Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty

Thorsten Wagener, Hoshin Vijai Gupta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

205 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Methods for the identification of models for hydrological forecasting have to consider the specific nature of these models and the uncertainties present in the modeling process. Current approaches fail to fully incorporate these two aspects. In this paper we review the nature of hydrological models and the consequences of this nature for the task of model identification. We then continue to discuss the history ("The need for more POWER"), the current state ("Learning from other fields") and the future ("Towards a general framework") of model identification. The discussion closes with a list of desirable features for an identification framework under uncertainty and open research questions in need of answers before such a framework can be implemented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)378-387
Number of pages10
JournalStochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Model Identification
Forecasting
Identification (control systems)
Uncertainty
Process Modeling
Continue
Model
learning
Framework
history
modeling
need

Keywords

  • Data assimilation
  • Flood forecasting
  • Hydrological models
  • Model identification
  • Model realism
  • Predictions in ungauged basins
  • Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty. / Wagener, Thorsten; Gupta, Hoshin Vijai.

In: Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, Vol. 19, No. 6, 12.2005, p. 378-387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{41695b2e968e46238beeda32e1418219,
title = "Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty",
abstract = "Methods for the identification of models for hydrological forecasting have to consider the specific nature of these models and the uncertainties present in the modeling process. Current approaches fail to fully incorporate these two aspects. In this paper we review the nature of hydrological models and the consequences of this nature for the task of model identification. We then continue to discuss the history ({"}The need for more POWER{"}), the current state ({"}Learning from other fields{"}) and the future ({"}Towards a general framework{"}) of model identification. The discussion closes with a list of desirable features for an identification framework under uncertainty and open research questions in need of answers before such a framework can be implemented.",
keywords = "Data assimilation, Flood forecasting, Hydrological models, Model identification, Model realism, Predictions in ungauged basins, Uncertainty",
author = "Thorsten Wagener and Gupta, {Hoshin Vijai}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s00477-005-0006-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "378--387",
journal = "Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment",
issn = "1436-3240",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty

AU - Wagener, Thorsten

AU - Gupta, Hoshin Vijai

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Methods for the identification of models for hydrological forecasting have to consider the specific nature of these models and the uncertainties present in the modeling process. Current approaches fail to fully incorporate these two aspects. In this paper we review the nature of hydrological models and the consequences of this nature for the task of model identification. We then continue to discuss the history ("The need for more POWER"), the current state ("Learning from other fields") and the future ("Towards a general framework") of model identification. The discussion closes with a list of desirable features for an identification framework under uncertainty and open research questions in need of answers before such a framework can be implemented.

AB - Methods for the identification of models for hydrological forecasting have to consider the specific nature of these models and the uncertainties present in the modeling process. Current approaches fail to fully incorporate these two aspects. In this paper we review the nature of hydrological models and the consequences of this nature for the task of model identification. We then continue to discuss the history ("The need for more POWER"), the current state ("Learning from other fields") and the future ("Towards a general framework") of model identification. The discussion closes with a list of desirable features for an identification framework under uncertainty and open research questions in need of answers before such a framework can be implemented.

KW - Data assimilation

KW - Flood forecasting

KW - Hydrological models

KW - Model identification

KW - Model realism

KW - Predictions in ungauged basins

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29144451373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29144451373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00477-005-0006-5

DO - 10.1007/s00477-005-0006-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:29144451373

VL - 19

SP - 378

EP - 387

JO - Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment

JF - Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment

SN - 1436-3240

IS - 6

ER -