Abstract
Writing in 1991, and discussing the political climate of the United States, Thomas Nagel made the following observations: There is renewed hostility to homosexuals, and to pornography. Such feelings also play a part in the opposition to the right to abortion, which is closely connected with the opposition to sexual freedom, particularly the sexual freedom of women. While I do not sympathize with the ideals behind this moral environmentalism, it must be recognized that given their values the conservatives do have a genuine interest here, since extensive individual liberty in sexual matters, creates an emotional and cultural climate in which their preferred forms of sexual life are more difficult to maintain and to inculcate in their children. My purpose is not to defend the conservative ideals that Nagel did not sympathize with. This is not an essay on sexual morality. But I do wish to defend the general practice of moral environmentalism that Nagel’s remarks invite us to consider; or to put it more accurately, I wish to defend one understanding of that practice from what I take to be the most important objection raised against it. This objection appeals to the value of personal autonomy.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Paternalism: Theory and Practice |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Pages | 93-114 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781139179003, 9781107025462 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2010 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Arts and Humanities(all)
Cite this
Moral environmentalism. / Wall, Steven P.
Paternalism: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, 2010. p. 93-114.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - Moral environmentalism
AU - Wall, Steven P
PY - 2010/1/1
Y1 - 2010/1/1
N2 - Writing in 1991, and discussing the political climate of the United States, Thomas Nagel made the following observations: There is renewed hostility to homosexuals, and to pornography. Such feelings also play a part in the opposition to the right to abortion, which is closely connected with the opposition to sexual freedom, particularly the sexual freedom of women. While I do not sympathize with the ideals behind this moral environmentalism, it must be recognized that given their values the conservatives do have a genuine interest here, since extensive individual liberty in sexual matters, creates an emotional and cultural climate in which their preferred forms of sexual life are more difficult to maintain and to inculcate in their children. My purpose is not to defend the conservative ideals that Nagel did not sympathize with. This is not an essay on sexual morality. But I do wish to defend the general practice of moral environmentalism that Nagel’s remarks invite us to consider; or to put it more accurately, I wish to defend one understanding of that practice from what I take to be the most important objection raised against it. This objection appeals to the value of personal autonomy.
AB - Writing in 1991, and discussing the political climate of the United States, Thomas Nagel made the following observations: There is renewed hostility to homosexuals, and to pornography. Such feelings also play a part in the opposition to the right to abortion, which is closely connected with the opposition to sexual freedom, particularly the sexual freedom of women. While I do not sympathize with the ideals behind this moral environmentalism, it must be recognized that given their values the conservatives do have a genuine interest here, since extensive individual liberty in sexual matters, creates an emotional and cultural climate in which their preferred forms of sexual life are more difficult to maintain and to inculcate in their children. My purpose is not to defend the conservative ideals that Nagel did not sympathize with. This is not an essay on sexual morality. But I do wish to defend the general practice of moral environmentalism that Nagel’s remarks invite us to consider; or to put it more accurately, I wish to defend one understanding of that practice from what I take to be the most important objection raised against it. This objection appeals to the value of personal autonomy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928052733&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928052733&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781139179003.006
DO - 10.1017/CBO9781139179003.006
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:84928052733
SN - 9781139179003
SN - 9781107025462
SP - 93
EP - 114
BT - Paternalism: Theory and Practice
PB - Cambridge University Press
ER -