Measuring the complexity of lithic technology

Charles Perreault, P. Jeffrey Brantingham, Steven L Kuhn, Sarah Wurz, Xing Gao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessments of the complexity of lithic technologies coming from different time periods, regions, or hominid species are recurrent features of the literature on Paleolithic archaeology. Yet the notion of lithic complexity is often defined intuitively and qualitatively, which can easily lead to circular arguments and makes difficult the comparison of assemblages across different regions and time periods. Here we propose, in the spirit of Oswalt's techno-units, that the complexity of lithic technology can be quantified by counting the procedural units involved in tool manufacture. We define procedural units as mutually exclusive manufacturing steps that make a distinct contribution to the finished form of a technology. As a proof of concept, we use the procedural-unit approach to measure the complexity of 13 Paleolithic assemblages. While preliminary, these results provide a quantitative benchmark confirming that lithic technological complexity increased throughout the Paleolithic period. The method to measure lithic complexity outlined here will allow us to revisit several claims made about change in technological complexity during human evolution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCurrent Anthropology
Volume54
Issue numberSUPPL8.
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Lithic Technology
archaeology
manufacturing
Procedural
Lithics
Palaeolithic
Assemblages
time
Palaeolithic Archaeology
Manufacturing
Benchmark
Hominids
Human Evolution
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Archaeology
  • Archaeology

Cite this

Perreault, C., Jeffrey Brantingham, P., Kuhn, S. L., Wurz, S., & Gao, X. (2013). Measuring the complexity of lithic technology. Current Anthropology, 54(SUPPL8.). https://doi.org/10.1086/673264

Measuring the complexity of lithic technology. / Perreault, Charles; Jeffrey Brantingham, P.; Kuhn, Steven L; Wurz, Sarah; Gao, Xing.

In: Current Anthropology, Vol. 54, No. SUPPL8., 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Perreault, C, Jeffrey Brantingham, P, Kuhn, SL, Wurz, S & Gao, X 2013, 'Measuring the complexity of lithic technology', Current Anthropology, vol. 54, no. SUPPL8.. https://doi.org/10.1086/673264
Perreault C, Jeffrey Brantingham P, Kuhn SL, Wurz S, Gao X. Measuring the complexity of lithic technology. Current Anthropology. 2013;54(SUPPL8.). https://doi.org/10.1086/673264
Perreault, Charles ; Jeffrey Brantingham, P. ; Kuhn, Steven L ; Wurz, Sarah ; Gao, Xing. / Measuring the complexity of lithic technology. In: Current Anthropology. 2013 ; Vol. 54, No. SUPPL8.
@article{f64741053c354e589c04a41d6edb7b92,
title = "Measuring the complexity of lithic technology",
abstract = "Assessments of the complexity of lithic technologies coming from different time periods, regions, or hominid species are recurrent features of the literature on Paleolithic archaeology. Yet the notion of lithic complexity is often defined intuitively and qualitatively, which can easily lead to circular arguments and makes difficult the comparison of assemblages across different regions and time periods. Here we propose, in the spirit of Oswalt's techno-units, that the complexity of lithic technology can be quantified by counting the procedural units involved in tool manufacture. We define procedural units as mutually exclusive manufacturing steps that make a distinct contribution to the finished form of a technology. As a proof of concept, we use the procedural-unit approach to measure the complexity of 13 Paleolithic assemblages. While preliminary, these results provide a quantitative benchmark confirming that lithic technological complexity increased throughout the Paleolithic period. The method to measure lithic complexity outlined here will allow us to revisit several claims made about change in technological complexity during human evolution.",
author = "Charles Perreault and {Jeffrey Brantingham}, P. and Kuhn, {Steven L} and Sarah Wurz and Xing Gao",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1086/673264",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
journal = "Current Anthropology",
issn = "0011-3204",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "SUPPL8.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring the complexity of lithic technology

AU - Perreault, Charles

AU - Jeffrey Brantingham, P.

AU - Kuhn, Steven L

AU - Wurz, Sarah

AU - Gao, Xing

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Assessments of the complexity of lithic technologies coming from different time periods, regions, or hominid species are recurrent features of the literature on Paleolithic archaeology. Yet the notion of lithic complexity is often defined intuitively and qualitatively, which can easily lead to circular arguments and makes difficult the comparison of assemblages across different regions and time periods. Here we propose, in the spirit of Oswalt's techno-units, that the complexity of lithic technology can be quantified by counting the procedural units involved in tool manufacture. We define procedural units as mutually exclusive manufacturing steps that make a distinct contribution to the finished form of a technology. As a proof of concept, we use the procedural-unit approach to measure the complexity of 13 Paleolithic assemblages. While preliminary, these results provide a quantitative benchmark confirming that lithic technological complexity increased throughout the Paleolithic period. The method to measure lithic complexity outlined here will allow us to revisit several claims made about change in technological complexity during human evolution.

AB - Assessments of the complexity of lithic technologies coming from different time periods, regions, or hominid species are recurrent features of the literature on Paleolithic archaeology. Yet the notion of lithic complexity is often defined intuitively and qualitatively, which can easily lead to circular arguments and makes difficult the comparison of assemblages across different regions and time periods. Here we propose, in the spirit of Oswalt's techno-units, that the complexity of lithic technology can be quantified by counting the procedural units involved in tool manufacture. We define procedural units as mutually exclusive manufacturing steps that make a distinct contribution to the finished form of a technology. As a proof of concept, we use the procedural-unit approach to measure the complexity of 13 Paleolithic assemblages. While preliminary, these results provide a quantitative benchmark confirming that lithic technological complexity increased throughout the Paleolithic period. The method to measure lithic complexity outlined here will allow us to revisit several claims made about change in technological complexity during human evolution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893232294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893232294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/673264

DO - 10.1086/673264

M3 - Article

VL - 54

JO - Current Anthropology

JF - Current Anthropology

SN - 0011-3204

IS - SUPPL8.

ER -