Measuring network structure

H Brinton Milward, Keith G. Provan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Networks have been a research issue in public administration for many years. Because of the difficulty of measuring networks, they have often been treated as a metaphor, a conceptual scheme, or a management technique (networking). The work on networks in public administration is almost all of the case study and rarely of the comparative case variety. This article presents the results of two studies of networks using social network analysis as a technique for studying structural relationships between organizations. This technique is utilized to show both the research and practical potential of network analysis as an evaluation methodology for organizations that jointly produce a service. In the first study, the network provides mental health services to seriously mentally ill adults. In the second study, the network attempts to prevent young people from abusing drugs and alcohol. The two studies were undertaken for different reasons. The first was an elaborate comparative study of four mental health networks and the relationship between network design and performance. The second was a much simpler consulting effort to help a local prevention partnership create linkages to other community organizations. However, in both of the studies the goal was to measure the structural ties in the network based on various types of relationships that exist in a given field of practice. These linkages are ties that bind the network together and become data that can be used to compare networks on their degree and type of integration. The article makes the argument that links in a network are one way that scholars can compare networks in similar or different policy domains. At the same time, the article argues that analysing linkages in an organization's network is an effective and practical means of determining how well integrated any given organization is in a network.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)387-407
Number of pages21
JournalPublic Administration
Volume76
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1998

Fingerprint

network analysis
public administration
mental health
management counsulting
networking
metaphor
social network
health service
alcohol
drug
organization
methodology
evaluation
management
community
performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (1998). Measuring network structure. Public Administration, 76(2), 387-407.

Measuring network structure. / Milward, H Brinton; Provan, Keith G.

In: Public Administration, Vol. 76, No. 2, 06.1998, p. 387-407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Milward, HB & Provan, KG 1998, 'Measuring network structure', Public Administration, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 387-407.
Milward HB, Provan KG. Measuring network structure. Public Administration. 1998 Jun;76(2):387-407.
Milward, H Brinton ; Provan, Keith G. / Measuring network structure. In: Public Administration. 1998 ; Vol. 76, No. 2. pp. 387-407.
@article{a495f9a8a79645e8b6a95c13d84d977e,
title = "Measuring network structure",
abstract = "Networks have been a research issue in public administration for many years. Because of the difficulty of measuring networks, they have often been treated as a metaphor, a conceptual scheme, or a management technique (networking). The work on networks in public administration is almost all of the case study and rarely of the comparative case variety. This article presents the results of two studies of networks using social network analysis as a technique for studying structural relationships between organizations. This technique is utilized to show both the research and practical potential of network analysis as an evaluation methodology for organizations that jointly produce a service. In the first study, the network provides mental health services to seriously mentally ill adults. In the second study, the network attempts to prevent young people from abusing drugs and alcohol. The two studies were undertaken for different reasons. The first was an elaborate comparative study of four mental health networks and the relationship between network design and performance. The second was a much simpler consulting effort to help a local prevention partnership create linkages to other community organizations. However, in both of the studies the goal was to measure the structural ties in the network based on various types of relationships that exist in a given field of practice. These linkages are ties that bind the network together and become data that can be used to compare networks on their degree and type of integration. The article makes the argument that links in a network are one way that scholars can compare networks in similar or different policy domains. At the same time, the article argues that analysing linkages in an organization's network is an effective and practical means of determining how well integrated any given organization is in a network.",
author = "Milward, {H Brinton} and Provan, {Keith G.}",
year = "1998",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "387--407",
journal = "Public Administration",
issn = "0033-3298",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring network structure

AU - Milward, H Brinton

AU - Provan, Keith G.

PY - 1998/6

Y1 - 1998/6

N2 - Networks have been a research issue in public administration for many years. Because of the difficulty of measuring networks, they have often been treated as a metaphor, a conceptual scheme, or a management technique (networking). The work on networks in public administration is almost all of the case study and rarely of the comparative case variety. This article presents the results of two studies of networks using social network analysis as a technique for studying structural relationships between organizations. This technique is utilized to show both the research and practical potential of network analysis as an evaluation methodology for organizations that jointly produce a service. In the first study, the network provides mental health services to seriously mentally ill adults. In the second study, the network attempts to prevent young people from abusing drugs and alcohol. The two studies were undertaken for different reasons. The first was an elaborate comparative study of four mental health networks and the relationship between network design and performance. The second was a much simpler consulting effort to help a local prevention partnership create linkages to other community organizations. However, in both of the studies the goal was to measure the structural ties in the network based on various types of relationships that exist in a given field of practice. These linkages are ties that bind the network together and become data that can be used to compare networks on their degree and type of integration. The article makes the argument that links in a network are one way that scholars can compare networks in similar or different policy domains. At the same time, the article argues that analysing linkages in an organization's network is an effective and practical means of determining how well integrated any given organization is in a network.

AB - Networks have been a research issue in public administration for many years. Because of the difficulty of measuring networks, they have often been treated as a metaphor, a conceptual scheme, or a management technique (networking). The work on networks in public administration is almost all of the case study and rarely of the comparative case variety. This article presents the results of two studies of networks using social network analysis as a technique for studying structural relationships between organizations. This technique is utilized to show both the research and practical potential of network analysis as an evaluation methodology for organizations that jointly produce a service. In the first study, the network provides mental health services to seriously mentally ill adults. In the second study, the network attempts to prevent young people from abusing drugs and alcohol. The two studies were undertaken for different reasons. The first was an elaborate comparative study of four mental health networks and the relationship between network design and performance. The second was a much simpler consulting effort to help a local prevention partnership create linkages to other community organizations. However, in both of the studies the goal was to measure the structural ties in the network based on various types of relationships that exist in a given field of practice. These linkages are ties that bind the network together and become data that can be used to compare networks on their degree and type of integration. The article makes the argument that links in a network are one way that scholars can compare networks in similar or different policy domains. At the same time, the article argues that analysing linkages in an organization's network is an effective and practical means of determining how well integrated any given organization is in a network.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001420926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001420926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 387

EP - 407

JO - Public Administration

JF - Public Administration

SN - 0033-3298

IS - 2

ER -