Measuring the advantage of kalman-weighted averaging for auditory brainstem response hearing evaluation in infants

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purposes of this study were to (a) measure the effects of Kalman-weighted averaging methods on auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold, latency, and amplitude; (b) translate lab findings to the clinical setting; and (c) estimate cost savings when ABRs can be obtained in nonsedated infants. Method: ABRs were recorded in 40 adults with normal hearing during induced motor noise conditions using the Kalman-weighted averaging method implemented on a commercial system, the Vivosonic Integrity (Vivosonic Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada). The device was then used to test 34 infants in awake and asleep states. The advantages of the Kalman-weighted averaging method were modeled in terms of time saved for conducting an ABR evaluation. Results: Kalman-weighted ABR threshold estimates were 6–7 dB lower than with conventional methods during induced motor noise. When used to obtain ABRs in infants who were awake, the number of sweeps required to obtain a result was significantly greater than that required for a sleeping infant but well within the range for clinical application. Conclusions: The use of Kalman-weighted averaging provides a measurable advantage over conventional methods and may reduce costs for the pediatric audiology practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-168
Number of pages16
JournalAmerican Journal of Audiology
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
Hearing
Noise
Audiology
Cost Savings
Ontario
Reaction Time
Canada
Pediatrics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

@article{99434316c622494fb1cee6def8b52961,
title = "Measuring the advantage of kalman-weighted averaging for auditory brainstem response hearing evaluation in infants",
abstract = "Purpose: The purposes of this study were to (a) measure the effects of Kalman-weighted averaging methods on auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold, latency, and amplitude; (b) translate lab findings to the clinical setting; and (c) estimate cost savings when ABRs can be obtained in nonsedated infants. Method: ABRs were recorded in 40 adults with normal hearing during induced motor noise conditions using the Kalman-weighted averaging method implemented on a commercial system, the Vivosonic Integrity (Vivosonic Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada). The device was then used to test 34 infants in awake and asleep states. The advantages of the Kalman-weighted averaging method were modeled in terms of time saved for conducting an ABR evaluation. Results: Kalman-weighted ABR threshold estimates were 6–7 dB lower than with conventional methods during induced motor noise. When used to obtain ABRs in infants who were awake, the number of sweeps required to obtain a result was significantly greater than that required for a sleeping infant but well within the range for clinical application. Conclusions: The use of Kalman-weighted averaging provides a measurable advantage over conventional methods and may reduce costs for the pediatric audiology practice.",
author = "Cone-Wesson, {Barbara K} and Norrix, {Linda W}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1044/2015_AJA-14-0021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "153--168",
journal = "American Journal of Audiology",
issn = "1059-0889",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring the advantage of kalman-weighted averaging for auditory brainstem response hearing evaluation in infants

AU - Cone-Wesson, Barbara K

AU - Norrix, Linda W

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose: The purposes of this study were to (a) measure the effects of Kalman-weighted averaging methods on auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold, latency, and amplitude; (b) translate lab findings to the clinical setting; and (c) estimate cost savings when ABRs can be obtained in nonsedated infants. Method: ABRs were recorded in 40 adults with normal hearing during induced motor noise conditions using the Kalman-weighted averaging method implemented on a commercial system, the Vivosonic Integrity (Vivosonic Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada). The device was then used to test 34 infants in awake and asleep states. The advantages of the Kalman-weighted averaging method were modeled in terms of time saved for conducting an ABR evaluation. Results: Kalman-weighted ABR threshold estimates were 6–7 dB lower than with conventional methods during induced motor noise. When used to obtain ABRs in infants who were awake, the number of sweeps required to obtain a result was significantly greater than that required for a sleeping infant but well within the range for clinical application. Conclusions: The use of Kalman-weighted averaging provides a measurable advantage over conventional methods and may reduce costs for the pediatric audiology practice.

AB - Purpose: The purposes of this study were to (a) measure the effects of Kalman-weighted averaging methods on auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold, latency, and amplitude; (b) translate lab findings to the clinical setting; and (c) estimate cost savings when ABRs can be obtained in nonsedated infants. Method: ABRs were recorded in 40 adults with normal hearing during induced motor noise conditions using the Kalman-weighted averaging method implemented on a commercial system, the Vivosonic Integrity (Vivosonic Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada). The device was then used to test 34 infants in awake and asleep states. The advantages of the Kalman-weighted averaging method were modeled in terms of time saved for conducting an ABR evaluation. Results: Kalman-weighted ABR threshold estimates were 6–7 dB lower than with conventional methods during induced motor noise. When used to obtain ABRs in infants who were awake, the number of sweeps required to obtain a result was significantly greater than that required for a sleeping infant but well within the range for clinical application. Conclusions: The use of Kalman-weighted averaging provides a measurable advantage over conventional methods and may reduce costs for the pediatric audiology practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932145364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84932145364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/2015_AJA-14-0021

DO - 10.1044/2015_AJA-14-0021

M3 - Article

C2 - 25654653

AN - SCOPUS:84932145364

VL - 24

SP - 153

EP - 168

JO - American Journal of Audiology

JF - American Journal of Audiology

SN - 1059-0889

IS - 2

ER -