Mechanisms of water supply and vegetation demand govern the seasonality and magnitude of evapotranspiration in Amazonia and Cerrado

Bradley O. Christoffersen, Natalia Restrepo-Coupe, M. Altaf Arain, Ian T. Baker, Bruno P. Cestaro, Phillippe Ciais, Joshua B. Fisher, David Galbraith, Xiaodan Guan, Lindsey Gulden, Bart van den Hurk, Kazuhito Ichii, Hewlley Imbuzeiro, Atul Jain, Naomi Levine, Gonzalo Miguez-Macho, Ben Poulter, Debora R. Roberti, Koichi Sakaguchi, Alok SahooKevin Schaefer, Mingjie Shi, Hans Verbeeck, Zong Liang Yang, Alessandro C. Araújo, Bart Kruijt, Antonio O. Manzi, Humberto R. da Rocha, Celso von Randow, Michel N. Muza, Jordan Borak, Marcos H. Costa, Luis Gustavo Gonçalves de Gonçalves, Xubin Zeng, Scott Saleska

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evapotranspiration (E) in the Amazon connects forest function and regional climate via its role in precipitation recycling However, the mechanisms regulating water supply to vegetation and its demand for water remain poorly understood, especially during periods of seasonal water deficits In this study, we address two main questions: First, how do mechanisms of water supply (indicated by rooting depth and groundwater) and vegetation water demand (indicated by stomatal conductance and intrinsic water use efficiency) control evapotranspiration (E) along broad gradients of climate and vegetation from equatorial Amazonia to Cerrado, and second, how do these inferred mechanisms of supply and demand compare to those employed by a suite of ecosystem models? We used a network of eddy covariance towers in Brazil coupled with ancillary measurements to address these questions With respect to the magnitude and seasonality of E, models have much improved in equatorial tropical forests by eliminating most dry season water limitation, diverge in performance in transitional forests where seasonal water deficits are greater, and mostly capture the observed seasonal depressions in E at Cerrado However, many models depended universally on either deep roots or groundwater to mitigate dry season water deficits, the relative importance of which we found does not vary as a simple function of climate or vegetation In addition, canopy stomatal conductance (gs) regulates dry season vegetation demand for water at all except the wettest sites even as the seasonal cycle of E follows that of net radiation In contrast, some models simulated no seasonality in gs, even while matching the observed seasonal cycle of E. We suggest that canopy dynamics mediated by leaf phenology may play a significant role in such seasonality, a process poorly represented in models Model bias in gs and E, in turn, was related to biases arising from the simulated light response (gross primary productivity, GPP) or the intrinsic water use efficiency of photosynthesis (iWUE). We identified deficiencies in models which would not otherwise be apparent based on a simple comparison of simulated and observed rates of E. While some deficiencies can be remedied by parameter tuning, in most models they highlight the need for continued process development of belowground hydrology and in particular, the biological processes of root dynamics and leaf phenology, which via their controls on E, mediate vegetation-climate feedbacks in the tropics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-50
Number of pages18
JournalAgricultural and Forest Meteorology
Volume191
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2014

Fingerprint

cerrado
Amazonia
water supply
evapotranspiration
seasonality
vegetation
water
climate
dry season
stomatal conductance
water use efficiency
phenology
groundwater
canopy
climate feedback
demand
supply balance
eddy covariance
net radiation
rooting

Keywords

  • Canopy stomatal conductance
  • Deep roots
  • Evapotranspiration
  • Groundwater
  • Intrinsic water use efficiency
  • Tropical forest

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Forestry
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change

