Mediator’s Assessment of Safety Issues and Concerns (MASIC): Reliability and Validity of a New Intimate Partner Violence Screen

Viktoria Pokman, Fernanda S. Rossi, Amy Holtzworth-Munroe, Amy G. Applegate, Connie J A Beck, Brian M. D’Onofrio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated reliability and validity of the Mediator’s Assessment of Safety Issues and Concerns (MASIC), a screening interview for intimate partner violence and abuse (IPV/A) in family mediation settings. Clients at three family mediation clinics in the United States and Australia (N = 391) provided reports of the other parent’s IPV/A. Internal consistency of the total screen was excellent. A confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence that the MASIC assesses seven types of IPV/A: psychological abuse, coercive controlling behaviors, threats of severe violence, physical violence, severe physical violence, sexual violence, and stalking. Sex differences on differing types of violence victimization were generally consistent with previous research. Higher levels of victimization predicted self-reported consequences of abuse (e.g., fear, injuries). More abusive parties, as identified by their partners on the MASIC, had more Protective Orders and No Contact Orders and criminal convictions and crimes potentially related to IPV/A. Results provide initial evidence of the reliability and validity of the MASIC but more research is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)529-542
Number of pages14
JournalAssessment
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Safety
Crime Victims
Violence
Stalking
Sex Offenses
Crime
Research
Sex Characteristics
Statistical Factor Analysis
Fear
Parents
Interviews
Psychology
Intimate Partner Violence
Wounds and Injuries
Physical Abuse

Keywords

  • divorce mediation
  • domestic violence screening
  • intimate partner violence/abuse
  • violence measurement and psychometrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Mediator’s Assessment of Safety Issues and Concerns (MASIC) : Reliability and Validity of a New Intimate Partner Violence Screen. / Pokman, Viktoria; Rossi, Fernanda S.; Holtzworth-Munroe, Amy; Applegate, Amy G.; Beck, Connie J A; D’Onofrio, Brian M.

In: Assessment, Vol. 21, No. 5, 01.10.2014, p. 529-542.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pokman, Viktoria ; Rossi, Fernanda S. ; Holtzworth-Munroe, Amy ; Applegate, Amy G. ; Beck, Connie J A ; D’Onofrio, Brian M. / Mediator’s Assessment of Safety Issues and Concerns (MASIC) : Reliability and Validity of a New Intimate Partner Violence Screen. In: Assessment. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 529-542.
@article{9016841154c04e1db6fb572958f58423,
title = "Mediator’s Assessment of Safety Issues and Concerns (MASIC): Reliability and Validity of a New Intimate Partner Violence Screen",
abstract = "We investigated reliability and validity of the Mediator’s Assessment of Safety Issues and Concerns (MASIC), a screening interview for intimate partner violence and abuse (IPV/A) in family mediation settings. Clients at three family mediation clinics in the United States and Australia (N = 391) provided reports of the other parent’s IPV/A. Internal consistency of the total screen was excellent. A confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence that the MASIC assesses seven types of IPV/A: psychological abuse, coercive controlling behaviors, threats of severe violence, physical violence, severe physical violence, sexual violence, and stalking. Sex differences on differing types of violence victimization were generally consistent with previous research. Higher levels of victimization predicted self-reported consequences of abuse (e.g., fear, injuries). More abusive parties, as identified by their partners on the MASIC, had more Protective Orders and No Contact Orders and criminal convictions and crimes potentially related to IPV/A. Results provide initial evidence of the reliability and validity of the MASIC but more research is needed.",
keywords = "divorce mediation, domestic violence screening, intimate partner violence/abuse, violence measurement and psychometrics",
author = "Viktoria Pokman and Rossi, {Fernanda S.} and Amy Holtzworth-Munroe and Applegate, {Amy G.} and Beck, {Connie J A} and D’Onofrio, {Brian M.}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1073191114528372",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "529--542",
journal = "Assessment",
issn = "1073-1911",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mediator’s Assessment of Safety Issues and Concerns (MASIC)

T2 - Reliability and Validity of a New Intimate Partner Violence Screen

AU - Pokman, Viktoria

AU - Rossi, Fernanda S.

AU - Holtzworth-Munroe, Amy

AU - Applegate, Amy G.

AU - Beck, Connie J A

AU - D’Onofrio, Brian M.

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - We investigated reliability and validity of the Mediator’s Assessment of Safety Issues and Concerns (MASIC), a screening interview for intimate partner violence and abuse (IPV/A) in family mediation settings. Clients at three family mediation clinics in the United States and Australia (N = 391) provided reports of the other parent’s IPV/A. Internal consistency of the total screen was excellent. A confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence that the MASIC assesses seven types of IPV/A: psychological abuse, coercive controlling behaviors, threats of severe violence, physical violence, severe physical violence, sexual violence, and stalking. Sex differences on differing types of violence victimization were generally consistent with previous research. Higher levels of victimization predicted self-reported consequences of abuse (e.g., fear, injuries). More abusive parties, as identified by their partners on the MASIC, had more Protective Orders and No Contact Orders and criminal convictions and crimes potentially related to IPV/A. Results provide initial evidence of the reliability and validity of the MASIC but more research is needed.

AB - We investigated reliability and validity of the Mediator’s Assessment of Safety Issues and Concerns (MASIC), a screening interview for intimate partner violence and abuse (IPV/A) in family mediation settings. Clients at three family mediation clinics in the United States and Australia (N = 391) provided reports of the other parent’s IPV/A. Internal consistency of the total screen was excellent. A confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence that the MASIC assesses seven types of IPV/A: psychological abuse, coercive controlling behaviors, threats of severe violence, physical violence, severe physical violence, sexual violence, and stalking. Sex differences on differing types of violence victimization were generally consistent with previous research. Higher levels of victimization predicted self-reported consequences of abuse (e.g., fear, injuries). More abusive parties, as identified by their partners on the MASIC, had more Protective Orders and No Contact Orders and criminal convictions and crimes potentially related to IPV/A. Results provide initial evidence of the reliability and validity of the MASIC but more research is needed.

KW - divorce mediation

KW - domestic violence screening

KW - intimate partner violence/abuse

KW - violence measurement and psychometrics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907163366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907163366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1073191114528372

DO - 10.1177/1073191114528372

M3 - Article

C2 - 24671737

AN - SCOPUS:84907163366

VL - 21

SP - 529

EP - 542

JO - Assessment

JF - Assessment

SN - 1073-1911

IS - 5

ER -