Mediator Assessment, documentation, and disposition of child custody cases involving intimate partner abuse: A naturalistic evaluation of one county's practices

Connie J A Beck, Michele E Walsh, Mindy B. Mechanic, Caitilin S. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The contentious and costly nature of the adversarial process for resolving child custody disputes has prompted scholars, practitioners, and policy makers to advocate for the development and implementation of less divisive forms of dispute resolution, notably, mediation.Mediation has been championed for its potential to resolve disputes with less acrimony among disputants, reduced economic costs, increased satisfaction with outcomes, and fewer adverse consequences for family members. Despite the increasing popularity, arguments have cautioned against the use of mandated mediation when intimate partner abuse (IPA) is alleged. This research documents a mediation screening process and models mediators' decision-making process as instantiated, naturally, in one jurisdiction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)227-240
Number of pages14
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Child Custody
Dissent and Disputes
child custody
Documentation
disposition
mediation
documentation
abuse
evaluation
Administrative Personnel
Decision Making
Economics
decision-making process
popularity
family member
Costs and Cost Analysis
jurisdiction
Research
Intimate Partner Violence
Mediator

Keywords

  • Child custody
  • Court-connected mediation
  • Divorce mediation
  • Intimate partner violence
  • Parenting time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{7ea12441fd47400e937c856b80aa3801,
title = "Mediator Assessment, documentation, and disposition of child custody cases involving intimate partner abuse: A naturalistic evaluation of one county's practices",
abstract = "The contentious and costly nature of the adversarial process for resolving child custody disputes has prompted scholars, practitioners, and policy makers to advocate for the development and implementation of less divisive forms of dispute resolution, notably, mediation.Mediation has been championed for its potential to resolve disputes with less acrimony among disputants, reduced economic costs, increased satisfaction with outcomes, and fewer adverse consequences for family members. Despite the increasing popularity, arguments have cautioned against the use of mandated mediation when intimate partner abuse (IPA) is alleged. This research documents a mediation screening process and models mediators' decision-making process as instantiated, naturally, in one jurisdiction.",
keywords = "Child custody, Court-connected mediation, Divorce mediation, Intimate partner violence, Parenting time",
author = "Beck, {Connie J A} and Walsh, {Michele E} and Mechanic, {Mindy B.} and Taylor, {Caitilin S.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10979-009-9181-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "227--240",
journal = "Law and Human Behavior",
issn = "0147-7307",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mediator Assessment, documentation, and disposition of child custody cases involving intimate partner abuse

T2 - A naturalistic evaluation of one county's practices

AU - Beck, Connie J A

AU - Walsh, Michele E

AU - Mechanic, Mindy B.

AU - Taylor, Caitilin S.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - The contentious and costly nature of the adversarial process for resolving child custody disputes has prompted scholars, practitioners, and policy makers to advocate for the development and implementation of less divisive forms of dispute resolution, notably, mediation.Mediation has been championed for its potential to resolve disputes with less acrimony among disputants, reduced economic costs, increased satisfaction with outcomes, and fewer adverse consequences for family members. Despite the increasing popularity, arguments have cautioned against the use of mandated mediation when intimate partner abuse (IPA) is alleged. This research documents a mediation screening process and models mediators' decision-making process as instantiated, naturally, in one jurisdiction.

AB - The contentious and costly nature of the adversarial process for resolving child custody disputes has prompted scholars, practitioners, and policy makers to advocate for the development and implementation of less divisive forms of dispute resolution, notably, mediation.Mediation has been championed for its potential to resolve disputes with less acrimony among disputants, reduced economic costs, increased satisfaction with outcomes, and fewer adverse consequences for family members. Despite the increasing popularity, arguments have cautioned against the use of mandated mediation when intimate partner abuse (IPA) is alleged. This research documents a mediation screening process and models mediators' decision-making process as instantiated, naturally, in one jurisdiction.

KW - Child custody

KW - Court-connected mediation

KW - Divorce mediation

KW - Intimate partner violence

KW - Parenting time

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955555902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955555902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10979-009-9181-0

DO - 10.1007/s10979-009-9181-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 19412662

AN - SCOPUS:77955555902

VL - 34

SP - 227

EP - 240

JO - Law and Human Behavior

JF - Law and Human Behavior

SN - 0147-7307

IS - 3

ER -