Cite this

Mechanisms of water supply and vegetation demand govern the seasonality and magnitude of evapotranspiration in Amazonia and Cerrado. / Christoffersen, Bradley O.; Restrepo-Coupe, Natalia; Arain, M. Altaf; Baker, Ian T.; Cestaro, Bruno P.; Ciais, Phillippe; Fisher, Joshua B.; Galbraith, David; Guan, Xiaodan; Gulden, Lindsey; van den Hurk, Bart; Ichii, Kazuhito; Imbuzeiro, Hewlley; Jain, Atul; Levine, Naomi; Miguez-Macho, Gonzalo; Poulter, Ben; Roberti, Debora R.; Sakaguchi, Koichi; Sahoo, Alok; Schaefer, Kevin; Shi, Mingjie; Verbeeck, Hans; Yang, Zong Liang; Araújo, Alessandro C.; Kruijt, Bart; Manzi, Antonio O.; da Rocha, Humberto R.; von Randow, Celso; Muza, Michel N.; Borak, Jordan; Costa, Marcos H.; Gonçalves de Gonçalves, Luis Gustavo; Zeng, Xubin; Saleska, Scott.

In: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 191, 15.06.2014, p. 33-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Christoffersen, BO, Restrepo-Coupe, N, Arain, MA, Baker, IT, Cestaro, BP, Ciais, P, Fisher, JB, Galbraith, D, Guan, X, Gulden, L, van den Hurk, B, Ichii, K, Imbuzeiro, H, Jain, A, Levine, N, Miguez-Macho, G, Poulter, B, Roberti, DR, Sakaguchi, K, Sahoo, A, Schaefer, K, Shi, M, Verbeeck, H, Yang, ZL, Araújo, AC, Kruijt, B, Manzi, AO, da Rocha, HR, von Randow, C, Muza, MN, Borak, J, Costa, MH, Gonçalves de Gonçalves, LG, Zeng, X & Saleska, S 2014, 'Mechanisms of water supply and vegetation demand govern the seasonality and magnitude of evapotranspiration in Amazonia and Cerrado', Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 191, pp. 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.02.008
Christoffersen, Bradley O. ; Restrepo-Coupe, Natalia ; Arain, M. Altaf ; Baker, Ian T. ; Cestaro, Bruno P. ; Ciais, Phillippe ; Fisher, Joshua B. ; Galbraith, David ; Guan, Xiaodan ; Gulden, Lindsey ; van den Hurk, Bart ; Ichii, Kazuhito ; Imbuzeiro, Hewlley ; Jain, Atul ; Levine, Naomi ; Miguez-Macho, Gonzalo ; Poulter, Ben ; Roberti, Debora R. ; Sakaguchi, Koichi ; Sahoo, Alok ; Schaefer, Kevin ; Shi, Mingjie ; Verbeeck, Hans ; Yang, Zong Liang ; Araújo, Alessandro C. ; Kruijt, Bart ; Manzi, Antonio O. ; da Rocha, Humberto R. ; von Randow, Celso ; Muza, Michel N. ; Borak, Jordan ; Costa, Marcos H. ; Gonçalves de Gonçalves, Luis Gustavo ; Zeng, Xubin ; Saleska, Scott. / Mechanisms of water supply and vegetation demand govern the seasonality and magnitude of evapotranspiration in Amazonia and Cerrado. In: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2014 ; Vol. 191. pp. 33-50.
@article{c66ab28f347647dbbec8184d34fb33bc,
title = "Mechanisms of water supply and vegetation demand govern the seasonality and magnitude of evapotranspiration in Amazonia and Cerrado",
abstract = "Evapotranspiration (E) in the Amazon connects forest function and regional climate via its role in precipitation recycling However, the mechanisms regulating water supply to vegetation and its demand for water remain poorly understood, especially during periods of seasonal water deficits In this study, we address two main questions: First, how do mechanisms of water supply (indicated by rooting depth and groundwater) and vegetation water demand (indicated by stomatal conductance and intrinsic water use efficiency) control evapotranspiration (E) along broad gradients of climate and vegetation from equatorial Amazonia to Cerrado, and second, how do these inferred mechanisms of supply and demand compare to those employed by a suite of ecosystem models? We used a network of eddy covariance towers in Brazil coupled with ancillary measurements to address these questions With respect to the magnitude and seasonality of E, models have much improved in equatorial tropical forests by eliminating most dry season water limitation, diverge in performance in transitional forests where seasonal water deficits are greater, and mostly capture the observed seasonal depressions in E at Cerrado However, many models depended universally on either deep roots or groundwater to mitigate dry season water deficits, the relative importance of which we found does not vary as a simple function of climate or vegetation In addition, canopy stomatal conductance (gs) regulates dry season vegetation demand for water at all except the wettest sites even as the seasonal cycle of E follows that of net radiation In contrast, some models simulated no seasonality in gs, even while matching the observed seasonal cycle of E. We suggest that canopy dynamics mediated by leaf phenology may play a significant role in such seasonality, a process poorly represented in models Model bias in gs and E, in turn, was related to biases arising from the simulated light response (gross primary productivity, GPP) or the intrinsic water use efficiency of photosynthesis (iWUE). We identified deficiencies in models which would not otherwise be apparent based on a simple comparison of simulated and observed rates of E. While some deficiencies can be remedied by parameter tuning, in most models they highlight the need for continued process development of belowground hydrology and in particular, the biological processes of root dynamics and leaf phenology, which via their controls on E, mediate vegetation-climate feedbacks in the tropics.",
keywords = "Canopy stomatal conductance, Deep roots, Evapotranspiration, Groundwater, Intrinsic water use efficiency, Tropical forest",
author = "Christoffersen, {Bradley O.} and Natalia Restrepo-Coupe and Arain, {M. Altaf} and Baker, {Ian T.} and Cestaro, {Bruno P.} and Phillippe Ciais and Fisher, {Joshua B.} and David Galbraith and Xiaodan Guan and Lindsey Gulden and {van den Hurk}, Bart and Kazuhito Ichii and Hewlley Imbuzeiro and Atul Jain and Naomi Levine and Gonzalo Miguez-Macho and Ben Poulter and Roberti, {Debora R.} and Koichi Sakaguchi and Alok Sahoo and Kevin Schaefer and Mingjie Shi and Hans Verbeeck and Yang, {Zong Liang} and Ara{\'u}jo, {Alessandro C.} and Bart Kruijt and Manzi, {Antonio O.} and {da Rocha}, {Humberto R.} and {von Randow}, Celso and Muza, {Michel N.} and Jordan Borak and Costa, {Marcos H.} and {Gon{\cc}alves de Gon{\cc}alves}, {Luis Gustavo} and Xubin Zeng and Scott Saleska",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.02.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "191",
pages = "33--50",
journal = "Agricultural and Forest Meteorology",
issn = "0168-1923",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanisms of water supply and vegetation demand govern the seasonality and magnitude of evapotranspiration in Amazonia and Cerrado

