Mentors, tormentors, and no mentors: mentoring scientists

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – A psychosocial, developmental perspective was used to examine the mentoring experiences of scientists. Little is known about the timing of when mentors first appear, the quality of these relationships, the specific mentoring support behaviors, or how scientists typically learn to mentor. The paper aims to discuss the above issues. Design/methodology/approach – The author conducted 23, semi-structured interviews with Australian scientists. Questions focussed on mentor-like support scientists received and provided. Interviews were analyzed and themes were coded using Dedoose software. Findings – Scientists who had mentors as undergraduates were more likely to report long-lasting relationships with their mentors and more positive interactions with their protégés. Scientists reported the following career mentoring behaviors: modeling how to do science, sponsorship, collaboration, and practical supervision. Important psychosocial mentoring behaviors were being approachable, building confidence and providing encouragement. Almost half of the scientists never had a mentor. Most (n=14) scientists learned to mentor by emulating their mentors. Findings highlight the prevalence of dysfunctional behaviors, even in supportive relationships. Practical implications – The findings suggest that graduate program managers might consider investing resources to improve mentoring experiences of doctoral students as this is a critical period for their professional development. Further, activities involving collaboration deserve emphasis in mentoring relationships. Originality/value – The study identified a “window” when mentoring support is important for scientists; highlighted specific behaviors that support career development in science; and clarified how some scientists learn to mentor others. Results add to the literature on dysfunctional mentoring relationships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4-17
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 25 2014

Fingerprint

mentoring
career
sponsorship
interview
science
supervision
experience
confidence
graduate
manager
methodology
interaction

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Behaviors
  • Doctoral
  • Dysfunction
  • Faculty
  • Graduate students
  • Higher education
  • Mentoring
  • Qualitative
  • Science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Mentors, tormentors, and no mentors : mentoring scientists. / Lunsford, Laura G.

In: International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, Vol. 3, No. 1, 25.02.2014, p. 4-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ca85baa407a48dea58c81395a170aff,
title = "Mentors, tormentors, and no mentors: mentoring scientists",
abstract = "Purpose – A psychosocial, developmental perspective was used to examine the mentoring experiences of scientists. Little is known about the timing of when mentors first appear, the quality of these relationships, the specific mentoring support behaviors, or how scientists typically learn to mentor. The paper aims to discuss the above issues. Design/methodology/approach – The author conducted 23, semi-structured interviews with Australian scientists. Questions focussed on mentor-like support scientists received and provided. Interviews were analyzed and themes were coded using Dedoose software. Findings – Scientists who had mentors as undergraduates were more likely to report long-lasting relationships with their mentors and more positive interactions with their prot{\'e}g{\'e}s. Scientists reported the following career mentoring behaviors: modeling how to do science, sponsorship, collaboration, and practical supervision. Important psychosocial mentoring behaviors were being approachable, building confidence and providing encouragement. Almost half of the scientists never had a mentor. Most (n=14) scientists learned to mentor by emulating their mentors. Findings highlight the prevalence of dysfunctional behaviors, even in supportive relationships. Practical implications – The findings suggest that graduate program managers might consider investing resources to improve mentoring experiences of doctoral students as this is a critical period for their professional development. Further, activities involving collaboration deserve emphasis in mentoring relationships. Originality/value – The study identified a “window” when mentoring support is important for scientists; highlighted specific behaviors that support career development in science; and clarified how some scientists learn to mentor others. Results add to the literature on dysfunctional mentoring relationships.",
keywords = "Australia, Behaviors, Doctoral, Dysfunction, Faculty, Graduate students, Higher education, Mentoring, Qualitative, Science",
author = "Lunsford, {Laura G}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1108/IJMCE-02-2013-0007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "4--17",
journal = "International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education",
issn = "2046-6854",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mentors, tormentors, and no mentors

T2 - mentoring scientists

AU - Lunsford, Laura G

PY - 2014/2/25

Y1 - 2014/2/25

N2 - Purpose – A psychosocial, developmental perspective was used to examine the mentoring experiences of scientists. Little is known about the timing of when mentors first appear, the quality of these relationships, the specific mentoring support behaviors, or how scientists typically learn to mentor. The paper aims to discuss the above issues. Design/methodology/approach – The author conducted 23, semi-structured interviews with Australian scientists. Questions focussed on mentor-like support scientists received and provided. Interviews were analyzed and themes were coded using Dedoose software. Findings – Scientists who had mentors as undergraduates were more likely to report long-lasting relationships with their mentors and more positive interactions with their protégés. Scientists reported the following career mentoring behaviors: modeling how to do science, sponsorship, collaboration, and practical supervision. Important psychosocial mentoring behaviors were being approachable, building confidence and providing encouragement. Almost half of the scientists never had a mentor. Most (n=14) scientists learned to mentor by emulating their mentors. Findings highlight the prevalence of dysfunctional behaviors, even in supportive relationships. Practical implications – The findings suggest that graduate program managers might consider investing resources to improve mentoring experiences of doctoral students as this is a critical period for their professional development. Further, activities involving collaboration deserve emphasis in mentoring relationships. Originality/value – The study identified a “window” when mentoring support is important for scientists; highlighted specific behaviors that support career development in science; and clarified how some scientists learn to mentor others. Results add to the literature on dysfunctional mentoring relationships.

AB - Purpose – A psychosocial, developmental perspective was used to examine the mentoring experiences of scientists. Little is known about the timing of when mentors first appear, the quality of these relationships, the specific mentoring support behaviors, or how scientists typically learn to mentor. The paper aims to discuss the above issues. Design/methodology/approach – The author conducted 23, semi-structured interviews with Australian scientists. Questions focussed on mentor-like support scientists received and provided. Interviews were analyzed and themes were coded using Dedoose software. Findings – Scientists who had mentors as undergraduates were more likely to report long-lasting relationships with their mentors and more positive interactions with their protégés. Scientists reported the following career mentoring behaviors: modeling how to do science, sponsorship, collaboration, and practical supervision. Important psychosocial mentoring behaviors were being approachable, building confidence and providing encouragement. Almost half of the scientists never had a mentor. Most (n=14) scientists learned to mentor by emulating their mentors. Findings highlight the prevalence of dysfunctional behaviors, even in supportive relationships. Practical implications – The findings suggest that graduate program managers might consider investing resources to improve mentoring experiences of doctoral students as this is a critical period for their professional development. Further, activities involving collaboration deserve emphasis in mentoring relationships. Originality/value – The study identified a “window” when mentoring support is important for scientists; highlighted specific behaviors that support career development in science; and clarified how some scientists learn to mentor others. Results add to the literature on dysfunctional mentoring relationships.

KW - Australia

KW - Behaviors

KW - Doctoral

KW - Dysfunction

KW - Faculty

KW - Graduate students

KW - Higher education

KW - Mentoring

KW - Qualitative

KW - Science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945484933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945484933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJMCE-02-2013-0007

DO - 10.1108/IJMCE-02-2013-0007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84945484933

VL - 3

SP - 4

EP - 17

JO - International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education

JF - International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education

SN - 2046-6854

IS - 1

ER -