Moral Responsibility, Manipulation Arguments, and History: Assessing the Resilience of Nonhistorical Compatibilism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Manipulation arguments for incompatibilism all build upon some example or other in which an agent is covertly manipulated into acquiring a psychic structure on the basis of which she performs an action. The featured agent, it is alleged, is manipulated into satisfying conditions compatibilists would take to be sufficient for acting freely. Such an example used in the context of an argument for incompatibilism is meant to elicit the intuition that, due to the pervasiveness of the manipulation, the agent does not act freely and is not morally responsible for what she does. It is then claimed that any agent's coming to be in the same psychic state through a deterministic process is no different in any relevant respect from the pertinent manner of manipulation. Hence, it is concluded that compatibilists' proposed sufficient conditions for free will and moral responsibility are inadequate, and that free will and moral responsibility are incompatible with determinism. One way for compatibilists to resist certain manipulation arguments is by appealing to historical requirements that, they contend, relevant manipulated agents lack. While a growing number of compatibilists advance an historical thesis, in this paper, I redouble my efforts to show, in defense of nonhistorical compatibilists like Harry Frankfurt, that there is still life left in a nonhistorical view. The historical compatibilists, I contend, have fallen shy of discrediting their nonhistorical compatibilist rivals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-174
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Ethics
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

Keywords

  • Alfred Mele
  • Derivative freedom
  • Direct freedom
  • Harry Frankfurt
  • Historical compatibilism
  • Incompatibilism
  • Manipulation argument
  • Nonhistorical compatibilism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Moral Responsibility, Manipulation Arguments, and History: Assessing the Resilience of Nonhistorical Compatibilism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this