Measuring group efficacy in virtual teams: New questions in an old debate

Andrew M. Hardin, Mark A. Fuller, Joseph S Valacich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Group efficacy has received renewed attention in the group literature. Although the relationship between group efficacy and group performance is well established, debate continues on how best to measure the construct. Although most research has explored this issue using collocated groups, this article examines the measurement of group efficacy in virtual teams and explores why some measurement methods may be more appropriate for use in noncollocated groups. Fifty-three senior-level university students involved in virtual team projects were administered questionnaires over the course of their project. As theorized, data analyses revealed that group efficacy beliefs reached by consensus were significantly higher than those measured by surveys administered to individual virtual team members. In addition, support for the greater predictability of an aggregated method over a group consensus method was demonstrated. Follow-up analyses show that group outcome perceptions were significantly related to team performance. Implications and future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-85
Number of pages21
JournalSmall Group Research
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Students
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Group efficacy
  • Performance
  • Virtual team efficacy
  • Virtual teams

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Measuring group efficacy in virtual teams : New questions in an old debate. / Hardin, Andrew M.; Fuller, Mark A.; Valacich, Joseph S.

In: Small Group Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, 02.2006, p. 65-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hardin, Andrew M. ; Fuller, Mark A. ; Valacich, Joseph S. / Measuring group efficacy in virtual teams : New questions in an old debate. In: Small Group Research. 2006 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 65-85.
@article{9dc01d8990f441bba3582ba170d77ef9,
title = "Measuring group efficacy in virtual teams: New questions in an old debate",
abstract = "Group efficacy has received renewed attention in the group literature. Although the relationship between group efficacy and group performance is well established, debate continues on how best to measure the construct. Although most research has explored this issue using collocated groups, this article examines the measurement of group efficacy in virtual teams and explores why some measurement methods may be more appropriate for use in noncollocated groups. Fifty-three senior-level university students involved in virtual team projects were administered questionnaires over the course of their project. As theorized, data analyses revealed that group efficacy beliefs reached by consensus were significantly higher than those measured by surveys administered to individual virtual team members. In addition, support for the greater predictability of an aggregated method over a group consensus method was demonstrated. Follow-up analyses show that group outcome perceptions were significantly related to team performance. Implications and future research are discussed.",
keywords = "Group efficacy, Performance, Virtual team efficacy, Virtual teams",
author = "Hardin, {Andrew M.} and Fuller, {Mark A.} and Valacich, {Joseph S}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/1046496405284219",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "65--85",
journal = "Small Group Research",
issn = "1046-4964",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring group efficacy in virtual teams

T2 - New questions in an old debate

AU - Hardin, Andrew M.

AU - Fuller, Mark A.

AU - Valacich, Joseph S

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - Group efficacy has received renewed attention in the group literature. Although the relationship between group efficacy and group performance is well established, debate continues on how best to measure the construct. Although most research has explored this issue using collocated groups, this article examines the measurement of group efficacy in virtual teams and explores why some measurement methods may be more appropriate for use in noncollocated groups. Fifty-three senior-level university students involved in virtual team projects were administered questionnaires over the course of their project. As theorized, data analyses revealed that group efficacy beliefs reached by consensus were significantly higher than those measured by surveys administered to individual virtual team members. In addition, support for the greater predictability of an aggregated method over a group consensus method was demonstrated. Follow-up analyses show that group outcome perceptions were significantly related to team performance. Implications and future research are discussed.

AB - Group efficacy has received renewed attention in the group literature. Although the relationship between group efficacy and group performance is well established, debate continues on how best to measure the construct. Although most research has explored this issue using collocated groups, this article examines the measurement of group efficacy in virtual teams and explores why some measurement methods may be more appropriate for use in noncollocated groups. Fifty-three senior-level university students involved in virtual team projects were administered questionnaires over the course of their project. As theorized, data analyses revealed that group efficacy beliefs reached by consensus were significantly higher than those measured by surveys administered to individual virtual team members. In addition, support for the greater predictability of an aggregated method over a group consensus method was demonstrated. Follow-up analyses show that group outcome perceptions were significantly related to team performance. Implications and future research are discussed.

KW - Group efficacy

KW - Performance

KW - Virtual team efficacy

KW - Virtual teams

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644967824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644967824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1046496405284219

DO - 10.1177/1046496405284219

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33644967824

VL - 37

SP - 65

EP - 85

JO - Small Group Research

JF - Small Group Research

SN - 1046-4964

IS - 1

ER -