Memory issues pertaining to social marketing messages about behavior enactment versus non-enactment

Dan Freeman, Stewart Shapiro, Merrie L Brucks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines efficiency issues pertaining to social marketing messages about behavior enactment (e.g., smoker) vs. non-enactment (e.g., nonsmoker). Building on a wealth of psycholinguistics research, we posit that underlying differences in the processing and storage of word concepts with affixal negations affect learning and memory for these concepts (i.e., associations with non-enactment concepts will be harder to learn and remember than associations with enactment concepts). Two experiments support our predictions, suggesting that messages about enactment will demonstrate superior efficiency. Implications of study findings are discussed in terms of possibilities for improving the efficiency of social marketing messages about non-enactment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)629-642
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Consumer Psychology
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Social Marketing
Efficiency
Psycholinguistics
Word Processing
Learning
Research
Social marketing
Enactment

Keywords

  • Affixal negation
  • Communication effects
  • Memory
  • Social marketing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Marketing

Cite this

Memory issues pertaining to social marketing messages about behavior enactment versus non-enactment. / Freeman, Dan; Shapiro, Stewart; Brucks, Merrie L.

In: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 19, No. 4, 10.2009, p. 629-642.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b7d37b7ba9d84e04be8f8b8bf09c51a2,
title = "Memory issues pertaining to social marketing messages about behavior enactment versus non-enactment",
abstract = "This article examines efficiency issues pertaining to social marketing messages about behavior enactment (e.g., smoker) vs. non-enactment (e.g., nonsmoker). Building on a wealth of psycholinguistics research, we posit that underlying differences in the processing and storage of word concepts with affixal negations affect learning and memory for these concepts (i.e., associations with non-enactment concepts will be harder to learn and remember than associations with enactment concepts). Two experiments support our predictions, suggesting that messages about enactment will demonstrate superior efficiency. Implications of study findings are discussed in terms of possibilities for improving the efficiency of social marketing messages about non-enactment.",
keywords = "Affixal negation, Communication effects, Memory, Social marketing",
author = "Dan Freeman and Stewart Shapiro and Brucks, {Merrie L}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcps.2009.01.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "629--642",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Psychology",
issn = "1057-7408",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Memory issues pertaining to social marketing messages about behavior enactment versus non-enactment

AU - Freeman, Dan

AU - Shapiro, Stewart

AU - Brucks, Merrie L

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - This article examines efficiency issues pertaining to social marketing messages about behavior enactment (e.g., smoker) vs. non-enactment (e.g., nonsmoker). Building on a wealth of psycholinguistics research, we posit that underlying differences in the processing and storage of word concepts with affixal negations affect learning and memory for these concepts (i.e., associations with non-enactment concepts will be harder to learn and remember than associations with enactment concepts). Two experiments support our predictions, suggesting that messages about enactment will demonstrate superior efficiency. Implications of study findings are discussed in terms of possibilities for improving the efficiency of social marketing messages about non-enactment.

AB - This article examines efficiency issues pertaining to social marketing messages about behavior enactment (e.g., smoker) vs. non-enactment (e.g., nonsmoker). Building on a wealth of psycholinguistics research, we posit that underlying differences in the processing and storage of word concepts with affixal negations affect learning and memory for these concepts (i.e., associations with non-enactment concepts will be harder to learn and remember than associations with enactment concepts). Two experiments support our predictions, suggesting that messages about enactment will demonstrate superior efficiency. Implications of study findings are discussed in terms of possibilities for improving the efficiency of social marketing messages about non-enactment.

KW - Affixal negation

KW - Communication effects

KW - Memory

KW - Social marketing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449641357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449641357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.01.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70449641357

VL - 19

SP - 629

EP - 642

JO - Journal of Consumer Psychology

JF - Journal of Consumer Psychology

SN - 1057-7408

IS - 4

ER -