Microvariation in Caribbean/non Caribbean Spanish interrogatives

Francisco Ordóñez, Antonio - Olarrea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper is a comparative study in the micro-variation of the syntax of interrogatives in Caribbean versus non Caribbean Spanish. In field work done by us, we show that the lack of inversion effects with subjects in Caribbean Spanish only occurs with pronominal elements. We characterize those pronominal subjects as weak pronouns in the sense of Cardinaletti and Starke (1999) and we assume they land preverbally in Spec AGRS. We argue that inversion involves IP movement to an exploded CP as Kayne and Pollock (2001). The IP that moves to the exploded CP contains preverbal weak pronominals in Caribbean Spanish. Non Caribbean Spanish lacks these weak pronominals and therefore subjects are either in situ (postverbal) or have been topicalized to the CP, previous movement of the whole IP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-96
Number of pages38
JournalProbus
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

lack
syntax
Interrogatives
Caribbean Spanish
Pronominal
Inversion
In Situ
Comparative Study
Syntax
Field Work
Weak Pronouns

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Microvariation in Caribbean/non Caribbean Spanish interrogatives. / Ordóñez, Francisco; Olarrea, Antonio -.

In: Probus, Vol. 18, No. 1, 04.2006, p. 59-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ordóñez, Francisco ; Olarrea, Antonio -. / Microvariation in Caribbean/non Caribbean Spanish interrogatives. In: Probus. 2006 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 59-96.
@article{728bf5bec7f6460b9b870770e6d7b651,
title = "Microvariation in Caribbean/non Caribbean Spanish interrogatives",
abstract = "This paper is a comparative study in the micro-variation of the syntax of interrogatives in Caribbean versus non Caribbean Spanish. In field work done by us, we show that the lack of inversion effects with subjects in Caribbean Spanish only occurs with pronominal elements. We characterize those pronominal subjects as weak pronouns in the sense of Cardinaletti and Starke (1999) and we assume they land preverbally in Spec AGRS. We argue that inversion involves IP movement to an exploded CP as Kayne and Pollock (2001). The IP that moves to the exploded CP contains preverbal weak pronominals in Caribbean Spanish. Non Caribbean Spanish lacks these weak pronominals and therefore subjects are either in situ (postverbal) or have been topicalized to the CP, previous movement of the whole IP.",
author = "Francisco Ord{\'o}{\~n}ez and Olarrea, {Antonio -}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1515/PROBUS.2006.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "59--96",
journal = "Probus",
issn = "0921-4771",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microvariation in Caribbean/non Caribbean Spanish interrogatives

AU - Ordóñez, Francisco

AU - Olarrea, Antonio -

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - This paper is a comparative study in the micro-variation of the syntax of interrogatives in Caribbean versus non Caribbean Spanish. In field work done by us, we show that the lack of inversion effects with subjects in Caribbean Spanish only occurs with pronominal elements. We characterize those pronominal subjects as weak pronouns in the sense of Cardinaletti and Starke (1999) and we assume they land preverbally in Spec AGRS. We argue that inversion involves IP movement to an exploded CP as Kayne and Pollock (2001). The IP that moves to the exploded CP contains preverbal weak pronominals in Caribbean Spanish. Non Caribbean Spanish lacks these weak pronominals and therefore subjects are either in situ (postverbal) or have been topicalized to the CP, previous movement of the whole IP.

AB - This paper is a comparative study in the micro-variation of the syntax of interrogatives in Caribbean versus non Caribbean Spanish. In field work done by us, we show that the lack of inversion effects with subjects in Caribbean Spanish only occurs with pronominal elements. We characterize those pronominal subjects as weak pronouns in the sense of Cardinaletti and Starke (1999) and we assume they land preverbally in Spec AGRS. We argue that inversion involves IP movement to an exploded CP as Kayne and Pollock (2001). The IP that moves to the exploded CP contains preverbal weak pronominals in Caribbean Spanish. Non Caribbean Spanish lacks these weak pronominals and therefore subjects are either in situ (postverbal) or have been topicalized to the CP, previous movement of the whole IP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248699078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248699078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/PROBUS.2006.003

DO - 10.1515/PROBUS.2006.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34248699078

VL - 18

SP - 59

EP - 96

JO - Probus

JF - Probus

SN - 0921-4771

IS - 1

ER -