Methodological Issues in Court Research: Pretrial Release Decisions for Federal Defendants

Robin Stryker, Ilene H. Nagel, John Hagan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Combining elements of “response as outcome” studies and “response as process” studies overcomes deficiencies resulting from methodological bifurcation, improves our understanding of court outcomes, and leads to theoretical transformation. Using observational and in-depth interview data to inform hypotheses and to create contextual variables, we develop and test models of the pretrial release decision for federal defendants. These models suggest that the emphasis in outcome research on defendants' ascribed status characteristics has been exaggerated. It is asserted that too little attention has been devoted to processual factors, including labeling, and to jurisdictional and organizational factors determining court outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)469-500
Number of pages32
JournalSociological Methods & Research
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1983

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological Issues in Court Research: Pretrial Release Decisions for Federal Defendants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this