Measuring landscape integrity (LI): development of a hybrid methodology for planning applications

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Landscape integrity data-sets represent a measure of a landscape's naturalness, or its inverse, the level of human modification. Generally referred to as human footprint modeling, a hybrid approach was developed here by incorporating distance, density, and spatially explicit fuzzy logic methods for quantifying the impacts of anthropocentric infrastructure on the landscape. Integrity scores varied markedly across this large and heterogeneous landscape. A comparative analysis among peer data products revealed that this model exhibited the highest level of correlation when compared to an independently derived expert survey of expected scores. Moreover, differences in correlation were found to be statistically significant in two cases indicating robust model performance. Data products such as these may be leveraged to quantify the nature and extent of human modifications on the landscape, identify highly natural areas for conservation purposes, and may serve as an overarching umbrella for guiding and coordinating large and local-scale planning efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Environmental Planning and Management
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

integrity
Planning
planning
methodology
Fuzzy logic
Conservation
expert survey
naturalness
fuzzy mathematics
logic
footprint
conservation
infrastructure
measuring
modeling
performance
product

Keywords

  • conservation planning
  • human footprint
  • landscape integrity
  • landscape management
  • naturalness indices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{23b60dbb1a824c8697608a3e63dba563,
title = "Measuring landscape integrity (LI): development of a hybrid methodology for planning applications",
abstract = "Landscape integrity data-sets represent a measure of a landscape's naturalness, or its inverse, the level of human modification. Generally referred to as human footprint modeling, a hybrid approach was developed here by incorporating distance, density, and spatially explicit fuzzy logic methods for quantifying the impacts of anthropocentric infrastructure on the landscape. Integrity scores varied markedly across this large and heterogeneous landscape. A comparative analysis among peer data products revealed that this model exhibited the highest level of correlation when compared to an independently derived expert survey of expected scores. Moreover, differences in correlation were found to be statistically significant in two cases indicating robust model performance. Data products such as these may be leveraged to quantify the nature and extent of human modifications on the landscape, identify highly natural areas for conservation purposes, and may serve as an overarching umbrella for guiding and coordinating large and local-scale planning efforts.",
keywords = "conservation planning, human footprint, landscape integrity, landscape management, naturalness indices",
author = "Perkl, {Ryan M}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09640568.2016.1142863",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Planning and Management",
issn = "0964-0568",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring landscape integrity (LI)

T2 - development of a hybrid methodology for planning applications

AU - Perkl, Ryan M

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Landscape integrity data-sets represent a measure of a landscape's naturalness, or its inverse, the level of human modification. Generally referred to as human footprint modeling, a hybrid approach was developed here by incorporating distance, density, and spatially explicit fuzzy logic methods for quantifying the impacts of anthropocentric infrastructure on the landscape. Integrity scores varied markedly across this large and heterogeneous landscape. A comparative analysis among peer data products revealed that this model exhibited the highest level of correlation when compared to an independently derived expert survey of expected scores. Moreover, differences in correlation were found to be statistically significant in two cases indicating robust model performance. Data products such as these may be leveraged to quantify the nature and extent of human modifications on the landscape, identify highly natural areas for conservation purposes, and may serve as an overarching umbrella for guiding and coordinating large and local-scale planning efforts.

AB - Landscape integrity data-sets represent a measure of a landscape's naturalness, or its inverse, the level of human modification. Generally referred to as human footprint modeling, a hybrid approach was developed here by incorporating distance, density, and spatially explicit fuzzy logic methods for quantifying the impacts of anthropocentric infrastructure on the landscape. Integrity scores varied markedly across this large and heterogeneous landscape. A comparative analysis among peer data products revealed that this model exhibited the highest level of correlation when compared to an independently derived expert survey of expected scores. Moreover, differences in correlation were found to be statistically significant in two cases indicating robust model performance. Data products such as these may be leveraged to quantify the nature and extent of human modifications on the landscape, identify highly natural areas for conservation purposes, and may serve as an overarching umbrella for guiding and coordinating large and local-scale planning efforts.

KW - conservation planning

KW - human footprint

KW - landscape integrity

KW - landscape management

KW - naturalness indices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969718576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969718576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09640568.2016.1142863

DO - 10.1080/09640568.2016.1142863

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84969718576

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

SN - 0964-0568

ER -