Modeling knowledge diffusion in scientific innovation networks

an institutional comparison between China and US with illustration for nanotechnology

Xuan Liu, Shan Jiang, Hsinchun Chen, Catherine A. Larson, Mihail C. Roco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Knowledge is a crucial asset in organizations and its diffusion and recombination processes can be affected by numerous factors. This study examines the influence of the status of individual researchers in social networks on the knowledge diffusion and recombination process. We contend that knowledge diversity, random diffusion, and parallel duplication are three primary factors characterizing diffusion paths in knowledge networks. Using multiple social network measures, we investigate how individuals in the respective institutional collaboration networks influence knowledge diffusion through scientific papers. Scientific publication data and citation data from six prolific institutions in China (Chinese Academy of Sciences) and the United States (University of California at Berkeley, University of Illinois, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northwestern University, and Georgia Institute of Technology) in nanotechnology field in the interval 2000–2010 were used for empirical analysis, and the Cox regression model was leveraged to analyze the temporal relationships between knowledge diffusion and social network measures of researchers in these leading institutions. Results show that structural holes and degree centrality are the most effective measures to explain the knowledge diffusion process within these six institutions. Knowledge recombination is mainly achieved through parallel duplication within groups and recombination of diverse knowledge across different groups. The results are similar for all six institutions except for Bonacich power and eigenvector measures, which may posit cultural difference across countries and institutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1953-1984
Number of pages32
JournalScientometrics
Volume105
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Academy of Sciences
nanotechnology
Nanotechnology
Innovation
innovation
knowledge
social network
institute of technology
Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions
cultural difference
assets
Group
regression

Keywords

  • Boundary spanning position
  • Cox regression model
  • Knowledge diffusion
  • Knowledge flow characteristics
  • Nanoscale science and engineering
  • Social network analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Law

Cite this

Modeling knowledge diffusion in scientific innovation networks : an institutional comparison between China and US with illustration for nanotechnology. / Liu, Xuan; Jiang, Shan; Chen, Hsinchun; Larson, Catherine A.; Roco, Mihail C.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 105, No. 3, 01.12.2015, p. 1953-1984.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8314a0ffba8848a18d3c5782c73783dd,
title = "Modeling knowledge diffusion in scientific innovation networks: an institutional comparison between China and US with illustration for nanotechnology",
abstract = "Knowledge is a crucial asset in organizations and its diffusion and recombination processes can be affected by numerous factors. This study examines the influence of the status of individual researchers in social networks on the knowledge diffusion and recombination process. We contend that knowledge diversity, random diffusion, and parallel duplication are three primary factors characterizing diffusion paths in knowledge networks. Using multiple social network measures, we investigate how individuals in the respective institutional collaboration networks influence knowledge diffusion through scientific papers. Scientific publication data and citation data from six prolific institutions in China (Chinese Academy of Sciences) and the United States (University of California at Berkeley, University of Illinois, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northwestern University, and Georgia Institute of Technology) in nanotechnology field in the interval 2000–2010 were used for empirical analysis, and the Cox regression model was leveraged to analyze the temporal relationships between knowledge diffusion and social network measures of researchers in these leading institutions. Results show that structural holes and degree centrality are the most effective measures to explain the knowledge diffusion process within these six institutions. Knowledge recombination is mainly achieved through parallel duplication within groups and recombination of diverse knowledge across different groups. The results are similar for all six institutions except for Bonacich power and eigenvector measures, which may posit cultural difference across countries and institutions.",
keywords = "Boundary spanning position, Cox regression model, Knowledge diffusion, Knowledge flow characteristics, Nanoscale science and engineering, Social network analysis",
author = "Xuan Liu and Shan Jiang and Hsinchun Chen and Larson, {Catherine A.} and Roco, {Mihail C.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-015-1761-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "1953--1984",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling knowledge diffusion in scientific innovation networks

T2 - an institutional comparison between China and US with illustration for nanotechnology

AU - Liu, Xuan

AU - Jiang, Shan

AU - Chen, Hsinchun

AU - Larson, Catherine A.

AU - Roco, Mihail C.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Knowledge is a crucial asset in organizations and its diffusion and recombination processes can be affected by numerous factors. This study examines the influence of the status of individual researchers in social networks on the knowledge diffusion and recombination process. We contend that knowledge diversity, random diffusion, and parallel duplication are three primary factors characterizing diffusion paths in knowledge networks. Using multiple social network measures, we investigate how individuals in the respective institutional collaboration networks influence knowledge diffusion through scientific papers. Scientific publication data and citation data from six prolific institutions in China (Chinese Academy of Sciences) and the United States (University of California at Berkeley, University of Illinois, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northwestern University, and Georgia Institute of Technology) in nanotechnology field in the interval 2000–2010 were used for empirical analysis, and the Cox regression model was leveraged to analyze the temporal relationships between knowledge diffusion and social network measures of researchers in these leading institutions. Results show that structural holes and degree centrality are the most effective measures to explain the knowledge diffusion process within these six institutions. Knowledge recombination is mainly achieved through parallel duplication within groups and recombination of diverse knowledge across different groups. The results are similar for all six institutions except for Bonacich power and eigenvector measures, which may posit cultural difference across countries and institutions.

AB - Knowledge is a crucial asset in organizations and its diffusion and recombination processes can be affected by numerous factors. This study examines the influence of the status of individual researchers in social networks on the knowledge diffusion and recombination process. We contend that knowledge diversity, random diffusion, and parallel duplication are three primary factors characterizing diffusion paths in knowledge networks. Using multiple social network measures, we investigate how individuals in the respective institutional collaboration networks influence knowledge diffusion through scientific papers. Scientific publication data and citation data from six prolific institutions in China (Chinese Academy of Sciences) and the United States (University of California at Berkeley, University of Illinois, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northwestern University, and Georgia Institute of Technology) in nanotechnology field in the interval 2000–2010 were used for empirical analysis, and the Cox regression model was leveraged to analyze the temporal relationships between knowledge diffusion and social network measures of researchers in these leading institutions. Results show that structural holes and degree centrality are the most effective measures to explain the knowledge diffusion process within these six institutions. Knowledge recombination is mainly achieved through parallel duplication within groups and recombination of diverse knowledge across different groups. The results are similar for all six institutions except for Bonacich power and eigenvector measures, which may posit cultural difference across countries and institutions.

KW - Boundary spanning position

KW - Cox regression model

KW - Knowledge diffusion

KW - Knowledge flow characteristics

KW - Nanoscale science and engineering

KW - Social network analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947128643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947128643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-015-1761-9

DO - 10.1007/s11192-015-1761-9

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 1953

EP - 1984

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 3

ER -