AU - Christoffersen, Bradley O.

AU - Restrepo-Coupe, Natalia

AU - Arain, M. Altaf

AU - Baker, Ian T.

AU - Cestaro, Bruno P.

AU - Ciais, Phillippe

AU - Fisher, Joshua B.

AU - Galbraith, David

AU - Guan, Xiaodan

AU - Gulden, Lindsey

AU - van den Hurk, Bart

AU - Ichii, Kazuhito

AU - Imbuzeiro, Hewlley

AU - Jain, Atul

AU - Levine, Naomi

AU - Miguez-Macho, Gonzalo

AU - Poulter, Ben

AU - Roberti, Debora R.

AU - Sakaguchi, Koichi

AU - Sahoo, Alok

AU - Schaefer, Kevin

AU - Shi, Mingjie

AU - Verbeeck, Hans

AU - Yang, Zong Liang

AU - Araújo, Alessandro C.

AU - Kruijt, Bart

AU - Manzi, Antonio O.

AU - da Rocha, Humberto R.

AU - von Randow, Celso

AU - Muza, Michel N.

AU - Borak, Jordan

AU - Costa, Marcos H.

AU - Gonçalves de Gonçalves, Luis Gustavo

AU - Zeng, Xubin

AU - Saleska, Scott

PY - 2014/6/15

Y1 - 2014/6/15

N2 - Evapotranspiration (E) in the Amazon connects forest function and regional climate via its role in precipitation recycling However, the mechanisms regulating water supply to vegetation and its demand for water remain poorly understood, especially during periods of seasonal water deficits In this study, we address two main questions: First, how do mechanisms of water supply (indicated by rooting depth and groundwater) and vegetation water demand (indicated by stomatal conductance and intrinsic water use efficiency) control evapotranspiration (E) along broad gradients of climate and vegetation from equatorial Amazonia to Cerrado, and second, how do these inferred mechanisms of supply and demand compare to those employed by a suite of ecosystem models? We used a network of eddy covariance towers in Brazil coupled with ancillary measurements to address these questions With respect to the magnitude and seasonality of E, models have much improved in equatorial tropical forests by eliminating most dry season water limitation, diverge in performance in transitional forests where seasonal water deficits are greater, and mostly capture the observed seasonal depressions in E at Cerrado However, many models depended universally on either deep roots or groundwater to mitigate dry season water deficits, the relative importance of which we found does not vary as a simple function of climate or vegetation In addition, canopy stomatal conductance (gs) regulates dry season vegetation demand for water at all except the wettest sites even as the seasonal cycle of E follows that of net radiation In contrast, some models simulated no seasonality in gs, even while matching the observed seasonal cycle of E. We suggest that canopy dynamics mediated by leaf phenology may play a significant role in such seasonality, a process poorly represented in models Model bias in gs and E, in turn, was related to biases arising from the simulated light response (gross primary productivity, GPP) or the intrinsic water use efficiency of photosynthesis (iWUE). We identified deficiencies in models which would not otherwise be apparent based on a simple comparison of simulated and observed rates of E. While some deficiencies can be remedied by parameter tuning, in most models they highlight the need for continued process development of belowground hydrology and in particular, the biological processes of root dynamics and leaf phenology, which via their controls on E, mediate vegetation-climate feedbacks in the tropics.

AB - Evapotranspiration (E) in the Amazon connects forest function and regional climate via its role in precipitation recycling However, the mechanisms regulating water supply to vegetation and its demand for water remain poorly understood, especially during periods of seasonal water deficits In this study, we address two main questions: First, how do mechanisms of water supply (indicated by rooting depth and groundwater) and vegetation water demand (indicated by stomatal conductance and intrinsic water use efficiency) control evapotranspiration (E) along broad gradients of climate and vegetation from equatorial Amazonia to Cerrado, and second, how do these inferred mechanisms of supply and demand compare to those employed by a suite of ecosystem models? We used a network of eddy covariance towers in Brazil coupled with ancillary measurements to address these questions With respect to the magnitude and seasonality of E, models have much improved in equatorial tropical forests by eliminating most dry season water limitation, diverge in performance in transitional forests where seasonal water deficits are greater, and mostly capture the observed seasonal depressions in E at Cerrado However, many models depended universally on either deep roots or groundwater to mitigate dry season water deficits, the relative importance of which we found does not vary as a simple function of climate or vegetation In addition, canopy stomatal conductance (gs) regulates dry season vegetation demand for water at all except the wettest sites even as the seasonal cycle of E follows that of net radiation In contrast, some models simulated no seasonality in gs, even while matching the observed seasonal cycle of E. We suggest that canopy dynamics mediated by leaf phenology may play a significant role in such seasonality, a process poorly represented in models Model bias in gs and E, in turn, was related to biases arising from the simulated light response (gross primary productivity, GPP) or the intrinsic water use efficiency of photosynthesis (iWUE). We identified deficiencies in models which would not otherwise be apparent based on a simple comparison of simulated and observed rates of E. While some deficiencies can be remedied by parameter tuning, in most models they highlight the need for continued process development of belowground hydrology and in particular, the biological processes of root dynamics and leaf phenology, which via their controls on E, mediate vegetation-climate feedbacks in the tropics.

KW - Canopy stomatal conductance

KW - Deep roots

KW - Evapotranspiration

KW - Groundwater

KW - Intrinsic water use efficiency

KW - Tropical forest

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896075720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896075720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.02.008

DO - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.02.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84896075720

VL - 191

SP - 33

EP - 50

JO - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

JF - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

SN - 0168-1923

ER -