Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity

Helen K. Li, Larry D. Hubbard, Ronald P. Danis, Adol Esquivel, Jose F. Florez-Arango, Elizabeth A. Krupinski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose. To assess agreement between monoscopic and stereoscopic photography for research classification of the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods. Monoscopic digital (MD) images were compared with stereo digital (SD) and film (SF) photographs from a 152-eye cohort with full-spectrum Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels for agreement on severity level, DR presence with ascending severity threshold, presence of DR index lesions, and repeatability of grading. Results. There was substantial agreement classifying ETDRS DR severity levels between MD and SF (k = 0.65, kw [linear weighted] = 0.87), MD and SD (k = 0.66, kw = 0.87), and SD and SF (k = 0.62, kw = 0.86) images. Marginal homogeneity analyses found no significant difference between MD and SF images (P = 0.53, Bhapkar test). The k agreement between MD and SF ranged from 0.80 to 0.94 for the presence or absence of eight ascending DR severity thresholds. Repeatability between the readers of the MD images was equal to or better than that of the readers of SD or SF images. Severity threshold grading repeatability between readers was similar with the MD and SF images. The k agreement between MD and SF for identifying diabetic retinopathy lesions ranged from moderate to almost perfect. The k comparisons showed that performance of grading new vessels on the disc in MD images was slightly lower than that with the SF images.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3184-3192
Number of pages9
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume51
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this