Methodological Considerations in Studying Individual and Family Resilience

Noel A. Card, Melissa A Barnett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article considers four methodological issues in the study of family resilience. The first focus is on measurement, in which the psychometric properties of reliability, validity, and measurement equivalence are described. The second methodological consideration is on efforts to establish causality in the absence of experimental manipulation. Here, the authors present longitudinal panel models as a prototypical approach, describing the possibilities and challenges of this and other techniques toward inferences of causality, especially in the context of family resiliency. Third, the authors consider modeling resilience as continuous versus categorical, specifically contrasting variable-centered versus person-centered conceptualizations and analytic approaches. Fourth, the authors consider the complexities of studying family resilience due to the multilevel nature of the phenomena. The article concludes with recommendations for a diversity of methodological foci as the study of family resilience advances.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)120-133
Number of pages14
JournalFamily Relations
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Causality
resilience
causality
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
equivalence
psychometrics
manipulation
human being
present

Keywords

  • Family
  • Measurement
  • Methodology
  • Resilience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Methodological Considerations in Studying Individual and Family Resilience. / Card, Noel A.; Barnett, Melissa A.

In: Family Relations, Vol. 64, No. 1, 01.02.2015, p. 120-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2e57fc9ea0d6454a99bcce6cbd578ac2,
title = "Methodological Considerations in Studying Individual and Family Resilience",
abstract = "This article considers four methodological issues in the study of family resilience. The first focus is on measurement, in which the psychometric properties of reliability, validity, and measurement equivalence are described. The second methodological consideration is on efforts to establish causality in the absence of experimental manipulation. Here, the authors present longitudinal panel models as a prototypical approach, describing the possibilities and challenges of this and other techniques toward inferences of causality, especially in the context of family resiliency. Third, the authors consider modeling resilience as continuous versus categorical, specifically contrasting variable-centered versus person-centered conceptualizations and analytic approaches. Fourth, the authors consider the complexities of studying family resilience due to the multilevel nature of the phenomena. The article concludes with recommendations for a diversity of methodological foci as the study of family resilience advances.",
keywords = "Family, Measurement, Methodology, Resilience",
author = "Card, {Noel A.} and Barnett, {Melissa A}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/fare.12102",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "120--133",
journal = "Family Relations",
issn = "0197-6664",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological Considerations in Studying Individual and Family Resilience

AU - Card, Noel A.

AU - Barnett, Melissa A

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - This article considers four methodological issues in the study of family resilience. The first focus is on measurement, in which the psychometric properties of reliability, validity, and measurement equivalence are described. The second methodological consideration is on efforts to establish causality in the absence of experimental manipulation. Here, the authors present longitudinal panel models as a prototypical approach, describing the possibilities and challenges of this and other techniques toward inferences of causality, especially in the context of family resiliency. Third, the authors consider modeling resilience as continuous versus categorical, specifically contrasting variable-centered versus person-centered conceptualizations and analytic approaches. Fourth, the authors consider the complexities of studying family resilience due to the multilevel nature of the phenomena. The article concludes with recommendations for a diversity of methodological foci as the study of family resilience advances.

AB - This article considers four methodological issues in the study of family resilience. The first focus is on measurement, in which the psychometric properties of reliability, validity, and measurement equivalence are described. The second methodological consideration is on efforts to establish causality in the absence of experimental manipulation. Here, the authors present longitudinal panel models as a prototypical approach, describing the possibilities and challenges of this and other techniques toward inferences of causality, especially in the context of family resiliency. Third, the authors consider modeling resilience as continuous versus categorical, specifically contrasting variable-centered versus person-centered conceptualizations and analytic approaches. Fourth, the authors consider the complexities of studying family resilience due to the multilevel nature of the phenomena. The article concludes with recommendations for a diversity of methodological foci as the study of family resilience advances.

KW - Family

KW - Measurement

KW - Methodology

KW - Resilience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920392761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920392761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/fare.12102

DO - 10.1111/fare.12102

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 120

EP - 133

JO - Family Relations

JF - Family Relations

SN - 0197-6664

IS - 1

ER -