Minimal Access Surgery of Ascending and Proximal Arch of the Aorta

A 9-Year Experience

Minoru Tabata, Zain I Khalpey, Sary F. Aranki, Gregory S. Couper, Lawrence H. Cohn, Prem S. Shekar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Minimal access approaches are becoming readily accepted techniques for cardiac valve surgery. However, the safety or benefit of this approach for aortic surgery has not been well investigated. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 128 consecutive patients who underwent ascending aortic replacement (n = 53), proximal aortic arch replacement (n = 7), aortic root replacement (n = 67), or sinus of Valsalva aneurysm repair (n = 1) through an upper hemisternotomy between August 1996 and May 2005. Using matched variables (age, type of procedure, redo operation, and use of circulatory arrest), we constructed two matched cohorts of 79 patients each: a minimally invasive (group A) and full sternotomy (group B) and compared outcomes. Results: The mean age for the minimally invasive group (n = 128) was 54 years (range, 25 to 83 years). There were six reoperations (4.7%), five (3.9%) urgent operations, and 16 (12.5%) deep hypothermic circulatory arrests. Operative mortality was zero, the median length of hospital stay was 5 days (range, 3 to 21 days), and 112 patients (82.4%) were discharged home. Actuarial survival at 5 years was 97.2%. On comparison between group A and B, there was no significant difference in operative times, mortality, and morbidity. However, group A had shorter median length of stay (5 versus 6 days, p = 0.020) and fewer median units of red blood cell transfusion than group B (2 versus 2.5, p = 0.020). Conclusions: An upper hemisternotomy approach is safe and feasible for ascending aortic and proximal arch surgical procedures, with excellent early and late outcomes. This approach is associated with shorter hospital stay and less blood transfusion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-72
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume84
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thoracic Aorta
Length of Stay
Deep Hypothermia Induced Circulatory Arrest
Sinus of Valsalva
Erythrocyte Transfusion
Sternotomy
Mortality
Heart Valves
Operative Time
Reoperation
Blood Transfusion
Thoracic Surgery
Aneurysm
Morbidity
Safety
Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Minimal Access Surgery of Ascending and Proximal Arch of the Aorta : A 9-Year Experience. / Tabata, Minoru; Khalpey, Zain I; Aranki, Sary F.; Couper, Gregory S.; Cohn, Lawrence H.; Shekar, Prem S.

In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 84, No. 1, 07.2007, p. 67-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tabata, Minoru ; Khalpey, Zain I ; Aranki, Sary F. ; Couper, Gregory S. ; Cohn, Lawrence H. ; Shekar, Prem S. / Minimal Access Surgery of Ascending and Proximal Arch of the Aorta : A 9-Year Experience. In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2007 ; Vol. 84, No. 1. pp. 67-72.
@article{f4ec1af3842149478a081f8413e3e067,
title = "Minimal Access Surgery of Ascending and Proximal Arch of the Aorta: A 9-Year Experience",
abstract = "Background: Minimal access approaches are becoming readily accepted techniques for cardiac valve surgery. However, the safety or benefit of this approach for aortic surgery has not been well investigated. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 128 consecutive patients who underwent ascending aortic replacement (n = 53), proximal aortic arch replacement (n = 7), aortic root replacement (n = 67), or sinus of Valsalva aneurysm repair (n = 1) through an upper hemisternotomy between August 1996 and May 2005. Using matched variables (age, type of procedure, redo operation, and use of circulatory arrest), we constructed two matched cohorts of 79 patients each: a minimally invasive (group A) and full sternotomy (group B) and compared outcomes. Results: The mean age for the minimally invasive group (n = 128) was 54 years (range, 25 to 83 years). There were six reoperations (4.7{\%}), five (3.9{\%}) urgent operations, and 16 (12.5{\%}) deep hypothermic circulatory arrests. Operative mortality was zero, the median length of hospital stay was 5 days (range, 3 to 21 days), and 112 patients (82.4{\%}) were discharged home. Actuarial survival at 5 years was 97.2{\%}. On comparison between group A and B, there was no significant difference in operative times, mortality, and morbidity. However, group A had shorter median length of stay (5 versus 6 days, p = 0.020) and fewer median units of red blood cell transfusion than group B (2 versus 2.5, p = 0.020). Conclusions: An upper hemisternotomy approach is safe and feasible for ascending aortic and proximal arch surgical procedures, with excellent early and late outcomes. This approach is associated with shorter hospital stay and less blood transfusion.",
author = "Minoru Tabata and Khalpey, {Zain I} and Aranki, {Sary F.} and Couper, {Gregory S.} and Cohn, {Lawrence H.} and Shekar, {Prem S.}",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "67--72",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimal Access Surgery of Ascending and Proximal Arch of the Aorta

T2 - A 9-Year Experience

AU - Tabata, Minoru

AU - Khalpey, Zain I

AU - Aranki, Sary F.

AU - Couper, Gregory S.

AU - Cohn, Lawrence H.

AU - Shekar, Prem S.

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Background: Minimal access approaches are becoming readily accepted techniques for cardiac valve surgery. However, the safety or benefit of this approach for aortic surgery has not been well investigated. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 128 consecutive patients who underwent ascending aortic replacement (n = 53), proximal aortic arch replacement (n = 7), aortic root replacement (n = 67), or sinus of Valsalva aneurysm repair (n = 1) through an upper hemisternotomy between August 1996 and May 2005. Using matched variables (age, type of procedure, redo operation, and use of circulatory arrest), we constructed two matched cohorts of 79 patients each: a minimally invasive (group A) and full sternotomy (group B) and compared outcomes. Results: The mean age for the minimally invasive group (n = 128) was 54 years (range, 25 to 83 years). There were six reoperations (4.7%), five (3.9%) urgent operations, and 16 (12.5%) deep hypothermic circulatory arrests. Operative mortality was zero, the median length of hospital stay was 5 days (range, 3 to 21 days), and 112 patients (82.4%) were discharged home. Actuarial survival at 5 years was 97.2%. On comparison between group A and B, there was no significant difference in operative times, mortality, and morbidity. However, group A had shorter median length of stay (5 versus 6 days, p = 0.020) and fewer median units of red blood cell transfusion than group B (2 versus 2.5, p = 0.020). Conclusions: An upper hemisternotomy approach is safe and feasible for ascending aortic and proximal arch surgical procedures, with excellent early and late outcomes. This approach is associated with shorter hospital stay and less blood transfusion.

AB - Background: Minimal access approaches are becoming readily accepted techniques for cardiac valve surgery. However, the safety or benefit of this approach for aortic surgery has not been well investigated. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 128 consecutive patients who underwent ascending aortic replacement (n = 53), proximal aortic arch replacement (n = 7), aortic root replacement (n = 67), or sinus of Valsalva aneurysm repair (n = 1) through an upper hemisternotomy between August 1996 and May 2005. Using matched variables (age, type of procedure, redo operation, and use of circulatory arrest), we constructed two matched cohorts of 79 patients each: a minimally invasive (group A) and full sternotomy (group B) and compared outcomes. Results: The mean age for the minimally invasive group (n = 128) was 54 years (range, 25 to 83 years). There were six reoperations (4.7%), five (3.9%) urgent operations, and 16 (12.5%) deep hypothermic circulatory arrests. Operative mortality was zero, the median length of hospital stay was 5 days (range, 3 to 21 days), and 112 patients (82.4%) were discharged home. Actuarial survival at 5 years was 97.2%. On comparison between group A and B, there was no significant difference in operative times, mortality, and morbidity. However, group A had shorter median length of stay (5 versus 6 days, p = 0.020) and fewer median units of red blood cell transfusion than group B (2 versus 2.5, p = 0.020). Conclusions: An upper hemisternotomy approach is safe and feasible for ascending aortic and proximal arch surgical procedures, with excellent early and late outcomes. This approach is associated with shorter hospital stay and less blood transfusion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250350109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250350109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.029

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.029

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 67

EP - 72

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 1

ER -