Modelling luminous-blue-variable isolation

Mojgan Aghakhanloo, Jeremiah W. Murphy, Nathan Smith, Renée Hložek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Observations show that luminous blue variables (LBVs) are far more dispersed than massive O-type stars, and Smith & Tombleson suggested that these large separations are inconsistent with a single-star evolution model of LBVs. Instead, they suggested that the large distances are most consistent with binary evolution scenarios. To test these suggestions, we modelled young stellar clusters and their passive dissolution, and we find that, indeed, the standard single-star evolution model is mostly inconsistent with the observed LBV environments. If LBVs are single stars, then the lifetimes inferred from their luminosity and mass are far too short to be consistent with their extreme isolation. This implies that there is either an inconsistency in the luminosity-to-mass mapping or the mass-to-age mapping. In this paper, we explore binary solutions that modify the mass-to-age mapping and are consistent with the isolation of LBVs. For the binary scenarios, our crude models suggest that LBVs are rejuvenated stars. They are either the result of mergers or they are mass gainers and received a kick when the primary star exploded. In the merger scenario, if the primary is about 19 M, then the binary has enough time to wander far afield, merge and form a rejuvenated star. In the mass-gainer and kick scenario, we find that LBV isolation is consistent with a wide range of kick velocities, anywhere from 0 to ~105 km s-1. In either scenario, binarity seems to play a major role in the isolation of LBVs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)591-603
Number of pages13
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume472
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

isolation
stars
modeling
merger
luminosity
dissolution
suggestion
dissolving
life (durability)

Keywords

  • Binaries: general
  • Stars: evolution
  • Stars: massive
  • Stars: variables: general

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Modelling luminous-blue-variable isolation. / Aghakhanloo, Mojgan; Murphy, Jeremiah W.; Smith, Nathan; Hložek, Renée.

In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 472, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 591-603.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aghakhanloo, Mojgan ; Murphy, Jeremiah W. ; Smith, Nathan ; Hložek, Renée. / Modelling luminous-blue-variable isolation. In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2017 ; Vol. 472, No. 1. pp. 591-603.
@article{8b8fe5c7dec7404a9cabfa07e3a03bdb,
title = "Modelling luminous-blue-variable isolation",
abstract = "Observations show that luminous blue variables (LBVs) are far more dispersed than massive O-type stars, and Smith & Tombleson suggested that these large separations are inconsistent with a single-star evolution model of LBVs. Instead, they suggested that the large distances are most consistent with binary evolution scenarios. To test these suggestions, we modelled young stellar clusters and their passive dissolution, and we find that, indeed, the standard single-star evolution model is mostly inconsistent with the observed LBV environments. If LBVs are single stars, then the lifetimes inferred from their luminosity and mass are far too short to be consistent with their extreme isolation. This implies that there is either an inconsistency in the luminosity-to-mass mapping or the mass-to-age mapping. In this paper, we explore binary solutions that modify the mass-to-age mapping and are consistent with the isolation of LBVs. For the binary scenarios, our crude models suggest that LBVs are rejuvenated stars. They are either the result of mergers or they are mass gainers and received a kick when the primary star exploded. In the merger scenario, if the primary is about 19 M⊙, then the binary has enough time to wander far afield, merge and form a rejuvenated star. In the mass-gainer and kick scenario, we find that LBV isolation is consistent with a wide range of kick velocities, anywhere from 0 to ~105 km s-1. In either scenario, binarity seems to play a major role in the isolation of LBVs.",
keywords = "Binaries: general, Stars: evolution, Stars: massive, Stars: variables: general",
author = "Mojgan Aghakhanloo and Murphy, {Jeremiah W.} and Nathan Smith and Ren{\'e}e Hložek",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/MNRAS/STX2050",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "472",
pages = "591--603",
journal = "Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society",
issn = "0035-8711",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modelling luminous-blue-variable isolation

AU - Aghakhanloo, Mojgan

AU - Murphy, Jeremiah W.

AU - Smith, Nathan

AU - Hložek, Renée

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Observations show that luminous blue variables (LBVs) are far more dispersed than massive O-type stars, and Smith & Tombleson suggested that these large separations are inconsistent with a single-star evolution model of LBVs. Instead, they suggested that the large distances are most consistent with binary evolution scenarios. To test these suggestions, we modelled young stellar clusters and their passive dissolution, and we find that, indeed, the standard single-star evolution model is mostly inconsistent with the observed LBV environments. If LBVs are single stars, then the lifetimes inferred from their luminosity and mass are far too short to be consistent with their extreme isolation. This implies that there is either an inconsistency in the luminosity-to-mass mapping or the mass-to-age mapping. In this paper, we explore binary solutions that modify the mass-to-age mapping and are consistent with the isolation of LBVs. For the binary scenarios, our crude models suggest that LBVs are rejuvenated stars. They are either the result of mergers or they are mass gainers and received a kick when the primary star exploded. In the merger scenario, if the primary is about 19 M⊙, then the binary has enough time to wander far afield, merge and form a rejuvenated star. In the mass-gainer and kick scenario, we find that LBV isolation is consistent with a wide range of kick velocities, anywhere from 0 to ~105 km s-1. In either scenario, binarity seems to play a major role in the isolation of LBVs.

AB - Observations show that luminous blue variables (LBVs) are far more dispersed than massive O-type stars, and Smith & Tombleson suggested that these large separations are inconsistent with a single-star evolution model of LBVs. Instead, they suggested that the large distances are most consistent with binary evolution scenarios. To test these suggestions, we modelled young stellar clusters and their passive dissolution, and we find that, indeed, the standard single-star evolution model is mostly inconsistent with the observed LBV environments. If LBVs are single stars, then the lifetimes inferred from their luminosity and mass are far too short to be consistent with their extreme isolation. This implies that there is either an inconsistency in the luminosity-to-mass mapping or the mass-to-age mapping. In this paper, we explore binary solutions that modify the mass-to-age mapping and are consistent with the isolation of LBVs. For the binary scenarios, our crude models suggest that LBVs are rejuvenated stars. They are either the result of mergers or they are mass gainers and received a kick when the primary star exploded. In the merger scenario, if the primary is about 19 M⊙, then the binary has enough time to wander far afield, merge and form a rejuvenated star. In the mass-gainer and kick scenario, we find that LBV isolation is consistent with a wide range of kick velocities, anywhere from 0 to ~105 km s-1. In either scenario, binarity seems to play a major role in the isolation of LBVs.

KW - Binaries: general

KW - Stars: evolution

KW - Stars: massive

KW - Stars: variables: general

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049232512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049232512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/MNRAS/STX2050

DO - 10.1093/MNRAS/STX2050

M3 - Article

VL - 472

SP - 591

EP - 603

JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

SN - 0035-8711

IS - 1

ER -