091-1107.
@article{7576b91292f74a698fcc1178c3274a93,
title = "Measuring and improving quality in emergency medicine",
abstract = "The findings are presented of a consensus committee created to address the measuring and improving of quality in emergency medicine. The objective of the committee was to critically evaluate how quality in emergency medicine can be measured and how quality improvement projects can positively affect the care of emergency patients. Medical quality is defined as {"}the care health professionals would want to receive if they got sick.{"} The literature of quality improvement in emergency medicine is reviewed and analyzed. A summary list of measures of quality is included with four categories: condition-specific diseases, diagnostic syndromes, tasks/procedures, and department efficiency/efficacy. Methods and tools for quantifying these measures are examined as well as their accuracy in assessing quality and adjusting for differences in environment, and patient populations. Successful strategies for changing physician behavior are detailed as well as barriers to change. Examples are given of successful quality improvement efforts. Also examined is how to address the emergency care needs of vulnerable populations such as older persons, women, those without health insurance, and ethnic minorities.",
keywords = "Emergency medicine, Quality improvement, Vulnerable populations",
author = "Louis Graff and Carl Stevens and Spaite, {Daniel W} and JoAnne Foody",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1197/aemj.9.11.1091",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1091--1107",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring and improving quality in emergency medicine

AU - Graff, Louis

AU - Stevens, Carl

AU - Spaite, Daniel W

AU - Foody, JoAnne

PY - 2002/11/1

Y1 - 2002/11/1

N2 - The findings are presented of a consensus committee created to address the measuring and improving of quality in emergency medicine. The objective of the committee was to critically evaluate how quality in emergency medicine can be measured and how quality improvement projects can positively affect the care of emergency patients. Medical quality is defined as "the care health professionals would want to receive if they got sick." The literature of quality improvement in emergency medicine is reviewed and analyzed. A summary list of measures of quality is included with four categories: condition-specific diseases, diagnostic syndromes, tasks/procedures, and department efficiency/efficacy. Methods and tools for quantifying these measures are examined as well as their accuracy in assessing quality and adjusting for differences in environment, and patient populations. Successful strategies for changing physician behavior are detailed as well as barriers to change. Examples are given of successful quality improvement efforts. Also examined is how to address the emergency care needs of vulnerable populations such as older persons, women, those without health insurance, and ethnic minorities.

AB - The findings are presented of a consensus committee created to address the measuring and improving of quality in emergency medicine. The objective of the committee was to critically evaluate how quality in emergency medicine can be measured and how quality improvement projects can positively affect the care of emergency patients. Medical quality is defined as "the care health professionals would want to receive if they got sick." The literature of quality improvement in emergency medicine is reviewed and analyzed. A summary list of measures of quality is included with four categories: condition-specific diseases, diagnostic syndromes, tasks/procedures, and department efficiency/efficacy. Methods and tools for quantifying these measures are examined as well as their accuracy in assessing quality and adjusting for differences in environment, and patient populations. Successful strategies for changing physician behavior are detailed as well as barriers to change. Examples are given of successful quality improvement efforts. Also examined is how to address the emergency care needs of vulnerable populations such as older persons, women, those without health insurance, and ethnic minorities.

KW - Emergency medicine

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Vulnerable populations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036843308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036843308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/aemj.9.11.1091

DO - 10.1197/aemj.9.11.1091

M3 - Article

C2 - 12414457

AN - SCOPUS:0036843308

VL - 9

SP - 1091

EP - 1107

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 11

ER -