Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2969 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The focus of most ideas on diversity maintenance is species coexistence, which may be stable or unstable. Stable coexistence can be quantified by the long-term rates at which community members recover from low density. Quantification shows that coexistence mechanisms function in two major ways: They may be (a) equalizing because they tend to minimize average fitness differences between species, or (b) stabilizing because they tend to increase negative intraspecific interactions relative to negative interspecific interactions. Stabilizing mechanisms are essential for species coexistence and include traditional mechanisms such as resource partitioning and frequency-dependent predation, as well as mechanisms that depend on fluctuations in population densities and environmental factors in space and time. Equalizing mechanisms contribute to stable coexistence because they reduce large average fitness inequalities which might negate the effects of stabilizing mechanisms. Models of unstable coexitence, in which species diversity slowly decays overtime, have focused almost exclusively on equalizing mechanisms. These models would be more robust if they also included stabilizing mechanisms, which arise in many and varied ways but need not be adequate for full stability of a system. Models of unstable coexistence invite a broader view of diversity maintenance incorporating species turnover.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-366
Number of pages24
JournalAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics
Volume31
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

coexistence
species diversity
space and time
population density
fitness
deterioration
predation
intraspecific interaction
environmental factors
interspecific interaction
niche partitioning
turnover
environmental factor

Keywords

  • Coexistence
  • Competition
  • Niche
  • Predation
  • Spatial and temporal variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. / Chesson, Peter.

In: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, Vol. 31, 2000, p. 343-366.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7b017e479fdb4bd7a19ebb0993fe837e,
title = "Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity",
abstract = "The focus of most ideas on diversity maintenance is species coexistence, which may be stable or unstable. Stable coexistence can be quantified by the long-term rates at which community members recover from low density. Quantification shows that coexistence mechanisms function in two major ways: They may be (a) equalizing because they tend to minimize average fitness differences between species, or (b) stabilizing because they tend to increase negative intraspecific interactions relative to negative interspecific interactions. Stabilizing mechanisms are essential for species coexistence and include traditional mechanisms such as resource partitioning and frequency-dependent predation, as well as mechanisms that depend on fluctuations in population densities and environmental factors in space and time. Equalizing mechanisms contribute to stable coexistence because they reduce large average fitness inequalities which might negate the effects of stabilizing mechanisms. Models of unstable coexitence, in which species diversity slowly decays overtime, have focused almost exclusively on equalizing mechanisms. These models would be more robust if they also included stabilizing mechanisms, which arise in many and varied ways but need not be adequate for full stability of a system. Models of unstable coexistence invite a broader view of diversity maintenance incorporating species turnover.",
keywords = "Coexistence, Competition, Niche, Predation, Spatial and temporal variation",
author = "Peter Chesson",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "343--366",
journal = "Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics",
issn = "1543-592X",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity

AU - Chesson, Peter

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The focus of most ideas on diversity maintenance is species coexistence, which may be stable or unstable. Stable coexistence can be quantified by the long-term rates at which community members recover from low density. Quantification shows that coexistence mechanisms function in two major ways: They may be (a) equalizing because they tend to minimize average fitness differences between species, or (b) stabilizing because they tend to increase negative intraspecific interactions relative to negative interspecific interactions. Stabilizing mechanisms are essential for species coexistence and include traditional mechanisms such as resource partitioning and frequency-dependent predation, as well as mechanisms that depend on fluctuations in population densities and environmental factors in space and time. Equalizing mechanisms contribute to stable coexistence because they reduce large average fitness inequalities which might negate the effects of stabilizing mechanisms. Models of unstable coexitence, in which species diversity slowly decays overtime, have focused almost exclusively on equalizing mechanisms. These models would be more robust if they also included stabilizing mechanisms, which arise in many and varied ways but need not be adequate for full stability of a system. Models of unstable coexistence invite a broader view of diversity maintenance incorporating species turnover.

AB - The focus of most ideas on diversity maintenance is species coexistence, which may be stable or unstable. Stable coexistence can be quantified by the long-term rates at which community members recover from low density. Quantification shows that coexistence mechanisms function in two major ways: They may be (a) equalizing because they tend to minimize average fitness differences between species, or (b) stabilizing because they tend to increase negative intraspecific interactions relative to negative interspecific interactions. Stabilizing mechanisms are essential for species coexistence and include traditional mechanisms such as resource partitioning and frequency-dependent predation, as well as mechanisms that depend on fluctuations in population densities and environmental factors in space and time. Equalizing mechanisms contribute to stable coexistence because they reduce large average fitness inequalities which might negate the effects of stabilizing mechanisms. Models of unstable coexitence, in which species diversity slowly decays overtime, have focused almost exclusively on equalizing mechanisms. These models would be more robust if they also included stabilizing mechanisms, which arise in many and varied ways but need not be adequate for full stability of a system. Models of unstable coexistence invite a broader view of diversity maintenance incorporating species turnover.

KW - Coexistence

KW - Competition

KW - Niche

KW - Predation

KW - Spatial and temporal variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034503114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034503114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343

DO - 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034503114

VL - 31

SP - 343

EP - 366

JO - Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

JF - Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

SN - 1543-592X

ER -