Metropolitan planning organization voting structure and transit investment bias: Preliminary analysis with social equity implications

Arthur Christian Nelson, Thomas W. Sanchez, James F. Wolf, Mary Beth Farquhar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) are the conduit through which billions of federal and state transportation dollars are funneled annually for regional transportation faculties. MPO transportation investments are guided by long-term regional transportation plans that are implemented through short-term transportation improvement plans. Because transportation investments shape land use patterns, decisions by MPOs have important implications for regional land use patterns and, by implication, social equity. For their part, MPO decisions are made by a board whose composition varies widely across the nation. They are not elected to serve on the MPO, however, and MPOs are not required by federal law to have balance in voting. Therefore, the potential exists for MPO decisions to be biased and favor certain investments beneficial to particular metropolitan areas' interests at the expense of others. This study reviews MPOs generally, discusses variation in their voting structures, and reports results from a statistical analysis on the pattern of transportation investments with respect to MPO voting structure. It was found that for each suburban MPO voting member, controlling for other factors, MPO investments are shifted 1% to 9% away from transit (and other modes) to highways. Implications for land use patterns and especially social equity are described. More research should be undertaken, however, to confirm whether and the extent to which such bias exists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalTransportation Research Record
Issue number1895
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Planning
Land use
Statistical methods
Chemical analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Metropolitan planning organization voting structure and transit investment bias : Preliminary analysis with social equity implications. / Nelson, Arthur Christian; Sanchez, Thomas W.; Wolf, James F.; Farquhar, Mary Beth.

In: Transportation Research Record, No. 1895, 2004, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da65c58db96640489c7f01b607051b2c,
title = "Metropolitan planning organization voting structure and transit investment bias: Preliminary analysis with social equity implications",
abstract = "Metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) are the conduit through which billions of federal and state transportation dollars are funneled annually for regional transportation faculties. MPO transportation investments are guided by long-term regional transportation plans that are implemented through short-term transportation improvement plans. Because transportation investments shape land use patterns, decisions by MPOs have important implications for regional land use patterns and, by implication, social equity. For their part, MPO decisions are made by a board whose composition varies widely across the nation. They are not elected to serve on the MPO, however, and MPOs are not required by federal law to have balance in voting. Therefore, the potential exists for MPO decisions to be biased and favor certain investments beneficial to particular metropolitan areas' interests at the expense of others. This study reviews MPOs generally, discusses variation in their voting structures, and reports results from a statistical analysis on the pattern of transportation investments with respect to MPO voting structure. It was found that for each suburban MPO voting member, controlling for other factors, MPO investments are shifted 1{\%} to 9{\%} away from transit (and other modes) to highways. Implications for land use patterns and especially social equity are described. More research should be undertaken, however, to confirm whether and the extent to which such bias exists.",
author = "Nelson, {Arthur Christian} and Sanchez, {Thomas W.} and Wolf, {James F.} and Farquhar, {Mary Beth}",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",
number = "1895",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metropolitan planning organization voting structure and transit investment bias

T2 - Preliminary analysis with social equity implications

AU - Nelson, Arthur Christian

AU - Sanchez, Thomas W.

AU - Wolf, James F.

AU - Farquhar, Mary Beth

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) are the conduit through which billions of federal and state transportation dollars are funneled annually for regional transportation faculties. MPO transportation investments are guided by long-term regional transportation plans that are implemented through short-term transportation improvement plans. Because transportation investments shape land use patterns, decisions by MPOs have important implications for regional land use patterns and, by implication, social equity. For their part, MPO decisions are made by a board whose composition varies widely across the nation. They are not elected to serve on the MPO, however, and MPOs are not required by federal law to have balance in voting. Therefore, the potential exists for MPO decisions to be biased and favor certain investments beneficial to particular metropolitan areas' interests at the expense of others. This study reviews MPOs generally, discusses variation in their voting structures, and reports results from a statistical analysis on the pattern of transportation investments with respect to MPO voting structure. It was found that for each suburban MPO voting member, controlling for other factors, MPO investments are shifted 1% to 9% away from transit (and other modes) to highways. Implications for land use patterns and especially social equity are described. More research should be undertaken, however, to confirm whether and the extent to which such bias exists.

AB - Metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) are the conduit through which billions of federal and state transportation dollars are funneled annually for regional transportation faculties. MPO transportation investments are guided by long-term regional transportation plans that are implemented through short-term transportation improvement plans. Because transportation investments shape land use patterns, decisions by MPOs have important implications for regional land use patterns and, by implication, social equity. For their part, MPO decisions are made by a board whose composition varies widely across the nation. They are not elected to serve on the MPO, however, and MPOs are not required by federal law to have balance in voting. Therefore, the potential exists for MPO decisions to be biased and favor certain investments beneficial to particular metropolitan areas' interests at the expense of others. This study reviews MPOs generally, discusses variation in their voting structures, and reports results from a statistical analysis on the pattern of transportation investments with respect to MPO voting structure. It was found that for each suburban MPO voting member, controlling for other factors, MPO investments are shifted 1% to 9% away from transit (and other modes) to highways. Implications for land use patterns and especially social equity are described. More research should be undertaken, however, to confirm whether and the extent to which such bias exists.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17444426335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17444426335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:17444426335

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

IS - 1895

ER -