Monitoring severity of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome: New and progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, scoring systems

Katri V Typpo, Jacques R. Lacroix

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To describe the diagnostic criteria of new and progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and scoring systems that might be used to assess and monitor the severity and progression of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in children presented as part of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development MODS Workshop (March 26-27, 2015). Data Sources: Literature review, research data, and expert opinion. Study Selection: Not applicable. Data Extraction: Moderated by an experienced expert from the field, issues relevant to the monitoring of the severity of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome including new and progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and scoring systems were presented, discussed, and debated with a focus on identifying knowledge gaps and research priorities. Data Synthesis: Summary of presentations and discussion supported and supplemented by relevant literature. Conclusions: Many sets of diagnostic criteria of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome are presently available. All are useful, but their diagnostic and predictive value can be improved. Several types of diagnostic criteria are candidates to describe the severity and to monitor the progression of cases of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, which include existing scores of organ dysfunction: Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction, version 2, daily Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction, version 2, organ failure-free days, etc. If a new set of diagnostic criteria of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome is created, its value must be validated. Furthermore, the epidemiology of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome based on these new diagnostic criteria must be compared with the epidemiology found with the preexisting sets of diagnostic criteria. The reliability as well as the added values of additional or new candidate markers of organ dysfunction and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome severity must be studied and compared.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S17-S23
JournalPediatric Critical Care Medicine
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Multiple Organ Failure
Epidemiology
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.)
Organ Dysfunction Scores
Pediatrics
Information Storage and Retrieval
Expert Testimony
Research
Education

Keywords

  • Diagnosis
  • Monitoring
  • Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
  • Multiple organ failure
  • Pediatric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Monitoring severity of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome : New and progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, scoring systems. / Typpo, Katri V; Lacroix, Jacques R.

In: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2017, p. S17-S23.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{9c1266404b3b498e85e85d1e97a1db5d,
title = "Monitoring severity of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome: New and progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, scoring systems",
abstract = "Objective: To describe the diagnostic criteria of new and progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and scoring systems that might be used to assess and monitor the severity and progression of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in children presented as part of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development MODS Workshop (March 26-27, 2015). Data Sources: Literature review, research data, and expert opinion. Study Selection: Not applicable. Data Extraction: Moderated by an experienced expert from the field, issues relevant to the monitoring of the severity of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome including new and progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and scoring systems were presented, discussed, and debated with a focus on identifying knowledge gaps and research priorities. Data Synthesis: Summary of presentations and discussion supported and supplemented by relevant literature. Conclusions: Many sets of diagnostic criteria of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome are presently available. All are useful, but their diagnostic and predictive value can be improved. Several types of diagnostic criteria are candidates to describe the severity and to monitor the progression of cases of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, which include existing scores of organ dysfunction: Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction, version 2, daily Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction, version 2, organ failure-free days, etc. If a new set of diagnostic criteria of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome is created, its value must be validated. Furthermore, the epidemiology of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome based on these new diagnostic criteria must be compared with the epidemiology found with the preexisting sets of diagnostic criteria. The reliability as well as the added values of additional or new candidate markers of organ dysfunction and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome severity must be studied and compared.",
keywords = "Diagnosis, Monitoring, Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, Multiple organ failure, Pediatric",
author = "Typpo, {Katri V} and Lacroix, {Jacques R.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1097/PCC.0000000000001049",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "S17--S23",
journal = "Pediatric Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1529-7535",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monitoring severity of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

T2 - New and progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, scoring systems

AU - Typpo, Katri V

AU - Lacroix, Jacques R.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Objective: To describe the diagnostic criteria of new and progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and scoring systems that might be used to assess and monitor the severity and progression of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in children presented as part of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development MODS Workshop (March 26-27, 2015). Data Sources: Literature review, research data, and expert opinion. Study Selection: Not applicable. Data Extraction: Moderated by an experienced expert from the field, issues relevant to the monitoring of the severity of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome including new and progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and scoring systems were presented, discussed, and debated with a focus on identifying knowledge gaps and research priorities. Data Synthesis: Summary of presentations and discussion supported and supplemented by relevant literature. Conclusions: Many sets of diagnostic criteria of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome are presently available. All are useful, but their diagnostic and predictive value can be improved. Several types of diagnostic criteria are candidates to describe the severity and to monitor the progression of cases of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, which include existing scores of organ dysfunction: Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction, version 2, daily Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction, version 2, organ failure-free days, etc. If a new set of diagnostic criteria of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome is created, its value must be validated. Furthermore, the epidemiology of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome based on these new diagnostic criteria must be compared with the epidemiology found with the preexisting sets of diagnostic criteria. The reliability as well as the added values of additional or new candidate markers of organ dysfunction and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome severity must be studied and compared.

AB - Objective: To describe the diagnostic criteria of new and progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and scoring systems that might be used to assess and monitor the severity and progression of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in children presented as part of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development MODS Workshop (March 26-27, 2015). Data Sources: Literature review, research data, and expert opinion. Study Selection: Not applicable. Data Extraction: Moderated by an experienced expert from the field, issues relevant to the monitoring of the severity of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome including new and progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and scoring systems were presented, discussed, and debated with a focus on identifying knowledge gaps and research priorities. Data Synthesis: Summary of presentations and discussion supported and supplemented by relevant literature. Conclusions: Many sets of diagnostic criteria of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome are presently available. All are useful, but their diagnostic and predictive value can be improved. Several types of diagnostic criteria are candidates to describe the severity and to monitor the progression of cases of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, which include existing scores of organ dysfunction: Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction, version 2, daily Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction, version 2, organ failure-free days, etc. If a new set of diagnostic criteria of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome is created, its value must be validated. Furthermore, the epidemiology of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome based on these new diagnostic criteria must be compared with the epidemiology found with the preexisting sets of diagnostic criteria. The reliability as well as the added values of additional or new candidate markers of organ dysfunction and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome severity must be studied and compared.

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Monitoring

KW - Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

KW - Multiple organ failure

KW - Pediatric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016479251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016479251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001049

DO - 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001049

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28248830

AN - SCOPUS:85016479251

VL - 18

SP - S17-S23

JO - Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

JF - Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1529-7535

IS - 3

ER -