Methodologically sound: Evaluating the psychometric approach to the assessment of human life history [Reply to Copping, Campbell, and Muncer, 2014]

Aurelio J Figueredo, Tomás Cabeza de Baca, Candace Jasmine Black, Rafael Antonio García, Heitor Barcellos Ferreira Fernandes, Pedro Sofio Abril Wolf, Michael Anthony Woodley of Menie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Copping, Campbell, and Muncer (2014) have recently published an article critical of the psychometric approach to the assessment of life history (LH) strategy. Their purported goal was testing for the convergent validation and examining the psychometric structure of the High-K Strategy Scale (HKSS). As much of the literature on the psychometrics of human LH during the past decade or so has emanated from our research laboratory and those of close collaborators, we have prepared this detailed response. Our response is organized into four main sections: (1) A review of psychometric methods for the assessment of human LH strategy, expounding upon the essence of our approach; (2) our theoretical/conceptual concerns regarding the critique, addressing the broader issues raised by the critique regarding the latent and hierarchical structure of LH strategy; (3) our statistical/methodological concerns regarding the critique, examining the validity and persuasiveness of the empirical case made specifically against the HKSS; and (4) our recommendations for future research that we think might be helpful in closing the gap between the psychometric and biometric approaches to measurement in this area. Clearly stating our theoretical positions, describing our existing body of work, and acknowledging their limitations should assist future researchers in planning and implementing more informed and prudent empirical research that will synthesize the psychometric approach to the assessment of LH strategy with complementary methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)299-338
Number of pages40
JournalEvolutionary Psychology
Volume13
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Empirical Research
History
Research Personnel
Life History Traits
Research

Keywords

  • Biometrics
  • Brunswik-symmetry
  • Demography
  • Evolutionary psychology
  • Life history strategy
  • Methodology
  • Psychometrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Figueredo, A. J., de Baca, T. C., Black, C. J., García, R. A., Fernandes, H. B. F., Wolf, P. S. A., & Woodley of Menie, M. A. (2015). Methodologically sound: Evaluating the psychometric approach to the assessment of human life history [Reply to Copping, Campbell, and Muncer, 2014]. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(2), 299-338.

Methodologically sound : Evaluating the psychometric approach to the assessment of human life history [Reply to Copping, Campbell, and Muncer, 2014]. / Figueredo, Aurelio J; de Baca, Tomás Cabeza; Black, Candace Jasmine; García, Rafael Antonio; Fernandes, Heitor Barcellos Ferreira; Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril; Woodley of Menie, Michael Anthony.

In: Evolutionary Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2015, p. 299-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Figueredo, AJ, de Baca, TC, Black, CJ, García, RA, Fernandes, HBF, Wolf, PSA & Woodley of Menie, MA 2015, 'Methodologically sound: Evaluating the psychometric approach to the assessment of human life history [Reply to Copping, Campbell, and Muncer, 2014]', Evolutionary Psychology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 299-338.
Figueredo, Aurelio J ; de Baca, Tomás Cabeza ; Black, Candace Jasmine ; García, Rafael Antonio ; Fernandes, Heitor Barcellos Ferreira ; Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril ; Woodley of Menie, Michael Anthony. / Methodologically sound : Evaluating the psychometric approach to the assessment of human life history [Reply to Copping, Campbell, and Muncer, 2014]. In: Evolutionary Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 299-338.
@article{13c7998ac5334be9a9072a82e52e083d,
title = "Methodologically sound: Evaluating the psychometric approach to the assessment of human life history [Reply to Copping, Campbell, and Muncer, 2014]",
abstract = "Copping, Campbell, and Muncer (2014) have recently published an article critical of the psychometric approach to the assessment of life history (LH) strategy. Their purported goal was testing for the convergent validation and examining the psychometric structure of the High-K Strategy Scale (HKSS). As much of the literature on the psychometrics of human LH during the past decade or so has emanated from our research laboratory and those of close collaborators, we have prepared this detailed response. Our response is organized into four main sections: (1) A review of psychometric methods for the assessment of human LH strategy, expounding upon the essence of our approach; (2) our theoretical/conceptual concerns regarding the critique, addressing the broader issues raised by the critique regarding the latent and hierarchical structure of LH strategy; (3) our statistical/methodological concerns regarding the critique, examining the validity and persuasiveness of the empirical case made specifically against the HKSS; and (4) our recommendations for future research that we think might be helpful in closing the gap between the psychometric and biometric approaches to measurement in this area. Clearly stating our theoretical positions, describing our existing body of work, and acknowledging their limitations should assist future researchers in planning and implementing more informed and prudent empirical research that will synthesize the psychometric approach to the assessment of LH strategy with complementary methods.",
keywords = "Biometrics, Brunswik-symmetry, Demography, Evolutionary psychology, Life history strategy, Methodology, Psychometrics",
author = "Figueredo, {Aurelio J} and {de Baca}, {Tom{\'a}s Cabeza} and Black, {Candace Jasmine} and Garc{\'i}a, {Rafael Antonio} and Fernandes, {Heitor Barcellos Ferreira} and Wolf, {Pedro Sofio Abril} and {Woodley of Menie}, {Michael Anthony}",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "299--338",
journal = "Evolutionary Psychology",
issn = "1474-7049",
publisher = "Human Nature Review",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodologically sound

T2 - Evaluating the psychometric approach to the assessment of human life history [Reply to Copping, Campbell, and Muncer, 2014]

AU - Figueredo, Aurelio J

AU - de Baca, Tomás Cabeza

AU - Black, Candace Jasmine

AU - García, Rafael Antonio

AU - Fernandes, Heitor Barcellos Ferreira

AU - Wolf, Pedro Sofio Abril

AU - Woodley of Menie, Michael Anthony

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Copping, Campbell, and Muncer (2014) have recently published an article critical of the psychometric approach to the assessment of life history (LH) strategy. Their purported goal was testing for the convergent validation and examining the psychometric structure of the High-K Strategy Scale (HKSS). As much of the literature on the psychometrics of human LH during the past decade or so has emanated from our research laboratory and those of close collaborators, we have prepared this detailed response. Our response is organized into four main sections: (1) A review of psychometric methods for the assessment of human LH strategy, expounding upon the essence of our approach; (2) our theoretical/conceptual concerns regarding the critique, addressing the broader issues raised by the critique regarding the latent and hierarchical structure of LH strategy; (3) our statistical/methodological concerns regarding the critique, examining the validity and persuasiveness of the empirical case made specifically against the HKSS; and (4) our recommendations for future research that we think might be helpful in closing the gap between the psychometric and biometric approaches to measurement in this area. Clearly stating our theoretical positions, describing our existing body of work, and acknowledging their limitations should assist future researchers in planning and implementing more informed and prudent empirical research that will synthesize the psychometric approach to the assessment of LH strategy with complementary methods.

AB - Copping, Campbell, and Muncer (2014) have recently published an article critical of the psychometric approach to the assessment of life history (LH) strategy. Their purported goal was testing for the convergent validation and examining the psychometric structure of the High-K Strategy Scale (HKSS). As much of the literature on the psychometrics of human LH during the past decade or so has emanated from our research laboratory and those of close collaborators, we have prepared this detailed response. Our response is organized into four main sections: (1) A review of psychometric methods for the assessment of human LH strategy, expounding upon the essence of our approach; (2) our theoretical/conceptual concerns regarding the critique, addressing the broader issues raised by the critique regarding the latent and hierarchical structure of LH strategy; (3) our statistical/methodological concerns regarding the critique, examining the validity and persuasiveness of the empirical case made specifically against the HKSS; and (4) our recommendations for future research that we think might be helpful in closing the gap between the psychometric and biometric approaches to measurement in this area. Clearly stating our theoretical positions, describing our existing body of work, and acknowledging their limitations should assist future researchers in planning and implementing more informed and prudent empirical research that will synthesize the psychometric approach to the assessment of LH strategy with complementary methods.

KW - Biometrics

KW - Brunswik-symmetry

KW - Demography

KW - Evolutionary psychology

KW - Life history strategy

KW - Methodology

KW - Psychometrics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928989629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928989629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 25844774

AN - SCOPUS:84928989629

VL - 13

SP - 299

EP - 338

JO - Evolutionary Psychology

JF - Evolutionary Psychology

SN - 1474-7049

IS - 2

ER -