Metaphor

Margaret - Reimer, Elisabeth Camp

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Metaphor has traditionally been construed as a linguistic phenomenon: as something produced and understood by speakers of natural language. So understood, metaphors are naturally viewed as linguistic expressions of a particular type, or as linguistic expressions used in a particular type of way. This linguistic conception of metaphor is adopted in this article. In doing so, the article does not intend to rule out the possibility of non-linguistic forms of metaphor. Many theorists think that non-linguistic objects (such as paintings or dance performances) or conceptual structures (like love as a journey or argument as war) should also be treated as metaphors. Indeed, the idea that metaphors are in the first instance conceptual phenomena, and linguistic devices only derivatively, is the dominant view in what is now the dominant area of metaphor research: cognitive science. In construing metaphor as linguistic, the article merely intends to impose appropriate constraints on a discussion whose focus is the understanding and analysis of metaphor within contemporary philosophy of language.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Print)9780191577451, 9780199552238
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2 2009

Fingerprint

Philosophy of Language
Natural Language
Conceptual Structure
Conception
Contemporary philosophy
Dance
Journey
Cognitive Science
Theorists

Keywords

  • Cognitive science
  • Linguistic expression
  • Metaphor
  • Natural language
  • Non-linguistic objects
  • Philosophy of language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Reimer, M. ., & Camp, E. (2009). Metaphor. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0033

Metaphor. / Reimer, Margaret -; Camp, Elisabeth.

The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, 2009.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Reimer, M & Camp, E 2009, Metaphor. in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0033
Reimer M, Camp E. Metaphor. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press. 2009 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0033
Reimer, Margaret - ; Camp, Elisabeth. / Metaphor. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, 2009.
@inbook{e5c83f006fae448baf5e9fc4fca4add2,
title = "Metaphor",
abstract = "Metaphor has traditionally been construed as a linguistic phenomenon: as something produced and understood by speakers of natural language. So understood, metaphors are naturally viewed as linguistic expressions of a particular type, or as linguistic expressions used in a particular type of way. This linguistic conception of metaphor is adopted in this article. In doing so, the article does not intend to rule out the possibility of non-linguistic forms of metaphor. Many theorists think that non-linguistic objects (such as paintings or dance performances) or conceptual structures (like love as a journey or argument as war) should also be treated as metaphors. Indeed, the idea that metaphors are in the first instance conceptual phenomena, and linguistic devices only derivatively, is the dominant view in what is now the dominant area of metaphor research: cognitive science. In construing metaphor as linguistic, the article merely intends to impose appropriate constraints on a discussion whose focus is the understanding and analysis of metaphor within contemporary philosophy of language.",
keywords = "Cognitive science, Linguistic expression, Metaphor, Natural language, Non-linguistic objects, Philosophy of language",
author = "Reimer, {Margaret -} and Elisabeth Camp",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0033",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780191577451",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Metaphor

AU - Reimer, Margaret -

AU - Camp, Elisabeth

PY - 2009/9/2

Y1 - 2009/9/2

N2 - Metaphor has traditionally been construed as a linguistic phenomenon: as something produced and understood by speakers of natural language. So understood, metaphors are naturally viewed as linguistic expressions of a particular type, or as linguistic expressions used in a particular type of way. This linguistic conception of metaphor is adopted in this article. In doing so, the article does not intend to rule out the possibility of non-linguistic forms of metaphor. Many theorists think that non-linguistic objects (such as paintings or dance performances) or conceptual structures (like love as a journey or argument as war) should also be treated as metaphors. Indeed, the idea that metaphors are in the first instance conceptual phenomena, and linguistic devices only derivatively, is the dominant view in what is now the dominant area of metaphor research: cognitive science. In construing metaphor as linguistic, the article merely intends to impose appropriate constraints on a discussion whose focus is the understanding and analysis of metaphor within contemporary philosophy of language.

AB - Metaphor has traditionally been construed as a linguistic phenomenon: as something produced and understood by speakers of natural language. So understood, metaphors are naturally viewed as linguistic expressions of a particular type, or as linguistic expressions used in a particular type of way. This linguistic conception of metaphor is adopted in this article. In doing so, the article does not intend to rule out the possibility of non-linguistic forms of metaphor. Many theorists think that non-linguistic objects (such as paintings or dance performances) or conceptual structures (like love as a journey or argument as war) should also be treated as metaphors. Indeed, the idea that metaphors are in the first instance conceptual phenomena, and linguistic devices only derivatively, is the dominant view in what is now the dominant area of metaphor research: cognitive science. In construing metaphor as linguistic, the article merely intends to impose appropriate constraints on a discussion whose focus is the understanding and analysis of metaphor within contemporary philosophy of language.

KW - Cognitive science

KW - Linguistic expression

KW - Metaphor

KW - Natural language

KW - Non-linguistic objects

KW - Philosophy of language

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924303320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924303320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0033

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552238.003.0033

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780191577451

SN - 9780199552238

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -